The Fatima Sun miracle.

I work in the healthcare industry, 

And if someone wants to believe in miracles, it wouldn't be difficult to dupe them.

Another is that I saw the medical documents of an unborn baby's ultrasound that the doctor said the baby didn't have any kidneys.  The church prayed and the kid developed kidneys.  Another is an old lady in the church was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and was given 4 months max to live.  That was 2 years ago.  These can be explained away by someone who is skeptical but there are many more that don't involve medical issues but I use medical miracles since they can defy science.

What was the content of your rushed and mumbled prayer while also being  busy and preoccupied with your sound system?

Like I said, I used to run the sound equipment for the church so at the time, I had to use the same sound equipment from the church building out at the camp site.  So I was rushing right after service to start wrapping up cords, microphones, speakers, the soundboard, etc.  The next service was the next night at the camp, so I needed everything in order so I didn't have to make a trip back into town if I forgot something.  

People fake illness for a variety of reasons, and the use of props like walking aids and neck collars is popular.

I'm guessing that she didn't have a bad leg at all.

Just waited for the right moment to become the centre of attention and recover miraculously.

"The sun, at one moment surrounded with scarlet flame, at another aureoled in yellow and deep purple, seemed to be in an exceedingly swift and whirling movement, at times appearing to be loosened from the sky and to be approaching the earth, strongly radiating heat." —  Domingos Pinto Coelho, writing for the Catholic newspaper Ordem. (1)

"The silver sun, enveloped in the same gauzy grey light, was seen to whirl and turn in the circle of broken clouds [.. The light turned a beautiful blue, as if it had come through the stained-glass windows of a cathedral, and spread itself over the people who knelt with outstretched hands [...] people wept and prayed with uncovered heads, in the presence of a miracle they had awaited. The seconds seemed like hours, so vivid were they." —  Reporter for the Lisbon newspaper O Dia. (2)

"The sun's disc did not remain immobile. This was not the sparkling of a heavenly body, for it spun round on itself in a mad whirl when suddenly a clamor was heard from all the people. The sun, whirling, seemed to loosen itself from the firmament and advance threateningly upon the earth as if to crush us with its huge fiery weight. The sensation during those moments was terrible." —  De Marchi attributes this description to Almeida Garrett, Professor of Natural Sciences at Coimbra University.(6) Theologian Father Stanley L. Jaki wrote that it was actually given by José Almeida Garrett, a young lawyer, and is often mistakenly attributed to his father, a professor of natural sciences at the University of Coimbra,[3] named Gonçalo de Almeida Garrett.[4] (would like to note that it is understood if you want to discredit this account due to the disputing of source)

"As if like a bolt from the blue, the clouds were wrenched apart, and the sun at its zenith appeared in all its splendor. It began to revolve vertiginously on its axis, like the most magnificent firewheel that could be imagined, taking on all the colors of the rainbow and sending forth multicolored flashes of light, producing the most astounding effect. This sublime and incomparable spectacle, which was repeated three distinct times, lasted for about ten minutes. The immense multitude, overcome by the evidence of such a tremendous prodigy, threw themselves on their knees." —  Manuel Formigão, a professor at the seminary at Santarém, and a priest. (6)

"I feel incapable of describing what I saw. I looked fixedly at the sun, which seemed pale and did not hurt my eyes. Looking like a ball of snow, revolving on itself, it suddenly seemed to come down in a zig-zag, menacing the earth. Terrified, I ran and hid myself among the people, who were weeping and expecting the end of the world at any moment." —  Rev. Joaquim Lourenço, describing his boyhood experience in Alburitel, 18 kilometres (11 mi) from Fátima.(5)

(should be noted I excluded an account from a Afonso Lopes Vieira since it didn’t give any details over the event)

Here we can see the eye witnesses disagree on numerous things including the color, the sound (some described a sound and others omitted it, although this is expected with eye-witnesses accounts) this seems to be a mass-hallucination to me.

Well I ask how you came across this knowledge, and how is this claim falsifiable? It’s simply not falsifiable soo it’s not a valid hypothesis

Okay and how is this claim falsifiable? And I don’t think understanding is equivalent to what you see in a hallucination 

I’m not asking if the eye-witnesses are falsifiable, I’m asking if the claim “what they saw were dependent on their faith” is falsifiable

Shila I’m not asking if what they described is falsifiable. The statement you made “What was revealed to them was based on their faith.” is that falsifiable?

Shila please re-read my question, that wasn’t what I was asking 

Shila I’m not asking if what they described is falsifiable. The statement you made “What was revealed to them was based on their faith.” is that falsifiable?

Saying you can’t prove it isn’t the same as saying it’s falsifiable, science doesn’t prove anything, instead it falsifies different hypothesis until it finds a hypothesis it can’t falsify. But then for a hypothesis to be considered you have to point out a way it could be falsified.

a phenomenon is not considered scientific unless it is testable through empirical experimentation, which then determines its truth or falsity.

Gravity isn’t even really “proven” yet it is just about as close to proven as any hypothesis can be in a scientific framework, which is why it’s called a theory.What is the scientific proof for gravity?

An apple falling from a tree doesn’t prove gravity, it simply proves that apples fall from trees, we don’t need science to prove that. What science does is it hypothesizes why it falls from the tree, not if it falls from the tree. And one of the hypothesis, and the most accepted one is gravity and that’s because it’s a hypothesis that has evidence supporting it and has never been disproven or “torn down” by the scientific method.

Yes it did lead to the discovery of gravity, but it wasn’t the Apple falling that gave us the main understanding of gravity, instead gravity was simply a hypothesis to explain the experienced phenomenon. And the reason gravity is a valid hypothesis is that it’s falsifiable and yet all the attempts to falsify it have failed so the hypothesis has stood.

But that was all that Newton saw, a falling apple.

But that was all that Newton saw, a falling apple.

Does not follow that the apple proved gravity, nothing has proved gravity. There has been evidence that supported but not proved

You appear to have missed  my question. I asked for the content of the prayer you said for the girls leg.