"Trust the Fired: The Unfiltered Truth from Trump’s Ex-Employees!"

Author: Greyparrot

Posts

Total: 39
#31
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
You already said many times you hate Biden
I never said I hate Biden, don't know where you got that from. I have said I'm not a Biden fan, which I never was. I didn't vote in the primaries because by the time they got to NY it was pretty much decided, but I was happy he won because he consistently polled better against Trump than anyone else, which is all I really cared about.

I have come around more to him over recent years though as he's accomplished far more than could have ever been expected given these polarizing times. He has consistently shown that he's better at the job than most president's we've seen in our lifetimes, assuming of course that we're judging president's by accomplishments rather than TV performances.

he is however the only president who has had the majority of his own employees tell us he is unfit to serve.
That typically happens when the opposition party invests millions paying them off with book deals and MSM shows.
No, it doesn't. Again, we've never seen that before.

And also, you're just a flat out liar. You have zero evidence the Democratic party paid any of these people anything, and their book deals only happened because their claims have credibility given the absurd behavior of the person they're talking about.

Moreover, you think former Biden officials couldn't have gotten booked every night on Fox news, OANN and News Max and sold books claiming Joe Biden is being controlled by some puppet master conglomerate lead by Hunter Biden and Barrack "Hussein" Obama? Of course they could have, yet no one has. Gee, I wonder why.
#32
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Double_R
Gee, I wonder why.
It’s a commie plot by the msm and the oligarchs?

#33
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
He sure sounded pretty angry during his farewell speech at the DNC....
You are delusional…

Topic's author
#34
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,992
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
RFK is about to join Maga.
#35
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,243
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
The only reason it would possibly be overpriced is that the government is stealing money to pay for it (oh wait that's exactly what is happening) while simultaneously making it impossible for for competition to emerge (oh wait that's exactly what is happening).

Like who knows what you're even saying here tbh. The reason it's overpriced is because you lot have no universal healthcare and dying desperate people are left to negotiate on their own behalf with predatory suppliers. Everywhere else in the world its cheap and plentiful because our governments negotiate on our behalf. The lions aren't let to pick off the weakest of the herd. 

GP hammers out another reel of meaningless bullshit about nothing at all, thinks he's some sort of internet superhero. Surely has diabetes too right. Last pic I saw of you GP you were a lardass and then some.

Literally zero problem with capping insulin prices. Doesn't have any negative consequences at all.
#36
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,171
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@badger
Everywhere else in the world its cheap and plentiful because our governments negotiate on our behalf.
Just because you don't see the cost, doesn't mean it was cheap. If it's cheaper elsewhere that governments negotiate that is only because of less corruption.

So long as it is a government-monopoly negotiation it will inevitably become a government-monopoly collusion. The solution is rational self-interest, that removes the practicality of corruption and motivates efficiency.


The lions aren't let to pick off the weakest of the herd.
The herd could take care of itself if were allowed, as it is for food (and even there attacks are being made). When the government makes it impossible to farm without bribing the government, then government will be "negotiating" the price of food whether that is the official narrative or not.

The US federal government IS negotiating the price of insulin by regulating who can produce it and what hoops and rain dance they need to go through, that's why it's so expensive; the government bureaucracy only allows organizations that bribe them to produce. Note that bribery vs being agent is just a matter of perspective, if the pharma oligopoly has candidates in their pocket, candidates who will miraculously do very well in the stock market, before they are even 'elected' that is not morally or practically different from bribery.
#37
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,243
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Just because you don't see the cost, doesn't mean it was cheap.
It was cheap. We pay a tenth of the price for insulin that you do. We spend half of what you do on healthcare in general whilst having better outcomes. We're buying our drugs from the same companies that you are. 

It's pretty obvious what's happening here. People in need of insulin are desperate and will pay. The drug companies and your insurance providers are taking advantage. Spoils your libertarian dream. 
#38
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,171
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@badger

Just because you don't see the cost, doesn't mean it was cheap.
It was cheap. We pay a tenth of the price for insulin that you do. We spend half of what you do on healthcare in general whilst having better outcomes. We're buying our drugs from the same companies that you are. 
So why can't our benevolent government get those prices and resell the insulin directly to the people? Why do they need to threaten the companies if they sell above this 1/10th price?


It's pretty obvious what's happening here. People in need of insulin are desperate and will pay.
People in need of food are desperate and will pay, but the food production chain is hyper competitive with small profit margins all around. Why?


Spoils your libertarian dream.
Your misunderstanding is representative of what is spoiling the libertarian dream, that is true.

#39
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,243
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
So why can't our benevolent government get those prices and resell the insulin directly to the people? Why do they need to threaten the companies if they sell above this 1/10th price?
That sounds like socialised healthcare to me. Good idea.

People in need of food are desperate and will pay, but the food production chain is hyper competitive with small profit margins all around. Why?
Comparing precision engineered medicine to food which literally grows on trees for the most part is silly. They're not so desperate and they in this instance are not a small subsection of the population that the rest of us have left to the sharks. If your whole country had diabetes and it looks like its trending that way, then you'd have cheap insulin. The drug companies and your insurance companies are preying on vulnerable people.