-->
@Casey_Risk
You’re still wrong.
I already looked things up and verified what the anonymous person wrote. They are not wrong, you are.
You can’t take a present day layman definition of jurisdiction out of Webster’s and apply it in a legal context back to when the 14th was debated and formally passed.
You clearly have no conceptual idea of what legislative history research is and why the courts use it to understand what the writers of the law/statutory framework was as originally intended.
When we travel we are beholden to follow another country’s laws not because we are under their (political) jurisdiction, but guests of their sovereign nation that has every legal right to enforce their laws upon any visitor the same they would any illegal alien or their own citizens.
None of any of you contesting the content of the OP have proven said content wrong. I understand what was written because I took the responsibility of verifying it myself to see that under the framework in which the 14th was drafted, taking language from the Civil Rights Act referenced, in relationship to the 13th, and how/why the language was debated as it was before ratification whereas none of you do.
So if you want to come at me, best take the same responsibility I did and verify it for yourself before opening your big fat mouths of ignorance throwing up the same ignorance and corruption the left uses to pervert birthright citizenship upon those who have no right to it.
Good night. It’s 🛌 time where I’m at.
PS. I won’t engage anyone who doesn’t do or reflect that they have done a respectable amount of research as I have on the subject. Not going to entertain uneducated mouthy people who can’t act like an adult and speak to me like one with actual intelligence in the subject matter.
