My grocery bill is burning in 2024MakeAffordableGroceriesAgain
Not everybody has liberty and freedom as end goals in the first place.
so I think decisions likes this are medical decisions best left up to the individual, their family (if we're talking about a minor) and their doctor.
what specific policies have democrats implemented to increase "liberty and freedom" ?
I don't need evidence.One person at least pretends to care about the problem and the other pretends it is not a problem or at least not HIS problem.
what specific policies have democrats implemented to increase "liberty and freedom" ?What specific fucks do you think I give about democrats based on what I said?
The liberal brain subconsciously assumes that most others have the same goals of liberty, freedom etc. that the liberal has
That post was about liberalism not some political organization that I didn't even mention in it.
I do not support political violence
Thats great, because violence wont pay off the debt or make Americans less retarded.
pray that Jesus fixes USA
Trump is proposing tariffs on more than $3 trillion of imports, a 10-fold increase over what he did in his first term. The tariffs could make it more expensive to bring in the raw materials that U.S. factories need while also raising prices for consumers already struggling with high inflation.
He had to send them billions...
you're just mad he didn't send that money to the global oligarchs.
This country is so divided and full of anger that we are going to explode soon. I recommend we all pick a side that would win in a civil war. One side will gain power and try to push the other side out.Jan 6 was a near pre-curser to that. If they had not tried to play by the rules like good Americans, then we may have a better country now. They should have just destroyed everything like BLM and it would have been a good thing, but unfortunately conservatives believe in life and the value of God, country and family. I could only think of a handful of politicians that would be worth saving, on either side. Wipe them out and start over again.Screw all you liberals for drinking the media kool-aide and driving our country to go to pot. Screw the corrupt politicians for not holding up a moral standard and making our debt how it is.I hope Trump gets into office and breaks everything.
...but telling them to go home is supposed to work?It literally did. Many of the rioters started clearing out as soon as he sent that video.
You keep arguing that sending any kind of communication to them was futile because they wouldn't have listened, but when I make the point that he did nothing for 3 hours your immediate response was to jump to his Twitter post to say he did. So which side of the fence is it?
which cuts entirely against the argument that he never expected violenceYou always expect a few crazies.You don't send in 10,000 troops to deal with a few crazies.
Again, if Trump was offering these troops it's only because he recognized a very real threat of violence on a massive scale.
You can't have it both ways.
But this debate isn't about how effectively Trump could have stopped the attack, it's about what his purposeful inaction says about him and how that is not an unquestionable disqualification for office.
You can't have it both ways.Yes I can (again).
You don't send in 10,000 troops to deal with a few crazies.That's what Pelosi thought.
In fact the reason Pelosi and goons refused is because they thought he would execute a military coup with the troops he sent to help
He wasn't idle for three hours
This is what happens when we elect a pathological liar and a complete moron to be our president.
So my question to anyone who supports this guy is; what do you make of those 187 minutes? How do you explain it and why would you even consider voting for him after it?
This is the most incoherent rant I've seen on this site in quite a while.
What's your point?
do you think jan6 was a bigger deal than oct7 ?
do you think jan6 was a bigger deal than oct7 ?In some ways yes, in some ways no.Oct 7 was a far more tragic day. Jan 6th was far worse when it came to the historical significance of what we just witnessed and what it meant for the future of the nation.To put it differently, Oct 7th was an attack on people from the outside, Jan 6th was an attack from the inside on our very way of life and it was lead by the person we entrusted to protect it.Still don't know what your post has to do with anything.
You can't have it both ways.Yes I can (again).Yeah, that pretty much sums up our entire conversation. When I accuse Trump of inciting and then allowing the attack on the Capitol your answer is essentially "no he didn't, but it's good that he did".
you guys want Trump to be the guy he was on January 6th
while pretending he was never that guy because you know the overwhelming majority of the country doesn't want it.
You don't send in 10,000 troops to deal with a few crazies.That's what Pelosi thought.You do know that Nancy Pelosi was not in charge of Capitol security and had no authority to refuse national guard assistance right?
This is what happens when we elect a pathological liar and a complete moron to be our president. He just says things and then for half the country it becomes the truth no matter how easily disprovable.
In fact the reason Pelosi and goons refused is because they thought he would execute a military coup with the troops he sent to helpCompletely and totally made up.
He wasn't idle for three hoursDo you have any evidence to back that up?
