Before Biden dropped out, I looked at the lies he listed and it was things like "I have the biggest crowds". It's stupid immature criticisms of obvious hyperbole.
I don't know why you would limit your review to things Biden pointed out, you can find any fact checker who will list dozens if not hundreds of far more dangerous and consequential lies he's told, but it's odd that you would even need to do that. Trump's relationship with the truth is unlike anything we have ever seen in American politics, the man simply isn't concerned with whether anything he says matches to reality and that is demonstrated by literally every extemporaneous thought he utters. There is no way you can listen to him speak without seeing that.
As far at the crowd size lie among many others like it, the reason these lies are focused on so heavily is because aside from the obvious pettiness, childishness, and how small and insecure it shows him to be, which calls into question whether he is fit on the most basic level to be the commander in chief, these lies are very simple for people to understand. Knowing how freely he will lie about something so easily disprovable is the first step to understanding how much he lies about everything. If you are going to make excuses for something that should be so easily disqualifying then any further conversation is kind of pointless, at that point you're clearly not interested in seeing him for what he is.
We all know the media is evil.
No, we don't. Some organizations are what I would consider evil, and the marker for me is whether they are in business to report the news or whether they are in business to tell people what they want to hear. Fox News founding document outlining it's entire reason for existence was titled "a plan to put the GOP on television". That tells you all you need to know.
For example instead of covering press briefings as fact, I would probably just live stream the press briefing with zero commentary so people can make up their own mind and I don't accidentally insert any bias or lies
A nice idea in theory, until you have segments of our society actively spreading disinformation. It's irresponsible for any news organization to allow it without warning people about the lies being told.
This is the defining problem of our time in the media world. In a perfect world neutral journalism and objective journalism are basically the same thing. Not anymore. Today we have one political party lead by a man who is entirely unconstrained by reality, so actual news organizations are forced to choose between the two. To be neutral is to allow blatant misinformation to spread, to be objective is to effectively pick a side and be labeled bias. Heads I win tails you loose. That's what happens when you have a president who calls the press the enemy of the people. There is a reason the left freaked out about that in 2016, a society that has lost it's ability to tell reality from fiction is destined to fail.