Posts

Hot
Total: 73
CatholicApologetics
CatholicApologetics's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 96
0
1
7
CatholicApologetics's avatar
CatholicApologetics
0
1
7
INTRODUCTION.

I would like to welcome everyone to the first "Sunday Class" session. What exactly is this? Simply put, it’s a modern Sunday School—an initiative I felt called to start after encouragement from a few DART members. Each Sunday, my aim is to address a significant topic within the Catholic Church or an ethical question relevant to today’s world. These may include challenges such as homosexuality or transgenderism. As Christians, we are called not to shy away from such matters but to engage them boldly and faithfully.

Let me preface this: I am not perfect. Like all of us, I am flawed and in need of God’s grace. This is a journey, and I ask for your patience as I learn alongside you. Think of this as a pilot episode or a beta test. I am bound to make mistakes, but my imperfections do not diminish the truth I hope to share. I encourage you to correct me charitably if I err and to pose genuine questions in the comments. However, understand I may not respond to argumentative comments. These posts are not meant to debate.

Lastly, I urge everyone to approach this with an open mind and heart. As C.S. Lewis said: "Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance." If these discussions help resolve obstacles to faith, they could lead you to the most significant decision of your life.

TOPIC.

Today's question is the following: "Why did God send Jesus to die for our sins which only continue to multiply when he could have removed sin once and for all?" This is a brilliant question asked by @Shila. Before addressing it, readers must understand the basic principles of Christianity. For those fairly versed in the faith, feel free to skip to the next section. However, for those who do not know much about Christianity, I encourage you to continue reading here.

God has given humans a "code of conduct" which we are called to follow, a set of rules. For example, He tells us not to murder or steal (Exodus 20:13-15). A sin is deviance from these laws and an offense against God. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) defines sin as the following: "Sin is an offense against reason, truth, and right conscience; it is failure in genuine love for God and neighbor caused by a perverse attachment to certain goods. It wounds the nature of man and injures human solidarity. It has been defined as "an utterance, a deed, or a desire contrary to the eternal law."" (CCC 1849). Sin is not just breaking a rule—it is a rupture in our relationship with God, who is the source of life itself. This separation from God naturally results in death, both physical and spiritual. As St. Paul says: "For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23).

As a general rule of thumb, everyone has sinned at one point or another. In Christian theology, Jesus Christ, who is God Himself, chose to take on the punishment  Himself to atone for the sins you and I have commited.

ANSWER.

Now that we understand the basic framework of Christianity, we can begin to tackle the question more intimately. To remind all readers, the question posed was "Why did God send Jesus to die for our sins which only continue to multiply when he could have removed sin once and for all?"

There is a fundamental misunderstanding in the question above. We must understand the nature of God. God is infinitely just: "The Rock, his work is perfect, and all his ways are just. A faithful God, without deceit, just and upright is he" (Deuteronomy 32:4; cf. Psalm 7:11).  Because God is infinitely just, it is against His nature to simply "remove sin" without just consequences. Furthermore, in order to "remove sin once and for all," God would need to remove what makes us different: our free will. It is our free will that enables us to choose to sin or choose to uphold God's commandments. God gave us free will as a result of love. God created us for love, and love cannot exist without freedom. To love God, we must be free to choose Him rather than being forced. God knew that free will would allow for the possibility of sin because humans could misuse their freedom by choosing against Him. This is what happened with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. However, the alternative—creating beings incapable of moral choice—would negate the possibility of love and virtue. God deemed it better to create beings with the capacity for both great good and great evil than to create beings without the capacity for choice. St. Augustine addressed this when he wrote: "For God judged it better to bring good out of evil than not to permit any evil to exist" (Enchiridion, Chapter 8).

To answer the second part of the question ("Why did God send Jesus to die for our sins?"), we need to understand a crucial concept. The question is framed very ambiguously. Specifically when it states "Why did God send Jesus." I find that this presupposes that Jesus is not God Himself. A better phrasing would be, "Why did God the Father send God the Son to die for our sins?" This delves within the dogma of the Holy Trinity, the teaching that there are three distinct Persons within the Godhead: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, who are all God but not each other. In order to preemtively address confusion, allow me to give an analogy to visualize this concept. The Trinity is like the sun: God the Father is like the sun itself, Jesus is like the light that illuminates the sun and creation, and the Holy Spirit is like the heat from the sun which warms and affects creation. However, this analogy could be interpreted to be heretical (Arianism), as it could be said that the light and heat are bi-products or creations from the sun. In the end, all analogies, metaphors, and illustrations break down. There is no 1:1 comparison with a triune God. All analogies fall short because the Trinity is a divine mystery.

Even if you do not understand the Trinity, the one thing to remember while answering this question is that Jesus is God. The reason He came down to die for our sins is quite simple: He did that out of His boundless love for us, desiring to restore the broken relationship between humanity and God, to free us from the bondage of sin and death, and to offer us the gift of eternal communion with Him, reflecting the infinite depth of God’s mercy and the value He places on each soul. 

SUMMARY.

In summary, the question "Why did God send Jesus to die for our sins which only continue to multiply when he could have removed sin once and for all?" is ultimately a question about love. God gave us free will out of love, knowing it would make sin possible but also make true love achievable. In His infinite mercy and justice, God did not abandon us to the consequences of sin but entered into our brokenness through Jesus Christ. The Cross is the ultimate expression of divine love—a love so profound that Jesus bore the penalty of sin to restore our relationship with Him. Though sin still exists, God offers us the grace to overcome it, inviting each of us into a loving, eternal communion with Him. He desperately wants this love to be reciprocated, and I invite all readers to reflect on God's infinite love. Even if you were the only person to have ever sinned, He would still sacrifice Himself in order to free you from the penalty of sin.

CLOSING REMARKS.

This marks this end of the first Sunday School. Thanks to all readers for bearing with me until the end. I would appreciate feedback in the comments to understand what I could imrpove on next week. If there are any questions regarding the explenations, feel free to address me in the comments.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,379
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@CatholicApologetics
As someone who wants to learn more about Christianity (even though that’s not my religion), I think this is a great idea.
CatholicApologetics
CatholicApologetics's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 96
0
1
7
CatholicApologetics's avatar
CatholicApologetics
0
1
7
-->
@ILikePie5
Thanks! Let me know if you have any questions.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
When a solution to a problem is proposed. If the problem goes away or is reduced then the solution is considered a success.
In the case of the question asked, “Why did God send Jesus to die for our sins which only continue to multiply when he could have removed sin once and for all?" 
The solution did not make the problem go away, the problem of sin continued to multiply. Therefore the solution was a failure. Jesus’s sacrifice was not necessary and was done in vain.

Take for example karma as a solution.
What is karma in short answer?
Karma is a word meaning the result of a person's actions as well as the actions themselves. It is a term about the cycle of cause and effect. According to the theory of Karma, what happens to a person, happens because they caused it with their actions.

Karma is self accountability.
The actions of an individual , the individual is held accountable. They have to atone for it in their current life and carry over the burden in their next life till justice is fulfilled.

This solution does not hold another person accountable for the actions of others. The debt is paid by the person who incurred it.

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 370
Posts: 11,239
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@CatholicApologetics
Its going to be very hard to keep this a "no debate" topic, but I guess we should honor the Sunday School and ask questions instead of making arguments.

I dont have any questions right now, but this was a great read.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Best.Korea
Its going to be very hard to keep this a "no debate" topic, but I guess we should honor the Sunday School and ask questions instead of making arguments.

I dont have any questions right now, but this was a great read
You should add going to Sunday School to your list of intelligent to do list.
CatholicApologetics
CatholicApologetics's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 96
0
1
7
CatholicApologetics's avatar
CatholicApologetics
0
1
7
I also created a new hashtag called Sunday School. At the very top of this post, you can click on it and see all the posts under the hashtag "Sunday School." Hopefully, this will make it accessible to see all past Sunday Schools.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@CatholicApologetics
I also created a new hashtag called Sunday School. At the very top of this post, you can click on it and see all the posts under the hashtag "Sunday School." Hopefully, this will make it accessible to see all past Sunday Schools.
Do you have a graduation list as well?
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@CatholicApologetics
I’ll preface with the fact that I am very much an atheist. That said, I’m a fan of learning what Christian’s think, so I’m gonna ask a question that bugs me as someone who cares for animals.

Do animals have free will? If not, what is free will defined as? If so, can they sin, and did Jesus die for them as well?

The reason I ask this is because I see a lot of Christian’s with a very human-centric mindset, and it’s odd to me that someone who supposedly cares so much for life has no problem with harming animals in any way. I’m wondering if they possibly see themselves as superior, and if free will is the determining factor here.
CatholicApologetics
CatholicApologetics's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 96
0
1
7
CatholicApologetics's avatar
CatholicApologetics
0
1
7
-->
@borz_kriffle
That's a very good question that I'd love to answer. However, I don't want to clutter the comments with questions that aren't related to the post's topic. If this is a pressing issue, feel free to send me a DM privately. If not, it is my top question for next week's post. 
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@CatholicApologetics
If you’re doing it next week, I can wait! It’s not vital to my life or anything, so feel free to take your time.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@borz_kriffle
If you’re doing it next week, I can wait! It’s not vital to my life or anything, so feel free to take your time.
Do you have an Animal Translator AI to translate the reply you get next Sunday?
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@Shila
Is this a joke? I’m confused.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@borz_kriffle
Is this a joke? I’m confused.
If you were confused over animals having free will. I am not surprised you are confused about needing to translate Catholic Apolegetic’s reply to your pet.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@Shila
I was asking for myself, actually. I’ve never liked the idea of owning an animal, though I may try for a pet someday if I can genuinely convince it that it’s living in nature. I’m looking into millipedes, but I gotta sort out my housing first :/
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@borz_kriffle
I was asking for myself, actually. I’ve never liked the idea of owning an animal, though I may try for a pet someday if I can genuinely convince it that it’s living in nature. I’m looking into millipedes, but I gotta sort out my housing first :/
Knowing the answer to your question about animals having free will will not help your pet if it cannot be translated for it to understand.
CatholicApologetics
CatholicApologetics's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 96
0
1
7
CatholicApologetics's avatar
CatholicApologetics
0
1
7
-->
@Shila
@borz_kriffle
I will try to keep the language very simple and make it easy to understand.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@Shila
I don’t have a pet, I literally just said that
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@borz_kriffle
I don’t have a pet, I literally just said that
But you also said you would get a pet if you could convince it that it’s living in nature (free will).
though I may try for a pet someday if I can genuinely convince it that it’s living in nature.

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@CatholicApologetics
I will try to keep the language very simple and make it easy to understand.
Depending on your skill. You might convert the pet before the owner.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@Shila
Well then I don’t really need to explain it to a future pet that I don’t have yet and won’t ever have to explain free will to (because legitimately why would i)?

I’m not going to talk to a millipede, you’re the only person who mentioned talking to animals at all.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@borz_kriffle
Well then I don’t really need to explain it to a future pet that I don’t have yet and won’t ever have to explain free will to (because legitimately why would i)?

I’m not going to talk to a millipede, you’re the only person who mentioned talking to animals at all.

You are the only one who asked if animals have free will and did Jesus die for them as well

Do animals have free will? If not, what is free will defined as? If so, can they sin, and did Jesus die for them as well?
The reply to that would be useless unless it could be translated for the animal to understand.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,920
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@CatholicApologetics
Well done CA, I'm impressed.

My question is around what you meant when you said you will "address a significant topic within the Catholic Church". Are you saying this is the position of the Church or is it your own position, speaking as a Catholic. 

Is there consensus within the Church regarding this, or are there multiple perspectives within Catholicism regarding the subject?  There are about 1.4 billion Catholics, I would think there would inevitably be a considerable amount of diversity of opinion and understanding.






CatholicApologetics
CatholicApologetics's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 96
0
1
7
CatholicApologetics's avatar
CatholicApologetics
0
1
7
-->
@Sidewalker
Thank you for your appreciation. When I mentioned “my aim is to address a significant topic within the Catholic Church,” I meant that these Sunday School or classes would cover any topic I consider “significant” in relation to the faith. For instance, an example of a significant topic could be the belief that watching pornography is morally permissible, which I might address. Alternatively, it could be a question posed by a person, as seen in today’s post.

Regarding the specific topic of whether the atonement of Jesus was necessary and why God doesn’t remove free will, I believe the general consensus aligns with my response. In the past, I’ve personally researched this topic and sought guidance from spiritual mentors regarding related questions. It seems that this is a widely held belief. Of course, it’s unlikely that everyone will share the same ideas and beliefs, but from an apologetic perspective, I would approach the question as I did today.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@Shila
Are you suggesting that things only matter if we can understand them? Because while I may not be able to tell a millipede that it has free will, they will still have it. I just want to know if they do, according to Christian’s at least.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@borz_kriffle
Are you suggesting that things only matter if we can understand them? Because while I may not be able to tell a millipede that it has free will, they will still have it. I just want to know if they do, according to Christian’s at least.

Read my first reply: Knowing the answer to your question about animals having free will,  will not help your pet if it cannot be translated for it to understand.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@Shila
Read the literal reply you have in your reply, the one I just wrote. It’s not FOR my nonexistent pet (why would I want to know something for the sake of informing an unlikely pet about it?), it’s for me. Just me. No animals, no translators, nothing. Please just read what I’m saying.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,751
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@borz_kriffle
Read the literal reply you have in your reply, the one I just wrote. It’s not FOR my nonexistent pet (why would I want to know something for the sake of informing an unlikely pet about it?), it’s for me. Just me. No animals, no translators, nothing. Please just read what I’m saying.

You mentioned your concern a lot of Christians has no problem with harming animals in any way.

Do animals have free will? If not, what is free will defined as? If so, can they sin, and did Jesus die for them as well?

The reason I ask this is because I see a lot of Christian’s with a very human-centric mindset, and it’s odd to me that someone who supposedly cares so much for life has no problem with harming animals in any way. I’m wondering if they possibly see themselves as superior, and if free will is the determining factor here.
The reply to your question “Do animals have free will? If not, what is free will defined as? If so, can they sin, and did Jesus die for them as well? “ would be useless unless it could be translated for the animal to understand.
borz_kriffle
borz_kriffle's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 30
0
0
5
borz_kriffle's avatar
borz_kriffle
0
0
5
-->
@Shila
this is so stupid, I’m not entertaining you any more.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 6,135
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@ILikePie5
Just ask me about Christianity. He fucked it up.

Why did God feel the need to let the Kikes murder Jesus for our sins instead of just forgiving us directly.

He mentioned God's grace but he didn't state what reason was there to not just forgive.

God being all Good is a Just God. I won't go too deep into the topic of Justice but him being a just a god means there needs to be some punishment for sin. Death is the first punishment for sin and was given to all of mankind.

Later it was sacrifices of animals. It's where the concept of a scape goat came from. Anyway unlike some religions that teach that underneath it all,  we are ultimately good, Christianity recognizes that humans are naturally evil and we must fight against our own nature.

Jesus is God in flesh. A goat might be enough of a price for a man's sins but the sacrifice of God himself is so great that it pays for everyone's sins.

Like op said though. God does believe in free will so we don't have to accept the sacrifice of the God man as payment for our sin. We are allowed to live in our sin. Allowed to continue it as well.

God is Just. No sin goes unanswered. Even nations get punished for sinning, and God allows the sin to continue as long as possible. America replaced God with degeneracy and Marxism. God did wait until America was about to completely collapse before installing  trump as president because he believes in free will, but also will step in to save his people at the last second.

That bullet that almost hit Trump was where the collapse would have began. The complete destruction of America. As God literally allowed it to come within  an inch of happening.

So he demands justice. America slipped into degeneracy and evil so we deserved for our sons to be transitioned, for the borders to be open and for Islamic terrorists to be invited in.

Now with all the public concerts to Christianity, God has stepped in to save us through an imperfect servant in Trump. The same way he allowed Moses to save the Jews, Moses being a huge piece of shit who was a nlknown murderer, slave holder and probably rapist as well.