CEO shooter's manifesto in this thread.

Author: WyIted

Posts

Total: 72
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 331
2
2
4
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
2
2
4
-->
@Shila
Exactly my point.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@WyIted
They really need to be eliminated then.
How do you eliminate the CEO with private security?

I would support a more free market approach to fixing the issue. 
Lol, so everyone thinks that once the CEOs are all dead, their preferred method will be implemented to fix the problem. Once the revolution is over and the Reign of Terror begins, some people are going to be very disappointed.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,863
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@RemyBrown
Sure, but the problem was removed for decades; whining about it is like BLM whining about slavery.
Not really true, there is still a lot of economic interventiomism. 
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,863
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Savant
How do you eliminate the CEO with private security?
Using OSINT.

Get into his circle pretending to be a reporter interested in his philothranpic efforts, gain an interview and then PEW PEW, or poison a coffee and get away. I listen to as many red teaming stories as possible and there are several ways to do it for a high IQ individual. Guns also have been fitted to drones with the ability to remote fire for those with bad social skills

As far as preferred system, both a single payer solution and and ancap solution would be an improvement on the status quo. I also think an ideologically consistent governing body would be better holistically than implementing a Mish mash of political theories.
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 331
2
2
4
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
2
2
4
-->
@WyIted
Not really true, there is still a lot of economic interventiomism. 
With healthcare, where?
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,901
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@RemyBrown
Not really true, there is still a lot of economic interventiomism. 
With healthcare, where?
The Democratic Party.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,863
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@RemyBrown
With healthcare, where?
Did you know that regulations and subsidies exist?
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,901
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@WyIted
With healthcare, where?
Did you know that regulations and subsidies exist?
Not in Trump’s concept of a plan for healthcare reform.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,863
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Shila
They do. He is no libertian. Just look at his policies
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@WyIted
Get into his circle pretending to be a reporter interested in his philothranpic efforts, gain an interview and then PEW PEW, or poison a coffee and get away.
If you're going to that much trouble, why not go after the company itself, not an individual CEO? Record them admitting to illegal activity, get records exposing how they deny claims, etc. If the CEO is dead, you can't subpoena him.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,863
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Savant
I guess the point of going after the CEO is to send a  message to individuals who make decisions that if they make evil decisions they might be killed. After this happened an I durance co.pany who was going to refuse to pay for anesthesia throughout an entire surgery, I guess they wanted people to be operated on without it. We'll they decided people can have anesthesia for their entire surgery so maybe his way did create some good. 


Me personally, I would attack the company and not the individual and short their stock prior to the attack. 
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,901
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Savant
Get into his circle pretending to be a reporter interested in his philothranpic efforts, gain an interview and then PEW PEW, or poison a coffee and get away.
If you're going to that much trouble, why not go after the company itself, not an individual CEO? Record them admitting to illegal activity, get records exposing how they deny claims, etc. If the CEO is dead, you can't subpoena him.
How does an individual take on a multi billion dollar company like Healthcare? Guess he wasn’t thinking that far.