Moving More Quickly on Moderation

You are asking someone zeichen has practically made into her dedicated protector what he thinks. You may as well ask Smithereens who is even more brainwashed into hating zarroette what he thinks.

and it's 99℅ likely that she has never committed a felony crime in her life, much less murder.

1. Asperger's Syndrome.
   
2. ADD.
   
3. Undiagnosed narcissism. 
   

I don't see anything wrong with the content or speed of his five replies.

I have however witnessed him say he would rejoice at your suicide and would find you disgusting if you submitted to him sexually.

If so, what's an alternate peacekeeping suggestion for the interim? There's no telling when active moderation will be implemented. The block function only works with PM's. 

Without commenting on Zeichen, I will attest that RM does become unusually and inappropriately fixated on certain people. Back on DDO, he became fixated on me because I get him lynched in a Mafia game and he hounded me for months, apparently unable to separate reality from fiction. Here, I had to ask him to stop @ing me because my mailbox was filling up with his mentions of me for stuff that had nothing to do with me.

When I did, he decided to pester me in PMs, prompting me to jump on the "we need a block" bandwagon.

Now, while I agree that engagement can exacerbate the issue, let me assure you that, since joining here, I haven't engaged him. Save from: 1) asking him to stop @ing me; and 2) asking him to stop PMing me, I have not engaged him at all, yet I still end up being the recipient of this spamming and weird behavior.

I can easily imagine Mike being exasperated with all this inflammatory talk of what members have done or said off site. We can't seem to stop dragging DDO history into this. I know I find it hard to resist bringing it up sometimes. But it's just not his concern. I think how we're judged here should be earned by our conduct here only, and that goes for Zeichen and RM. Knowing how a member has behaved on other sites is certainly useful for one's own reference when dealing with that member, but it should be neither relevant or actionable to the administration. In my opinion, of course.

As for RM's behavior here, he @'d me a few times in the debate voting thread as well, but quickly desisted. I admit I have very mixed feelings about publicizing these PM's. But I see that you did have to tell him three times. Did he permanently stop afterward? 

At present, the block function only works with PM's. However, I have spoken with Mikhail today and he plans to extend this function to the forum and debates section(s). This should mean that if you block someone, they cannot respond to any posts that you make.

You think you have the disgusting right to seduce me or flirt with me because you're female. I'm not SameStevens or Smithereens, I aint got no room for mercy for a female enemy of mine whether they are female or not

RM chose to respond to me five times -- in quick succession. Now, any logical or non-biased person would recognize that this is excessive, and that his behavior was intended to provoke

it is very easy to discern when someone is becoming excitable, because they usually say more than they should, or they make multiple posts within a short period of time.

So easy to discern, and yet you would have us hold it is indiscernible to you and there is just noooo way you fully realize poking Rational will illicit that reaction. No, you do fully understand thats exactly the reaction that will be gotten. 

I find that you are pulling out the victim card in this to be a rather trite usage, especially since you full out acknowledged its easy to discern when somebody is over-emotional and will react in such a manner. Again, you would have us hold its obvious to discern, but in the same breadth hold that your actions have zero recognition of this and are done without any knowledge it will. 

RM isnt innocent in this, neither are you, and frankly, pulling out the victim card. As you have said he has admitted to having 3 kinds of mental disorders. Yet, again, you choose to poke. Are you the kinda person that tries to grab ice cream out of an autists hands and cry wrongdoing when you get bit? 🤔

You think you have the disgusting right to seduce me or flirt with me because you're female. I'm not SameStevens or Smithereens, I aint got no room for mercy for a female enemy of mine whether they are female or not.

This is quite some projection you have going here, as illustrated by:

So easy to discern, and yet you would have us hold it is indiscernible to you and there is just noooo way you fully realize poking Rational will illicit that reaction. No, you do fully understand thats exactly the reaction that will be gotten. 

I find that you are pulling out the victim card in this to be a rather trite usage, especially since you full out acknowledged its easy to discern when somebody is over-emotional and will react in such a manner. Again, you would have us hold its obvious to discern, but in the same breadth hold that your actions have zero recognition of this and are done without any knowledge it will. 

RM isnt innocent in this, neither are you, and frankly, pulling out the victim card. As you have said he has admitted to having 3 kinds of mental disorders. Yet, again, you choose to poke. Are you the kinda person that tries to grab ice cream out of an autists hands and cry wrongdoing when you get bit?

• I have not claimed to be a victim. 
  
• RM did say that he wanted me to kill myself, and also threatened to slit my throat.