I'm just saying that different people have different values and thus, different moral standards which makes them inherently subjective.
But who’s to say those values are moral? What if they’re immoral values?
It is the choices and actions one makes based on those values that are moral or immoral.
But moral standards isn’t just a descriptive, it’s a prescriptive in the sense that everybody should follow it in order to accomplish their goals. Question is what’s a goal that we all have in common? That’s the pursuit of happiness.
The actions one takes in that pursuit can be determined to be moral or immoral.
Yes through heaven or hell, the moral actions are rewarded in heaven and the immoral actions are punished in hell.
But then, one mans morality is another's immorality...Such is subjective data processing.
That pretty much sums it up.
Values are subjective.
Do you consider values and morals to be the same thing?
No, I don't. In a nutshell, values relate to our wants and needs; morals relate to the means (choices, actions), by which, we attain them.
something’s are either right or wrong regardless of what one thinks.
Is all morality objective or just some things?
To say that morality is both objective and complicated sounds contradictory. Or do you mean that even though a given moral action to be taken is objective, it can be very difficult to discern?
Regardless of whether they think morality is objective or subjective, I think most people have a difficult time in some situations deciding which course of action is the morally correct one to pursue.
I mean, like, who needs logical, common sense critical thinking when the flipping a coin is so much easier?
“Anyone who is not treated with the same deference as everyone else is by definition being treated unfairly.”
“Anyone who is not treated with the same deference as everyone else is by definition being treated unfairly.”
Then I assume you’re pro-life? Because the unborn aren’t treated with the same deference as everyone else who is born.
would you say that literally everyone is treated unfairly as no two people are treated with the exact same deference?
Two additional questions - would you say that literally everyone is treated unfairly as no two people are treated with the exact same deference? They may be treated similarly, but not the same. People treat people differently when considering who is morally deserving of what, which includes rewards and punishments. Or do those things accurately balance the scales when deference is not equal?
If I was unable to live without access to your body and you refused to grant me that access, I would die.
What's not the case?
