I've decided to come out as Marxist

Author: RemyBrown

Posts

Total: 35
Topic's author
#1
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
The right has been telling me that anyone who votes against Trump and prefers Harris to Trump is a Marxist.

Alright; I don't care about the label; I'm a Marxist as well as about half the country (actually there would be more Marxists than non Marxists in the US).

There are a lot of Marxists in the US, I'm one of them, and there's strength in numbers if you equate democrat with Marxist.

I'm a Marxist because I would rather see starving kids get food in their stomachs than give tax cuts to globalists like George Soros.

Anybody that disagrees with this statement values George Soros'es tax cuts more than the life of a starving child.
Topic's author
#2
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
Anybody that disagrees with this statement values George Soros'es tax cuts more than the life of a starving child.
And is therefore a Soros Simp.
#3
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,309
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@RemyBrown

Yes, Karl Marx was a highly intelligent individual whose insights and analyses continue to resonate across multiple fields. His ability to connect complex ideas and his critical approach to society and economy showcase his intellectual prowess. But remember that Republicans think that stupid rich people should be our leaders.
#4
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
The right has been telling me that anyone who votes against Trump and prefers Harris to Trump is a Marxist.

No they haven't

I'm a Marxist because I would rather see starving kids get food in their stomachs than give tax cuts to globalists like George Soros.

Yes because marxists are so good at feeding children LOL

Anybody that disagrees with this statement values George Soros'es tax cuts more than the life of a starving child.

What if they value tax cuts because they know what happens to countries which have high tax rates such as China, Venezuela and North Korea?

Honestly you also know. You have seen the economic freedom index. SO why do you hate kids and want them to starve by turning the United States into a country that goes lower in the economic freedom index?

Why not, just be a good person?

#5
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 347
Posts: 10,131
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@WyIted
Yes because marxists are so good at feeding children LOL
Yeah, its called food stamps.

A marxist invention which reduced hunger in USA and in all countries which applied it.
#6
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 347
Posts: 10,131
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Oh snap

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is our nation’s most effective tool for combating hunger. It plays a critical role in reducing poverty, improving health and economic outcomes, supporting people who are paid low wages, and serving as the first line of defense against hunger during economic downturns. Access to SNAP provides families with the money they need to purchase groceries, freeing up their limited resources to spend more on other basic needs such as housing, utilities, and medical and child care.
As the Senate Agriculture Committee prepares to hold a hearing on nutrition programs in the 2023 farm bill, there are a few important points to consider.
SNAP is highly effective at reducing hunger and is a powerful anti-poverty tool, especially during times of economic downturn. SNAP reduces hunger by as much as 30 percent and is even more effective among children. Studies have shown that hunger among children fell by roughly one-third after their families received SNAP benefits for six months. Hunger was poised to soar early in the COVID-19 pandemic, but SNAP’s structure and policy changes made it easier for families to access SNAP during this period. Hunger stayed level in 2020 — unlike during the Great Recession, when hunger surged from 11.1 percent to 14.7 percent. SNAP also narrowed racial disparities during the pandemic: from late December 2020 through December 2021, the share of people who didn’t have enough to eat fell 7.8 percentage points for Black adults and 6 percentage points for Hispanic adults, compared to 3.1 percentage points for non-Hispanic white adults.

#7
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Best.Korea
Yeah, its called food stamps.

A marxist invention which reduced hunger in USA and in all countries which applied it.
Chinese and russians starving after succesfully implementing food programs



#8
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 347
Posts: 10,131
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@WyIted
Chinese and russians starving after succesfully implementing food programs
They used too much marxism. Some marxism is good. Too much of anything is bad. State owned farms, bad idea lol

As we can see, marxism used in moderation in USA reduced hunger significantly, so marxism used in moderation is better than pure small government crapitalism.
#9
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Best.Korea
What you are referring to is called a social safety net not marxism.

you made another post about being a loser who wants to kill themselves I saw. you literally can't get a job and have 18 hours a day to research anything you want. Have you considered maybe spending less time jerking off to child porn and more time reading Das Capitol
#10
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 347
Posts: 10,131
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@WyIted
What you are referring to is called a social safety net not marxism
I am pretty sure Marx would support SNAP. Marx cared for the suffering of workers.

you made another post about being a loser who wants to kill themselves I saw. you literally can't get a job and have 18 hours a day to research anything you want. Have you considered maybe spending less time jerking off to child porn and more time reading Das Capitol
I dont remember saying that, but whatever. If you read "Das Capitol" you would see that Marx writes mostly about workers suffering in bad conditions.
#11
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,309
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service, 10.2 percent (13.5 million) of US household has food insecurity in 2021.
China hunger statistics for 2022 was 0.00%, a 2.5% decline from 2021. China will buy the USA after Trump makes it his biggest bankruptcy. I hope they will make me a Province manager when they take over.
Topic's author
#12
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
-->
@WyIted
The right has been telling me that anyone who votes against Trump and prefers Harris to Trump is a Marxist.

No they haven't

A quote from Greyperrot:

I guarantee if half of Texas invaded New York, they would lose their Marxist culture.

To Greyperrot, left of center = Marxist.  This is also accurate of you in the correct context.

#13
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@RemyBrown
if you interpret GP's statement that way than do not reproduce. You have an IQ lower than most black men
#14
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 347
Posts: 10,131
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Insults sure became popular again.

I guess this is just society falling apart before the strength of destructive Gods lol

"The problem with peace is that humans dont want it."
Topic's author
#15
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
-->
@WyIted
 You have an IQ lower than most black men
Would you say that of the people that liked every one of my comments on this thread (and to prove that the current one like isn't me, I will like all of my comments on this thread so you can see that someone else liked it (so you should be able to see 2 likes)?  I think one of the likes is from FLRW, who went college (Harvard) and has an LGBTQ studies degree (not the conventional LGBTQ degree; a Lets Go Build Trucks Quickly degree (aka engineering)).  Ivy League; so woke and snowflake that Ben Shapiro went there.

You can't understand my argument and come up with a decent rebuttal except having to resort to childish, SJW insults; I would say that's pretty low IQ behavior right there.

The right on UHC:

Me: Lets have UHC!

MAGA: That's SOCIALISM!

Me: Norway has it and they aren't socialist!

MAGA: They are capitalist with social programs!  They have MORE economic freedom than the US!

(

Me: Alright; lets have capitalism with social programs and gain economic freedom!

MAGA: NO!  That's SOCIALISM!!

Me: Norway has it!

MAGA: They are capitalist with social programs!  They have MORE economic freedom than the US!

)

This part repeats indefinitely.
#16
Moozer325
Moozer325's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 1,120
3
2
8
Moozer325's avatar
Moozer325
3
2
8
-->
@RemyBrown
Gonna be honest, I don't think I've actually read any of his stuff, it's something I should really get around to eventually. I don't know how much his ideas differ with the reality of communist regimes throughout history, but I'll tell you now that I don't agree with straight up soviet communism. Almost every economy in the history of the world is a mixed economy, and I generally lean more towards socialism when given the choice between free markets and government intervention. However just as unbridled capitalism is doomed to fail, I believe the polar opposite is likewise.
Topic's author
#17
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
-->
@Barney
@whiteflame
@WyIted
Oh; I see you gave 3 likes to your stupidist comment on here (and 0 to the other ones just to show how desperate you are for validation that you have to inflate your approval using spam accounts).  Your other comments here you were at least making points where I could see someone agreeing with you.  I guarantee you, every like I've gotten on here that I can remember (except the ones where I'm open that I liked my own comment) were from other users.  Your likes are inflated by multi accounts that you control and the mods should look into it; I've tagged a few (especially since they came all at once).  So voter fraud that I believe is legitimate (and I have screenshots to prove this in case he tries to fix his mistake in hiding up voter fraud which I should have grabbed last time but hey; not even me (the cream of the crop) is perfect).  But you learn from mistakes.  I think Wylted is doing voter fraud (either that or he is so desperate to find conservatives who actually like his stuff just to inflate the numbers).

In other words:

My muscles:  image1

Wylted's muscles: image2

Note: Anytime Wylted gets any likes at all; anyone reading this comment should assume they are all his own multi accounts that do it.  I think the mods should investigate Wylted for multi accounting.

And then he will call DART a leftist haven (which is code for a reality haven) and cry and complain about being the victim like a little child.  You how these people react to critisism; it's like Napolean Dynomite challanging the Rock to an arm wrestling contest (except he claims it's rigged when the Rock wins and the Rock is somehow cheating).

He's not cheating; he's just better at his craft of being strong; just like my craft of being smart is better than Wylted.  At least Napolean has enough common sense to either not challange the Rock or if he does, then he knows he will lose and accept it.  Wylted doesn't have the guts because this is Wylted.  Not just a a chicken, but a roasted chicken, served up by yours truly.

This chicken might still be alive and might need more roasting.  I will let the main course decide for himself; I'm only a chef, but bon-appitit.
Topic's author
#18
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
-->
@WyIted
Because I think everyone watching this can agree with me when I say this.

1. Harris can say, "Kick out the whites.  America is for natives and POCs only.  I'm not racist; whites have Europe.  I'm just looking out for my people!" and I would call her out on it and state how horrible she is and how much I would not vote for her (I would even prefer Trump to Harris if this happens), but if Trump says, "Kick out the blacks; they have Africa; America is a white country.  I'm not racist; blacks have Africa.  I'm just looking out for my people", then not only will the MAGA base (including Wylted) not consider it a deal breaker, they would change their minds and agree with Trump on it.

That lets you know who really has the higher IQ (me or Wylted).  My policies I think through, his policies Trump thinks through.

Wylted won't deny my bullet point because he knows it's undeniably correct and the same is true with virtually every person that supports Trump to this day.

If any of the viewers of this comment talk politics on their own, then state my bullet point, modify it as you see fit, and expose people for who they really are.

If they say, "If Trump said that, then I would criticize him", then ask if it's a deal breaker.  If they say no, then you still expose them.  If they say yes, then gradually whittle down the level of seriousness that they consider to be a deal breaker (you could add, "If Trump came out as supporting killing unborn babies"), then they're broken down to the point where they would say yes.  Then you show Trump defending free IVF and state how IVF kills zygotes (which they argue are unborn babies).  

I don't see how a MAGA person who doesn't tolerate a POTUS they believe is racist can respond to that.  It's a knockout punch, and I think this image is appropriate.

America vs Russia.  We know who MAGA sides with; who do you side with?  I side with the country they call woke.  Well, you know what they say: 

#19
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,953
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@RemyBrown
Anyone that identifies as a 19th century bourgeois hypocrite.

Is probably a 21st century bourgeois wannabee.

Isn't everyone?
#20
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@RemyBrown
You are simply an idiot who is making assumptions and you have not even asked me why I support Trump, or asked anyone else. 

The main reason is because the enemy of my enemy is Mt friend and a bunch of corrupt power brokers hate him. He also better moves the direction of the company in the direction I want. His views are closer to Paleo conservatism than Kamala Harris. I am not a single issue voter so obviously you proving something to me like the ignorant non issues you point to wouldn't make me shift the other direction. 

To change my mind on Trump you would have tondo one of the following.

1. Prove Kamala Harris is more of a paleo conservative than Trump

2. Prove that both would move the country the same direction towards or away from the paleo conservative vision for the country. 

So know you claiming that literally murdering a baby is equal to IVF treatment isn't going to move me, neither is some retarded argument that aborting a baby is equivalent to stem cell research going to move me. 

Obviously IVF creates more babies while abortion kills more babies. It's not a strong issue for me but more people existing is generally better than less people existing
#21
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 347
Posts: 10,131
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@WyIted
more people existing is generally better than less people existing
Yes. Its better if more people suffer.
#22
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Best.Korea
Yes. Its better if more people suffer.
This thread is not about schopenhaur 

Remy's moral framework that he proposed is one that values life and he makes the mistake of assuming all life is equal, such as the zygote and a fully formed baby. He mistakenly thinks that those who oppose abortion agree the zygote is as important as a fully formed human, when this is not the argument at all.

I understand your belief that existence is suffering but I am addressing his premises not your. I wouldn't necessarily disagree with you, but the question in your case is whether the suffering is worth it? We would then have to calculate the value of suffering and existing and compare it to an obviously painless non existence. 
#23
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FLRW
China hunger statistics for 2022 was 0.00%, a 2.5% decline from 2021. China will buy the USA after Trump makes it his biggest bankruptcy. I hope they will make me a Province manager when they take over.
China's statistics are not trustworthy and the statistics on starvation in the United States are about 0.0% . Food insecurity is not a useful statistics because of how prevalent food banks are and other resources like soup kitchens. 

As far as buying up the United States. It is currently occurring.  The Chinese are buying up most of the new farmland that goes on the market. I did see Trump say that he would put restrictions on non Americans buying land. 

This isn't referring to achieve people who have moved to the united states either. This is about Chinese people living in aching buying up land
#24
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 347
Posts: 10,131
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@WyIted
but the question in your case is whether the suffering is worth it?
I doubt it, given that everything I accomplish in life will disappear for me once I die, and everything I accomplished so far is hardly worthy of the suffering I endured.

Of course, Gods might decide to create me again, but with empty memory, starting everything all over again, which I cant really say is good or wanted by me.

Now, there is the "unknown future" problem, where people are supposed to want to live because great things might happen in the future. Heh
Topic's author
#25
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
-->
@WyIted
To change my mind on Trump you would have tondo one of the following.

1. Prove Kamala Harris is more of a paleo conservative than Trump

2. Prove that both would move the country the same direction towards or away from the paleo conservative vision for the country. 

Or I could argue Paleo conservatism is bad and should not be adopted as a belief.

Paleo conservatism:
Paleoconservatives support restrictions on immigration, decentralization, trade tariffs and protectionism, economic nationalism, isolationism, and a return to traditional conservative ideals relating to gender, race, sexuality, culture, and society.[20]
Paleoconservatism differs from neoconservatism in opposing free trade and promoting republicanism. Paleoconservatives see neoconservatives as imperialists and themselves as defenders of the republic.[21][22]
Paleoconservatives tend to oppose abortion, gay marriage, and LGBTQ rights.[20][23]

  1. Immigration: The US should have open borders because more people -> more GDP and that's how we stay ahead of China.  It also is good for family values, because seperating parents from kids -> less single motherhood.  They say, "The law" (that should change) but then advocate changing the law in the wrong direction (ending birthright citizenship).  They do not consistently support the law, only sadistic policies to immigrants (that if they were white, then they could be undocumented and you wouldn't care (like Trump's wife for a while)).  
  2. Decentralization: In what way?
  3. Trade tariffs: Free trade is the best for America and job growth.
  4.  Nationalism: In what way?
  5. Isolationism: In what way?
  6. Right wing RSG views: Irrelevent; black people cheer for blacks, white people cheer for whites.  Women and men tend to cheer for their own respective gender.  I don't care about someone's RSG views as they tend to reflect characteristics they were born with.
  7. Anti-abortion: Abortion should be legal and you agree with this.  Paleo cons want to ban abortion from conception (which you don't agree with)
  8. Homophobia: Homophobia is bad.
Paleoconservatism is a bad ideology and you should agree with that.  If you don't, then defend Paleo conservatism.

So know you claiming that literally murdering a baby is equal to IVF treatment isn't going to move me, neither is some retarded argument that aborting a baby is equivalent to stem cell research going to move me. 
Paleo cons want to ban abortion from conception (so they think a zygote is a human being).
Topic's author
#26
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
-->
@WyIted
Food insecurity is not a useful statistics because of how prevalent food banks are and other resources like soup kitchens. 
So because of welfare (that the conservatives want to cut, leading to more children starving unless they can send enough charity work to equal the loss of welfare funding (which if they could, then they would have already done it).  Since they haven't, it means that private charity won't be enough to feed starving children and the government must force people to pay more in taxes to save the poor children.

Cutting welfare -> more children's deaths because assuming charity will fill the void is wishful thinking.

Are you liking your own comments again?  Are you that desperate for approval?
#27
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@RemyBrown
Cutting welfare -> more children's deaths because assuming charity will fill the void is wishful thinking.
Once again look at the starvation levels in countries that try to have the most economic interventiomism like north Korea, Venezuela and China.

America becoming like those cou tries would result in more children starving



So the real choices are

1. A bunch of welfare to feel like you are doing g something

2. Or actually prevent starvation by being high in the economic freedom index. 

So do you want to murder children like an evil piece of shit or are you just retarded and don't see that taking cou tries lower in the economic freedom index is bad and will have the same results it has always had for the last few hundred years
Topic's author
#28
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
-->
@WyIted
Once again look at the starvation levels in countries that try to have the most economic interventiomism like north Korea, Venezuela and China.

America becoming like those cou tries would result in more children starving
Why not Scadinavia (which people want to copy and not North Korea, China, etc)?

You would say:

These places have more economic freedom than the US.

To which I say:

Ok; so then get Universal healthcare and massive welfare like Scadinavia to increase our economic freedom

And you never rebut that.

So do you want to murder children like an evil piece of shit or are you just retarded and don't see that taking cou tries lower in the economic freedom index is bad and will have the same results it has always had for the last few hundred years
Neither; you are the retarted one for not continuing the script.

The script:

Me: Lets have more free stuff!

You: That's socialism!

Me: Scandinavia has more free stuff and they are more successful!

You: These places have more economic freedom than the US.

Me: Ok; so then get Universal healthcare and massive welfare just like Scandinavia to increase our economic freedom.

You: ABC

Please state what ABC is or accept UHC to turn us more into Scandinavia to increase our economic freedom.

And if you like your own comments, then publicly own it so people know the obvious claim that you agree with everything you write the moment you write it.


#29
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 4,844
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@RemyBrown
The economic freedom index would have those things lower the economic freedom of the United States, you would have to simultaneously do that while also eliminating taxes or something to make up for it. I would say though that the scandinavian countries could have an even higher standard of living by dropping the policies you reccomend.

Please read the following article to know why what you suggest is evil. https://fee.org/articles/if-american-healthcare-kills-european-healthcare-kills-more/

Also please when you find out you are wrong than stop being a retard and just change your opinion. I get it. I was a liberal like you once also, the difference is when I was disproven I stopped advocating for evil and started advocating for good
Topic's author
#30
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 101
0
2
3
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
0
2
3
-->
@WyIted
The economic freedom index would have those things lower the economic freedom of the United States, you would have to simultaneously do that while also eliminating taxes or something to make up for it.
Why?  Scandinavia has really high taxes and they have a higher amount of economic freedom?

I would say though that the scandinavian countries could have an even higher standard of living by dropping the policies you recommend.
But then their economic freedom would drop to be more like ours.

What right wing fiscal policies does Scadinavia have where the US has a left wing counterpart policy?

Please read the following article to know why what you suggest is evil.

They cite Fraser institute.


Now, what I would do is common sense: Cite life expectancy of the countries with UHC vs the ones without it (assuming they are all 1st world).  Let me know what you get.

Life expectancy won't be a biased measure I think.