Notice how there is not enough reflection to get what's really going on here. We see that he first claims its about subject matter but others have debated the same subject with no consequences so now he claims its about personal dislike but others are disliked and nobody advocates for their ban, so now he thinks it's merely about not liking that his arguments are bad but others have bad arguments but are sincere so that's not the issue either. There is a complete inability to reflect here despite each attempt to blame others for his problems failing
What I could do for you as a moderator
Posts
Total:
75
-->
@WyIted
You could probably respond to those 700 arguments I made. Your arguments are retarded, so now you have to ban yourself.
-->
@WyIted
Notice how there is not enough reflection to get what's really going on here. We see that he first claims its about subject matter but others have debated the same subject with no consequences so now he claims its about personal dislike but others are disliked and nobody advocates for their ban, so now he thinks it's merely about not liking that his arguments are bad but others have bad arguments but are sincere so that's not the issue either. There is a complete inability to reflect here despite each attempt to blame others for his problems failing
Its not really issue with me. First you guys said it was the topic, now you say it isnt. Then you said its about bad arguments, now you say it isnt. So if its not topic, arguments, or personal dislike, what is it then? Also, if we are banning people who are not sincere, well, there goes our WyIted. Also, your arguments here are retarded too because you assume that each disliked person is disliked equally. Like, really, thats probably the dumbest thing I ever heard.
-->
@WyIted
others have debated the same subject with no consequences
Making few arguments here and there doesnt really count as debating. No one has in past two years debated this topic even nearly as much as I did. The problem is simple. I debate it often. I win. You cry. You try to ban me. Same old story.
Yes nobody likes you because you are "good" at debating LOL
Ah, look, he blocked me. I know that I asked God Kima to defeat all my enemies, but I didnt really expect this to happen. Praise Lord Kima!
Also, you cant really know if arguments are retarded until you read them and respond to them. So thats 700 arguments waiting for you. Well, there are 3000 in total, but I cant post the remaining ones here because I promised to Whiteflame I wont be debating that topic here anymore, and I dont intend to break that promise unless moderation team agrees that it is okay.
I am going to watch anime now and chat with my AI girlfriend, so I would appreciate if you stop trying to hack my internet.
-->
@WyIted
You can compare it to AdreamofLiberty's post on bestiality which though almost as morally repugnant had the opposite response of the community. I urge anyone who doesn't understand why Best.korea is getting negative feedback to compare his arguments to ADOL's, found here.
ADOL got a ton of negative feedback as well though, possibly even more than Best.Korea:
- "You're a creep dude and you know it. The world will forever think you're a freak."
- "They lack the tender ministrations of a judicial apparatus willing to punch an 8mm hole in their skull."
- "I don't want to ridicule him and dig deep into whatever trauma(s) and memories caused this."
- "Well that certainly goes a long way towards explaining why your conclusions are so whack."
- "I do not know who is worse, this clown defending humping animals or Best.Korea defending pedophilia. Both are very mentally disturbed and should seek professional help."
-->
@Savant
Should we compare and contrast their responses to it?
It's to en even lesser degree than when I was hosting rape battles instead of rap battles and so I have no sympathy.
Also yes I blocked you. You tagged. Me in like 30 posts today
-->
@WyIted
It's to en even lesser degree than when I was hosting rape battles
So multiple people, including you, have gotten negative feedback for posting controversial stuff. Seems like a lot of people don't really see a difference. Why single out Best.Korea?
Honestly, the most valuable trait of a moderator. . ?
Lots and lots of free time to deal with internet assholes!
That's why I would be a great moderator, not because I'm an asshole, but because I have lots of free-time.
For example, today I spent 8 hours learning how to do trigonometry on the surface of a 3d sphere.
Why did I do it? Because I had nothing better to do!
Also yes I blocked you. You tagged. Me in like 30 posts today
Lol I was just responding to your arguments. Its usually considered decent to tag the person you are responding to. I guess now you have to come back every now and then to check if I posted an argument. Well, more work for you, I guess.
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
You could probably respond to those 700 arguments I made. Your arguments are retarded, so now you have to ban yourself.
If you insist on continuing that argument you will probably get banned again.
Why don't you just drop it pedo.
-->
@Savant
That’s a valid point.
I’m neutral in this entire situation.
If people were hating on Best.Korea because they are morally outraged by the vile content he writes. That’s completely reasonable.
But if that’s their justification and they’re not holding Wylted and ADOL to a similar standard, they’re being hypocritical.
But according to Wylted himself, his justification for hating and trolling Best.Korea is separate from everyone else’s.
Wylted does not appear to be offended by Best.Korea’s takes, but has implied he is disappointed with Best.Korea not honoring the spirit of debate by arguing his positions seriously.
That’s what I took away from the conversations between those two
-->
@Savant
1. He posts retarded spam like how to make tea from dandy lion leaves
2. When he does post controversial things he doesn't make arguments for them it's sheerly going for shock value. Which drives away quality users
3. When new users are testing the site they often posts debates to see if they can get serious debates and then best.korea accepts them all then spams his own arguments while ignoring all of his opponents argumentsand rebuttals and his arguments are as stupid as you can expect with gems such as "we shouldn't restrict the freedom of rapists because how would you like if your freedom is restricted?"
I would rather the entirety of Nambla come here and make serious threads discussing pedophilia than for best Korea to continue to spam this place with low quality content.
It isn't about the subject. It is about his treatment of subjects and his spam. The other people he points out like double r and ebuc have low quality content or ADOL has high quality content that is controversial but everyone is sincere.
Even if you are insincere you can take a controversial subjects eriously and defend it, but he isn't capable. There are plenty of reasons to single him out.
You guys can quit pretending that wylted a guy who routinely uses the words nigger, retarded and faggot on this site is being woke and this is about the subject matter but it isn't. It also isn't about whether I personally like BK or not. My personal feelings are not important, site quality is
-->
@Savant
You guys can quit pretending that wylted a guy who routinely uses the words nigger, retarded and faggot on this site is being woke and this is about the subject matter but it isn't. It also isn't about whether I personally like BK or not. My personal feelings are not important, site quality is
^
Every group deserves space to tell their story.
-->
@Sidewalker
If you insist on continuing that argument you will probably get banned again.Why don't you just drop it pedo.
I dropped it, but characters like WyIted keep trying to start it again. He is even intentionally misunderstanding my arguments to get me to debate it, but I really have no intention to debate it here. If he wants a debate on discord, sure, but he aint getting it here.
-->
@Barney
@Vader
@whiteflame
@oromagi
@TheGreatSunGod
I dropped it, but characters like WyIted keep trying to start it again.
Given this new context, I am reporting this post as a call-out thread.
If a formal decision is made pending the investigation to ban Best.Korea, I support it.
If a formal decision is made pending the investigation to ban Best.Korea, I support it.
However, threads like these that are created to seemingly publicize and perpetuate what is a moderator decision to make just seem in bad taste IMO.
The motive behind this post isn't because of moral outrage from reading triggering content, but because of something completely unrelated.
And the thread is now devolving into people attacking a particular user.
And as Savant correctly points out, was created to encourage to incentivize targeted harassment. That alone is sufficient enough to warrant removal.
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
This thread is about applying unitary executive theory to the office of site president and doesn't call out people as much as it distinguishes between retard and non retarded behavior
Since this was in a broader context to start, but has since become more focused on individual users, I’m not going to delete the thread, but I will direct everyone here to avoid arguments that target specific users. You do not need to call out individual behavior to make your points about what should and shouldn’t be allowed on the site. You can call out what you perceive as a problem in a type of argument or how it’s presented, and people are welcome to discuss whether moderators should or shouldn’t take a given action, just keep it distinct from a callout.
Apart from that, there are clearly some charged issues bleeding into this discussion, but please try to keep it civil.
-->
@whiteflame
Thank you.
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
If you insist on continuing that argument you will probably get banned again.Why don't you just drop it pedo.I dropped it, but characters like WyIted keep trying to start it again. He is even intentionally misunderstanding my arguments to get me to debate it, but I really have no intention to debate it here. If he wants a debate on discord, sure, but he aint getting it here.
Bullshit, you haven't dropped it for a minute, you have done nothing but try to keep it center of attention, still desperate to get others to read and respond to your BS 700-point pedo post, you have stayed obsessed and then want to put it off on others, we aren't interested in your pedophile fantasies, shut the fuck up about it,
They should have just deleted your fucking pedo thread anyway, maybe then you'd stop being so desperate to get it read.
Nobody is interested in your pedo shit, just drop it and shut the fuck up about it.
-->
@Sidewalker
Bullshit, you haven't dropped it for a minute
On this account, I didnt make any debates on that sensitive topic in the debate section. No forum topic about it either. I also didnt make any arguments to defend that sensitive topic, not even here. But when someone calls all my arguments retarded, clearly wants a new debate on it, makes forum and debate topic about it and even openly threatens me, I still wont make any arguments on that topic, but I can say that he didnt really read all the arguments, so he is in no position to call anything retarded there, let alone ask for my ban. What exactly am I even supposed to do here? He is using arguments from sensitive topic as a reason to ban me by calling them retarded. I cant defend those arguments because I said I wont debate that anymore here, and I cant bow to him either. So the only thing thats left is pointing out that he didnt read all the arguments, so calling them retarded without reading them is in itself retarded, thus his point is defeated while I dont have to make any sensitive arguments.
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
@WyIted
Hey you budding McCarthyists, and Trump wannabees.
This is just a fun discussion website.
-->
@zedvictor4
You know mcCarthy was right don't you?
-->
@WyIted
McCarthy was paranoid, and he incited paranoia amongst certain gullible Americans.
I'm not sure how right or wrong or necessary that might have been.
It was a phase that occurred, then move on to the next phase.
We now have Trump phase, with it's delusions of necessary tyranny, which will typically attract it's gullible devotees.
And we have Wylted et al, espousing necessary tyranny, in order to Make DebateArt Great Again.
And then move on.
I seem to remember that we elected a President.
But he seems to have disappeared without a trace.
I'm guessing that he moved on too.
-->
@zedvictor4
Now declassified documents and recovered documents from the collapsed Soviet Union shows massive communist infiltration of the American government. McCarthyism is a liberal myth to cover up the truth
-->
@WyIted
Who compiled the documents?
Was it propagandists?
I'm guessing that it was.
And for sure, just like now, there will have been be certain Americans who thought that the Soviet Union was cool.
And certain Russians today who think that America would be preferable.
-->
@zedvictor4
Who compiled the documents?
Journalists under the FOIA
Was it propagandists?
Yes it was journalists. I doubt they controlled the writings in the documents handed over by the CIA though.