Muslims protest Christmas in Germany and commit acts of terror

Author: WyIted
Islam
jihad

Posts

Total: 153
#31
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,306
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
You aren't going to get anywhere defending you bigotry with me, let's just be done with this inane conversation, here is what I think about it.

I think it's interesting that you identify "against homosexuality" as your "sexual preference".

If you ask a normal straight man what his sexual preference is, the straightforward answer they will give is "heterosexual".

When the answer is "against homosexuality", I just think that is an unusual answer to a simple question, it strikes me that the individual is not exactly comfortable simply claiming to be heterosexual, it implies the person has issues that need to be dealt with, I think.

As Shakespear said, "Methinks the lady doth protesteth too much".  
Topic's author
#32
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 7,521
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Mall
@Sidewalker
You are against homosexuality, is that right?

What exactly does it mean to be "against homosexuality"?
I don't know what he means but I assume he is asking me if I want to fuck him, in which case I politely decline. I am against homosexuality and choose not to engage in it, though there is certainly nothing wrong with same sex attraction.
#33
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,306
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@WyIted
You are against homosexuality, is that right?

What exactly does it mean to be "against homosexuality"?
I don't know what he means but I assume he is asking me if I want to fuck him, in which case I politely decline. I am against homosexuality and choose not to engage in it, though there is certainly nothing wrong with same sex attraction.
So, mall is trolling again?

Mall, be advised, I'm a heterosexual, no action here.
#34
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Sidewalker
Let's let the person I asked explain. It was initially directed towards that individual.
#35
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Shila
Let's let the person I asked explain. It was initially directed towards that individual.
#36
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@WyIted
Ok so you support homosexuality ok. Somebody said you would support a group that persecute gay people.  I guess that's wrong.

Yes, no need to play dumb with what supporting and being against something means. Like people are against Trump, against pro life, now you all will have to support Trump in the states. 
Topic's author
#37
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 7,521
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Mall
Ok so you support homosexuality ok. Somebody said you would support a group that persecute gay people. I guess that's wrong.
I most certainly do not support any form of faggotry. Being a faggot goes against the bible. I think I made this clear, hopefully I don't offend people with same sex attraction but being a faggot is unacceptable 
#38
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,835
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Sidewalker
None of the verses are about homosexuality, Jesus never said a word about homosexuality, not one word.

There is no reason whatsoever to think that Jesus' was "against homosexuality".

I think it is kind of sad when a person can't define themself except by referring to others, I'm a heterosexual, see it's not that hard to do.

I really don't think "against homosexual" is an orientation, it's a bigotry, sure, if you are needy that way then fine, but I really don't think you can call Christ a bigot.

What does your bigotry make of these verses:
John 13:23: "One of them, the disciple whom Jesus loved, was reclining next to Him"
John 21:7: "Then the disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, 'It is the Lord!'"
John 21:20-22: "Peter turned and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them"

But what did Jesus mean, precisely, when he referred to “sexual immorality” as one of those defiling and excluding sins?

The Greek-English Lexicon Of The New Testament And Other Early Christian Literature (BDAG) defines the word porneia, translated in most Bibles as “sexual immorality”, as involving “unlawful sexual intercourse”. The Jewish law provides a long list of what constitutes unlawful sexual intercourse in Leviticus 18-20. According to those statutes, a man was forbidden to have sex with the following:

1. His neighbour’s wife (Leviticus 18:21)

2. Another man (Leviticus 18:22)

3. An animal (Leviticus 18:23)

4. His mother in law (Leviticus 20:11)

5. His daughter in law (Leviticus 20:12)

6. His sister (Leviticus 20:17)

Sex with any of these would be considered porneia – unlawful.

According to Jesus sex of this sort defiles a person and thus places them outside the worshipping community and outside the eternal kingdom of God.
Therefore it certainly cannot be argued that Jesus affirmed or was indifferent toward the issue of homosexual sex. Jesus clearly endorsed the Old Testament vision of marriage as an inviolable covenant between one man and one woman and he clearly viewed unlawful sex as being the sort of thing that defiled a person and placed them outside the kingdom of God. Jesus did not use the word “homosexuality” but neither did he use the word “incest” or “bestiality”. He did not need to. In using the Greek word porneia he identified with how the Jewish law delineated lawful and unlawful sex.

#39
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,835
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Sidewalker
I think it's interesting that you identify "against homosexuality" as your "sexual preference".
Already explained the difference between against homosexuality and sexual preference.
Being a homosexual or heterosexual is a sexual preference.
Going against homosexuality is a person who is opposed, disagrees to this free choice.
If you ask a normal straight man what his sexual preference is, the straightforward answer they will give is "heterosexual".
That would be the sexual preference of the individual.
Being a homosexual or heterosexual is a sexual preference.
When the answer is "against homosexuality", I just think that is an unusual answer to a simple question, it strikes me that the individual is not exactly comfortable simply claiming to be heterosexual, it implies the person has issues that need to be dealt with, I think.
Going against homosexuality is a person who is opposed, disagrees to this free choice.

#40
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,280
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
But.
But.
Ya just helping this fella out by having him come to a ummmm, a more civil country,  so he doesn't get hurt and like picked on in the country his from. 
Poor little fella. 
So ya Help him out,  andddddd, A fucking fortnight later he thinks he can like LAY DOWN THE LAW and shit. And he does shit that your country / his now country doesn't except.

Total Fucking wankers. 

Imagine starting shit in a place that helps you out.,
The fucking hyde of some cunts. 

His gonna be raped sooooooo hard in jail. 

You can be fore or against homosexuality.

Im against Musliminisum. 
Its not even a word. 

If your against Christianity you are a ( __________ )  ? 

If your against homosexuality you are a ( _____________ ) ? 

Is There such things as homosexual Muslims ? 

Im angry about this. 
Im steaming. 

Homosexual Muslims are prob the nice ones. 

 
#41
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,835
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Total Fucking wankers.

What religions do not support homosexuality?
So as far as I know, the only major religions condemning homosexuality or being transgender are Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, but many people in these religions have adapted their beliefs to move beyond this and fully support the LGBT community.

#42
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,280
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
-->
@Shila
Going against Muslim  isum is a person who is opposed,  disagree to this free choice. 

Doesn't work hey. 

Then what about 
Going against homosexual Muslims is a person opposed to so on and so on . 


#43
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
There are probably some gay muslims. There are gay Christians.
#44
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,280
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Im thinking like one maybe two tops. 

Hey what about interreligionrelationships.
Can a Christian have a relations with a Muslim. 

Hey. Do ya reckon god hates boys kissing boys more so then Christians and Muslims getting it on. ?

Then theres the homosexual Christian and Muslim inter relations.  
Thats like pure fucking evil. 
 
#45
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Boy kissing boy is the worst crime in the Bible.

But Christian boy kissing muslim boy is probably twice as bad, so its really really bad.
#46
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,835
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Im thinking like one maybe two tops. 

Hey what about interreligionrelationships.
Can a Christian have a relations with a Muslim.  

Hey. Do ya reckon god hates boys kissing boys more so then Christians and Muslims getting it on. ?

Then theres the homosexual Christian and Muslim inter relations.  
Thats like pure fucking evil. 
According to your examples a Christian cannot have relations with a Muslim. It will be pure fucking evil.
#47
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,280
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Imagine god trying to get the point across
 The point being. 
Christian boys kissing Christian boys isnt as ummmm, evil as christian boys  kissing Muslim boys.

You'd ask him . 
Whats the difference?  
His answer would be interesting.

Hang on. 
What happens if a muslim was ( thy neighbor )
And if a Muslim trespassers.
Do onto other Muslims. 

Inter religious stuff,  messes up non inter religious stuff. 

I dont know if im saying that right but 
#48
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 403
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Well, Jesus did say "Do to others what you want them to do to you".

So if boy wants to be kissed by other boys, he must...

No, bad thoughts! Sin. Sin. 
#49
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,835
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Imagine god trying to get the point across
 The point being. 
Christian boys kissing Christian boys isnt as ummmm, evil as christian boys  kissing Muslim boys.

You'd ask him .  
Whats the difference?  
His answer would be interesting.

Hang on. 
What happens if a muslim was ( thy neighbor )
And if a Muslim trespassers.
Do onto other Muslims. 

Inter religious stuff,  messes up non inter religious stuff. 

I dont know if im saying that right but 
What is the difference?
Christianity worships a convicted criminal Jesus who was crucified for his crimes.
Muslims worship a prophet Mohammad who had many wives and mistresses.
#50
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@WyIted
Ok so why are you against homosexuality?

This is what I'm asking about . Is it only because it's not biblical?
#51
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,306
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Mall
@Shila
Ok so why are you against homosexuality?

This is what I'm asking about . Is it only because it's not biblical?
Your “against homosexuality” position is just bigotry, and you bigots try to reference the New Testament to give credence to their bigotry, but your bigotry is not based on anything Jesus said or did, and it is it is not based on anything mentioned in the New Testament. Jesus' words and action taken in context, and the New Testament taken in context, certainly does not support exclusion of homosexuals, or being “against homosexuality”, nor does it specifically refer to homosexuality as a sin.

The Bible does teach that Love conquers all prejudice and overcomes all divisions among mankind. Love is love, it doesn't fit into neat little categories, and the Bible teaches that Love conquers all prejudice and overcomes all divisions among mankind. There is nothing unnatural about any shared love if that experience brings both partners into a fuller state of being, and the bigots who use the Bible to justify their bigotry don’t know what they are talking about, they in fact, are committing a sin, homosexuals are not.

While the Bible is nearly silent on homosexuality, but a majority of its content is devoted to how a Christian should behave, and compassion for others and social justice are the fundamental cornerstones of Christian ethics.  Throughout, the New Testament directs Christians to act with fairness, equity, love, and the rejection of legalism over compassion.

Being “against homosexuality” is in clear violation of what Jesus pointedly identified as one-half of God’s most important commandment: to love one’s neighbor as oneself.  Christ never said a single word about homosexuality, not one word. He said that we are all loved, valued, redeemed, and counted as precious, no matter how we might be looked upon by a prejudiced world. One thing he did do is tell us not to judge others, and he did that repeatedly.
Because there is no directive whatsoever in the Bible to marginalize and ostracize gay people, and the directive is clearly that we should not judge others, and have compassion for others, it is clearly the ”against homosexuality” bigots that are the ones sinning.



#52
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,849
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Sidewalker
Because there is no directive whatsoever in the Bible to marginalize and ostracize gay people.....


FK me! Have you ever read the bible for yourself. Both the Old and New Testaments condemns TO DEATH homosexuals to death as it does transvestites.
#53
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Sidewalker
Why do you support homosexuality?
#54
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,306
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Mall
Why do you support homosexuality?
Couple reasons, first, I'm not a bigot, and second, because the Bible tells us not to judge others, to have compassion, to achieve social justice, and to treat our neighbors the way we would want to be treated.

You talk about the Bible a lot, maybe you should try reading it some time, it's a Good Book.
#55
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,835
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Sidewalker
Because there is no directive whatsoever in the Bible to marginalize and ostracize gay people, and the directive is clearly that we should not judge others, and have compassion for others, it is clearly the ”against homosexuality” bigots that are the ones sinning.
Therefore it certainly cannot be argued that Jesus affirmed or was indifferent toward the issue of homosexual sex. Jesus clearly endorsed the Old Testament vision of marriage as an inviolable covenant between one man and one woman and he clearly viewed unlawful sex as being the sort of thing that defiled a person and placed them outside the kingdom of God. Jesus did not use the word “homosexuality” but neither did he use the word “incest” or “bestiality”. He did not need to. In using the Greek word porneia he identified with how the Jewish law delineated lawful and unlawful sex.

The Jewish law provides a long list of what constitutes unlawful sexual intercourse in Leviticus 18-20. According to those statutes, a man was forbidden to have sex with the following:

1. His neighbour’s wife (Leviticus 18:21)

2. Another man (Leviticus 18:22) (homosexuality)

3. An animal (Leviticus 18:23) (beastiality)

4. His mother in law (Leviticus 20:11)

5. His daughter in law (Leviticus 20:12)

6. His sister (Leviticus 20:17)

Sex with any of these would be considered porneia – unlawful.

#56
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,306
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
Because there is no directive whatsoever in the Bible to marginalize and ostracize gay people.....
FK me! Have you ever read the bible for yourself. Both the Old and New Testaments condemns TO DEATH homosexuals to death as it does transvestites.
As always, Stephen is completely full of shit, he doesn't know anything about the Bible, all he ever does is blather a bunch of made-up shit because he is an angry little man.

If he wants to show the New Testament verse that supports his delusional made up fantasy that the Bible supports his Bigotry, I'll walk all over his complete lack of knowledge about the Bible.

Who's your Daddy Stephen?






#57
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,306
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
The bot thinks Leviticus is in the New Testament LOL.


#58
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,835
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Sidewalker
The bot thinks Leviticus is in the New Testament LOL.

Jesus quoted from 24 different Old Testament books.
He quoted the Old Testament 78 times, the Pentateuch alone 26 times. He quoted from Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Psalms, Proverbs, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Amos, Jonah, Micah, and Malachi.

Therefore it certainly cannot be argued that Jesus affirmed or was indifferent toward the issue of homosexual sex. Jesus clearly endorsed the Old Testament vision of marriage as an inviolable covenant between one man and one woman and he clearly viewed unlawful sex as being the sort of thing that defiled a person and placed them outside the kingdom of God. Jesus did not use the word “homosexuality” but neither did he use the word “incest” or “bestiality”. He did not need to. In using the Greek word porneia he identified with how the Jewish law delineated lawful and unlawful sex.

The Jewish law provides a long list of what constitutes unlawful sexual intercourse in Leviticus 18-20. According to those statutes, a man was forbidden to have sex with the following:

1. His neighbour’s wife (Leviticus 18:21)

2. Another man (Leviticus 18:22) (homosexuality)

3. An animal (Leviticus 18:23) (beastiality)

4. His mother in law (Leviticus 20:11)

5. His daughter in law (Leviticus 20:12)

6. His sister (Leviticus 20:17)

Sex with any of these would be considered porneia – unlawful.

#59
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Sidewalker
Do you think the scriptures support homosexuality?
#60
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,835
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Mall
Do you think the scriptures support homosexuality?
The Jewish law provides a long list of what constitutes unlawful sexual intercourse in Leviticus 18-20. According to those statutes, a man was forbidden to have sex with the following:

1. His neighbour’s wife (Leviticus 18:21)

2. Another man (Leviticus 18:22) (homosexuality)

3. An animal (Leviticus 18:23) (beastiality)

4. His mother in law (Leviticus 20:11)

5. His daughter in law (Leviticus 20:12)

6. His sister (Leviticus 20:17)

Sex with any of these would be considered porneia – unlawful.