White privilege does not exist

Author: RemyBrown

Posts

Hot
Total: 145
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
"The more we can elevate black women, that’s going to be a beautiful thing.”
-Clark

"I want to say I’ve earned every single thing, but as a white person, there is privilege."
-Clark

The issue here is, do whites have an obligation to tell racists of all colors to say "you are wrong" when they try to Necro 1800's racial science based solely on skin color?

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,882
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
"The more we can elevate black women, that’s going to be a beautiful thing.”

"I want to say I’ve earned every single thing, but as a white person, there is privilege."

The issue here is, do whites have an obligation to tell racists of all colors to say "you are wrong" when they try to Necro 1800's racial science based solely on skin color?
Why are you singling out black women?
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,356
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
Even God picked the Jews as his chosen people.
So apparently you believe in Jew privilege
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,356
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
Feel free to parse her quotes down for us...

"The more we can elevate black women, that’s going to be a beautiful thing.”

"I want to say I’ve earned every single thing, but as a white person, there is privilege."
Privilege doesn't mean you didn't earn what you have, it means there are obstacles out there that other people face which you don't have to.

To me, it's as clear as daylight. Whites are patronizingly superior due to skin color and in the unique position to elevate people who are inferior due to their skin color.
Because you are seeing only what is convenient, not what others are actually saying.

Being in a position to help others =/= being superior to them.

A classless society is one of the cornerstones of MAGA.
Achieving a classless society is a nobel goal and  in my opinion should be our guiding principal on all matters of race. But having a nobel goal is not an excuse to ignore reality

It is not difficult to see how sickening it is when you've been told many times in your life (as nearly all black people have) to "go back to your country" despite standing in the only country you've ever known as your home - to be lectured by people who have never had that phrase uttered at them before and wouldn't even be able to contemplate it telling you how you're wrong for pointing out that there are in fact racial injustices in our society today that should be talked about.

So yeah, it's easy to preach about a colorless society when the color of your skin has never been a problem for you.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,882
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Double_R
Even God picked the Jews as his chosen people.
So apparently you believe in Jew privilege
Even God tried to create a privilege class by picking the Jews as his chosen people.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,785
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
Caitlyn Clark disagrees. As one of the very few good white WNBA players, it's clearly due to her skin color.
Her publicity is because she is white. Better players have been ignored because of their colour.
Please bot, share with us the names of the players that are better than Caitlyn Clark.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
The issue here is, do whites have an obligation to tell racists of all colors to say "you are wrong" when they try to Necro 1800's racial science based solely on skin color?
No, I don't think so. I think there is an obligation to be honest. Like if an employer says "you believe whites persecute blacks and that's the explanation for higher crime rates don't you". Then I think you have a moral obligation to say they are full of shit just because your grasp on reality is important and nobody has the right tonimpose their retarded thinking on you
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Double_R
@WyIted
There's no science that draws any correlation between skin color and the chance of growing up fatherless (or "unprivileged.)

This was definitively debunked in the 90's when statistical data showed Nigerian immigrants with African culture easily surpassing Americanized whites and blacks in almost every metric. Modern privilege has never been about nature (skin color) and has always been about nurture (culture)

The only reason why Americanized blacks are "unprivileged" is because they choose to live in a culture of poor education and fatherlessness. Their community practically exiles you if you even 'sound' educated, or chastise your mother for being a crap wife. Has nothing to do with skin color. Period.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,013
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@WyIted
nobody has the right to impose their retarded thinking on you
Sure they do. Thats why education is compulsory, so that retarded thinking can be imposed.

For example, I learned in school that Hitler was evil. Then some time later I listened to his speeches and I realized he was kinda cool.

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Shila
The idea that skin color determines success is not only outdated but fundamentally flawed. Look no further than Nigerian immigrants in the United States, who consistently outperform American-born whites and blacks across education and economic metrics. Nigerians arrive with strong cultural values that emphasize education, family stability, and personal responsibility, and they achieve remarkable success despite facing the same societal conditions and systemic challenges as everyone else. This isn’t a matter of race—it's a matter of culture. Success comes from the values you live by, not the color of your skin.

Thomas Sowell’s research proves this point even more clearly. Prior to the 1960s, Black American culture shared similar values to what we see in Nigerian immigrant households today. Back then, when systemic racism was an actual thing, literacy rates were high, two-parent families were the norm, and communities embraced personal responsibility and hard work. That changed with the rise of welfare programs, which, though well-intentioned, created incentives for fatherlessness and dependency. Cultural norms shifted, and as a result, the pursuit of education and family cohesion was undermined. It’s not racism holding people back today—it’s a cultural system full of the bigotry of soft expectations that rewards underachievement and punishes those who dare to succeed or appear anywhere near "culturally white."

The truth is, tunneling the blame of insignificant external factors like 2024 racism ignores the power of personal choice and cultural values. If success were about skin color, Nigerians would face the same struggles as American-born blacks. But they don’t, and haven't for many decades, because they’ve chosen to participate in a culture that prioritizes progress. It’s time to stop pretending that systemic racism or “privilege” determines everything and recognize that culture and values are what truly matter. If you want to succeed, align yourself with a culture that rewards ambition, not one that "elevates" mediocrity.

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,013
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
 Look no further than Nigerian immigrants in the United States, who consistently outperform American-born whites and blacks across education and economic metrics.
Can you prove that two groups faced same racism, given that they didnt even grow up in same country?

That changed with the rise of welfare programs, which, though well-intentioned, created incentives for fatherlessness and dependency.
Werent those imposed by white people?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea

Weren't those imposed by white people?
Yes, racist whites who wanted to revive the 1800's culture of low expectations for American born. And still play the grift today.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,013
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
So are we supposed to trust this "source"? Where is proof that this source speaks the truth?
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,356
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
There's no science that draws any correlation between skin color and the chance of growing up fatherless
Growing up fatherless objectively, statistically, makes you more likely to abandon your children.

Therefore, forcefully taking fathers away from their children from an entire community is certain to result in that community having significantly higher rates of fatherlessness.

Guess what the biggest event in American history of pulling father's away from their children was? Hint: it has nothing to do with Nigerians.

The only reason why Americanized blacks are "unprivileged" is because they choose to live in a culture of poor education and fatherlessness. 
This has got to be the stupidest comment I've ever read from you, and that's saying something.

Poor education and fatherlessness is not something one chooses, it is the hand that was dealt to them as a child.

Being dealt a poor hand early in life makes success later in life much more difficult. This is basic common sense.


Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,013
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Double_R
This has got to be the stupidest comment I've ever read from you, and that's saying something.

Poor education and fatherlessness is not something one chooses, it is the hand that was dealt to them as a child.
He conceded that racism still exists in form of welfare programs.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Double_R
Poor education and fatherlessness is not something one chooses, 
Then this is the stupidest comment I ever heard from you. It reeks of ethnocentrism, and shows a complete lack of awareness for the standard stigmas in that culture toward education. They choose that culture because otherwise, they would have the same outcomes as the Nigerians who have a completely separate culture. Your skin doesn't dictate your culture. YOU DO.

This is basic common sense. You don't get dealt your culture, you choose to accept it when you become of age to do so. And the last thing racist whites should be doing is subsidizing a broken culture that discourages fathers and education with tax funds....
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,622
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
Whites are patronizingly superior due to skin color and in the unique position to elevate people who are inferior due to their skin color.
Aka the “white savior narrative.”

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,882
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@cristo71
Aka the “white savior narrative.”

In the US, Nigerians are the most highly educated of all groups, with 61 per cent holding at least a bachelors degree compared with 31 per cent of the total foreign-born population and 32 per cent of the US-born population, according to 2017 data from the Migratio


cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,622
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Shila
Your posting style definitely favors quantity over quality.
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,356
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
You don't get dealt your culture, you choose to accept it when you become of age to do so.
By that point it's already been ingrained into you so not only will it take a full effort on the part of the individual that could be spent elsewhere, but it can also serve to alienate one's own support system since that support will likely not come along for the journey.

This is called a disadvantage, and it has real life effects on real people that can easily be demonstrated and traced over time.
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,622
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
@Double_R
I’ve been seeing pushback, both anecdotal and academic, against the stereotype of the “missing black father” in America:


Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Double_R
I get that, but objectively speaking, Nigerians grow up in far more poverty and lack education opportunities, yet make the transition to a productive culture once they arrive in America. The fact that they do not associate with black American culture speaks volumes.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@cristo71
Yes of course. The point is: just because you grow up fatherless doesn't mean you have no ability due to your skin color to choose to discard a broken culture.

There are choices that transcend skin color. And clearly, they didn't need "the great white savior" to make the choice to leave a toxic culture that promoted fatherlessness and limited education. Or at least the Nigerians sure as hell did not.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@cristo71
I see disgusting parallels in the way Native Americans and people of color or POC have been treated by 'liberal' white communities. A major reason why many Native Americans continue to live in poverty is that white communities, in their attempts to 'save' them, often prevent space for Native Americans to address and solve their own issues. This myopic ethnocentrism needs to change if we truly want a unified country, where everyone is able to thrive within their own culture, rather than conforming to, or being subsidized by what racist whites deem "the appropriate way of life."

If the last election taught these liberal whites anything, it is that there is no "appropriate unifying white culture"
They can call MAGA a "garbage culture" all day long, but it doesn't negate the fact that a singular objective skin culture is, (and was,) never a real thing. Nothing needs to be "uplifted" by these self-important "white saviors." 

Clark is dead wrong.



ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,060
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Greyparrot
.........but it doesn't negate the fact that skin culture is, and was never a real thing......
Keep telling yourself lies and you will become just another of King Trumpets, MAFiA cult members

King......................immorality..........................King
--------------------------MAFiA-----------------------------
King....................immorality............................King

All-for-the-king and king-for-their-self is a win-lose scenario. Brain as brawn > barbarism

All-for-one and one-for-all is a win-win scenario. Meta-space mind as intelligence > wholism






Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@ebuc
lol, so how did we have a civil war if everyone with white skin voted Democrat and supported slavery? (spoiler, they did not)  

skin culture is a myth.
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,622
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
Clark is dead wrong.
Yes well, she is young and completely brainwashed by Robin DeAngelo et al most likely…


cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,622
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
skin culture is a myth.
How do you define “skin culture”? I ask because I’ve never heard that exact term…

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,264
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@cristo71
The historical idea of "skin culture" suggested that all white people shared a single, unified culture just because they have similar skin color. But this idea is easily debunked because white people come from many different ethnic backgrounds, like Irish, Italian, Jewish, and more, each with their own distinct traditions and histories. It's also rooted in colonial slaver history, where the concept of a mythical "white culture" was used to justify oppression and dominance. America today is composed of both colonists and immigrants, so there is no basis for the case that this "unifying culture" exists today anywhere in America.

The "white privilege" refers to the advantages people seen as white often get in society, like easier access to jobs or fairer treatment by police. But this idea is equally debunked, mostly because it oversimplifies complex issues by focusing primarily on race without considering major factors like class, culture, or personal experience. Both of these postmodern concepts fail to recognize the diversity within racial groups and how actual privilege and culture work.

The only reason I can see why these shrill white "liberals" perpetuate the idea of privilege is to hold on to the myth that their skin color somehow makes them more than what they really are.

In other words, a racist.
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,622
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
The historical idea of "skin culture" suggested that all white people shared a single, unified culture just because they have similar skin color. But this idea is easily debunked because white people come from many different ethnic backgrounds, like Irish, Italian, Jewish, and more, each with their own distinct traditions and histories. It's also rooted in colonial slaver history, where the concept of a mythical "white culture" was used to justify oppression and dominance. America today is composed of both colonists and immigrants, so there is no basis for the case that this exists today anywhere in America.
If that is the case, then yeah, “skin culture” is a dumb concept. People groups have historically been delineated by nationality, not skin color. Then there are subcultures within nationalities by region, religion, economic class, and urban/rural delineations.

Chattel slavery erased these delineations for African slaves, so they just became “black” rather than Nigerian, Kenyan, Cameroonian, etc. Somehow, this clumsy, broad brush identity solely by general appearance spread to every other group.

The "white privilege" refers to the advantages people seen as white often get in society, like easier access to jobs or fairer treatment by police. But this idea is equally debunked, mostly because it oversimplifies complex issues by focusing primarily on race without considering major factors like class, culture, or personal experience. Both of these postmodern concepts fail to recognize the diversity within racial groups and how actual privilege and culture work.
Actually, this concept of “white privilege” originated entirely from a brief essay titled “Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” authored by a feminist seeking to spread her insights on gender inequality over to race. The essay lists various examples which can all be distilled down to what I would call “minority disadvantage” rather than “white privilege.” Ever since her essay, self important hacks have taken her observations and run with them well past the end zone (think Forrest Gump).

The only reason I can see why these shrill white "liberals" perpetuate the idea of privilege is to hold on to the myth that their skin color somehow makes them more than what they really are.
At risk of oversimplifying the complex, I believe this is the result of the rise of critical theory (race in this case) in academia occurring simultaneously with the decline in traditional religious dogma. “Nature abhors a vacuum.”