Listen to me debate live.

There is content on religious topics and discussions on this YouTube channel you can listen to at your leisure.
Please go to please go to this web address https://youtube.com/@j.talkstothepeopleradio6008
Feel free to subscribe as more content similar will be released soon.

To listen live or join in live discussion, send a message or comment.

Thats a very cool channel. Subscribed.

When is your first debate?

I think you should debate @tigerlord on religion.

This is really a must watch!

I have to say, so much debating on debate art really made you into a great live debater!

"Freedom is needed to bring you to the goal."

- "Unless my goal is to have no freedom."

That is debatable.

"I think you should debate @tigerlord on religion."

I can certainly question the person to see where he or she is. 

Tagging you both here.

If only there was a site where people were allowed to debate things.

I already wanted  to do that

My channel, I can respond in video format.

We can debate that way, just  transcribe the video, prepare the  rebuttal and post like rounds on DADC

Mall I subbed u too

I can either debate or discuss a topic on debate art with you or correspond via YouTube video . One way or the other, not both in one instance.

What are some things related to religion that you argue for or against?

This should be interesting.

I did not mean that, I meant even for videos can get them in written form so that we can prepare our argument, if something think that it's hard for someone to do video debate. I did not mean to do both at same time. 

My stance is islam, what is yours? Then we can decide a resolution, on the other hand if you can suggest?

I did not mean that, I meant even for videos can get them in written form so that we can prepare our argument, if something think that it's hard for someone to do video debate. I did not mean to do both at same time

Got lost in translation. You cleared the mistake.

Now mention the topic we can make a video about it. 

What about problem of evil, which was prime cause to introduce trinity and crucifixion.

That will be a great topic for debate.

Old video for little intro, though make another.

Old video for little intro, though make another.

I have many stances. Do you believe the biblical scriptures have contradictions?

You want me to make a video about it?

And you will respond in video too?

Well, one topic I already introduced in previous posts, what you say about it?

He just posted a video full of Christian’s contradictions.

No one else interested in it?

Your best chance for a debate is Mall.

Due to the number of messages, I'm not sure what the exact topic is you're looking for. I don't believe the scripture teach the trinity as in three distinct persons.

The crucifixion, I don't know what is supposed to be the issue there. Now if you want to discuss biblical contradictions, state them here or make a video or if you already have a video, you can give the title of it or you can just setup a debate on this site.

Select one of the options, we can go from there .

What you say about it?

Good starting point. Did God die for humanity? Or is salvation fake?

I tagged the wrong person above. 

Logical problem of salvation, it seems fake and it's innovation in Christianity but not reality. Then thing is concept of salvation could not be true because jesus did not talk with anyone after he was supposed curxifiction. Also flesh is not god even they say nature or god, still nature of god being human also defy the godship and how can nature or a god be human. That should not make him god in fact it clearly shows hybridism. Whether they say it's flesh or nature but we can see a physically entity not some hypothetical or metaphysical so that you can say it's just nature but it's a full fledge physical entity and how can you say it's just nature or god to show it's metaphysical and physical laws won't apply on him. So i would say flesh being not god or nature or god but human shows that god did not die and god did not die even jesus was being crucified but in actuality he was not by islamic prospective.