Proving all (other) religions wrong.

To tell me that I am nothing more or less than the rest of the universe simply tells me that I am meaningless.

Reconciliation with GOD is a very good analogy for being nothing more or less than the rest of the universe.

You give your life meaning because that it what you are programmed to do, and if that includes believing in a specific GOD, then that is absolutely fine.

My life has meaning without the need for belief in a specific GOD.

Nonetheless, should there be a specific GOD, I expect that they would be wise and noble enough to understand.

The good news of the Gospel is not about heaven or hell.  That misses the point. It is about reconciliation with God.  I would see no point in heaven unless there was reconciliation with God. 

I do in fact. You did not exist for billions of years before your birth and were quite unbothered by it so I wager when you don't exist for billions of years after your death you will find it equally untroubling. Also have you heard the good news? No god(s) are waiting to throw you into eternal torment after you die for real or imagined transgressions you can neither avoid nor understand. In fact I find the whole idea of heaven and hell to be very disquieting and I don't think Christians have much to offer that counts as comfort when examined logically whether they are correct or not. 

I take the view that absolute [MORAL] right and wrong exists as a matter of logic.   

Hence, if a religion or worldview declares  ipso facto that no such things exist then logically I am able to deduce that as a matter of reason, they are not the correct religion.

This rules out most of the religions and worldviews in the world.

Not all obviously, but it certainly clears the deck somewhat. 

This leaves only religions and worldviews which declare absolute right and wrong and also exclusivity.

You have yet to refute this logically. 

Christians have no capacity to offer comfort in death. 

They have nothing to offer in hope.

They might think that they have the truth - which I would refute.

Yet even if they were correct-  they reduce life to nothingness with no meaning - and no purpose (worship an egotistical god). 

In Christianity, my "life" only has "meaning" because I'm a servant of an "all powerful" god who doesn't need me for anything except to flatter it constantly.

IT is a cruel worldview.

And i am not trying to be mean - but when you take away hope from people (by calling them servants of a god) - you need to replace it with something of at least equal worth.

Otherwise - it is a spirit of meanness.

I take the view that absolute [MORAL] right and wrong exists as a matter of logic.   

REAL-TRUE-FACTS must be empirically demonstrable and or logically necessary.

EVERYTHING ELSE IS INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM OPINION (GNOSIS/QUALIA).

Hence, if a religion or worldview declares  ipso facto that no such things exist then logically I am able to deduce that as a matter of reason, they are not the correct religion.

NEARLY ALL RELIGIONS DECLARE ABSOLUTE MORAL RIGHTS AND WRONGS.

ISLAM for example.  HINDUISM for example.  Let's try to eliminate these two with your "logical" methodology.

This rules out most of the religions and worldviews in the world.

Please name ONE.

Not all obviously, but it certainly clears the deck somewhat. 

Please name ONE.

This leaves only religions and worldviews which declare absolute right and wrong and also exclusivity.

WHICH IS ALMOST ALL OF THEM.

You have yet to refute this logically. 

You have yet to demonstrate this logically.

It is a religion based on the notion of polytheism - many gods - many rights and wrongs

the point of their religion is to get back to Nirvana, into the nothingness of life - It resists absolute truth.  

The statement of logic is - "There are no absolutes". Or "there is one absolute".  Both are statements of a certain logic - but both are self-contradictory. Both prove logically that absolutes must exist.  It does not tell us which absolutes exist or even how we can find them. And to be honest it does not really matter that they don't. What matters is that it implies logically that absolute truth and principles and laws exist. 

Islam on the other hand, (...) believes in reincarnation 

The statement of logic is - "There are no absolutes". Or "there is one absolute".  Both are statements of a certain logic - but both are self-contradictory.

Both prove logically that absolutes must exist. 

It does not tell us which absolutes exist or even how we can find them.

And to be honest it does not really matter that they don't. What matters is that it implies logically that absolute truth and principles and laws exist. 

If you understand that religions are just interpreting the nature what they observe, and there is no culture or religion that the Creator favors over another and rejects everything else

One can examine this body of knowledge

Any religion which holds to the view of ONE GOD or ONE primary Law or Principle.

New Age philosophy,

wicca,

Hinduism,

Buddhism,

All the liberal forms of Christianity, such as Unitarianism.

Cults of Christianity like the Mormons.

Atheism.

Most forms of animalism, the Asian forms of religion based on worship of ancestors, etc etc. 

...the point of their religion is to get back to Nirvana, into the nothingness of life - It resists absolute truth. 

...the point of their religion is to get back to Nirvana, into the nothingness of life - It resists absolute truth. 

NIRVANA = ONENESS WITH THE ESSENCE OF THE COSMOS

Christians say they believe in UNIFICATION WITH GOD after death.

IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY HAVE EXACTLY THE SAME GOAL.

Any religion which holds to the view of ONE GOD or ONE primary Law or Principle.

You must be a fan of Ahura Mazda. [LINK]

Islam on the other hand, (...) believes in reincarnation 

Citation needed. I do not think you are correct.

the point of their religion is to get back to Nirvana, into the nothingness of life - It resists absolute truth.  

According to many proponents of the concept of nirvana 

Nirvana = truth

Just as  according many proponents of the Yahweh 

Yahweh's word = truth

Then you have missed my point. If I am right you get to decide exactly what your life means. Neither atheism nor skepticism necessitates nihilism. 

That is not true though is it? You cannot decide to be an animal. You cannot decide to be the opposite sex.  You cannot decide to be taller or shorter. you cannot decide to be smarter or not. You cannot decide which country you were born into or when you will die. 

You can only subjectively for the moment you live decide whether or not you want to make it meaningful or not. And this does not make it meaningful - not really. After all, in 100 years no one is going to know who you are and what you have done - unless you are a super important person.  And no one will care either.  Unless there is meaning to history - there is no point in attempting to improve it - or try and not repeat mistakes.  What would be the point of saving the planet for future generations? Some altruistic meaning for you is not going to hit it with others. And why should people not just do whatever they want - not regarding laws if they can get away with it? 

If there is no God and we are all but specks in a moment - then I have nothing to live for but myself.  My children - I might love - but to be honest - if I have no purpose other than what I decide myself - then morality is a nonsense.  This would mean being a narcissist, a pycho-path, a pedophile is ok so far as I don't get caught and end up in prison. 

There would be no need to help others or to restrain myself.  And no one could say otherwise - if I decide for myself what my purpose is.  The restraints of society would have no holds over me.  I would obey the laws so far as they help me - but I would break them if I could get away with it. I would not need a conscious. Whatever for? If I die and everyone hates me - so what? If I live a life in the way that I want and find enjoyment and pleasure in - then this would be my path. 

To say that my belief in God restrains me - is true.  Yet it also provides purpose and meaning and a pleasure to live, plus hope in an otherwise ordinary world.  And yet, if I were today to throw of the yoke of oppression of religion and belief - I would find no desire to do what others want me to do. I would be for want of a better word - my own god. I would make my own rules and live anyway I please- without any regard for anyone else.  This would be consistent with that position.  After all I would have a few short years - and then I would be gone - blotted out forever - having a name after you are dead is meaningless. Having children is meaningless. Who will care? If I get canceled by this generation or all future generations - who cares?  What about children and their futures? What about them? Do I want them to have a good life? I do now because  of my beliefs -and the fact that I have hope to see them again in the future. But if there is no god - then honestly, they become a burden to stop me from pursuing my own happiness.  

Psycho-path - narcisist - nut job - selfish, greedy, mental - pervert - extremist - yes- and all of the above.  

You see you might think that neither atheism or skepticism necessitates nihilism. But it certainly does not prevent it - and it certainly encourages the thinking - of "there is no wrong - there is no right - and so far as I don't get caught - who cares? It does not provide a basis for looking after a world.  OR for the future. When it says it does - it has to borrow from other worldviews because atheism is DEVOID of beliefs. Isn't? You keep saying "Atheism is a non-system of non-beliefs".  But what you never go on to address is the implications of it.  But if you have no- beliefs - you have nothing.  An eclectic mix of every other worldviews' beliefs and doctrines is a fraudulent way of living life.   

I was referring to the knowledge I have picked up over the years. It is something  I heard along the paths. It surprised me at the time.  Since they talk about heaven and Hell. Yet, there are variants which do believe it. The citation I will get to in due course. A quick look on the internet says Muslims don't believe in reincarnation and yet some sites say they do. https://www.god-muslims.com/islam-and-reincarnation/