Dissenting supreme court judge urges Biden to assassinate trump

Author: WyIted
Trump
Biden
Assassination

Posts

Total: 188
Topic's author
#1
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Sotomayor after dissenting from the recent Supreme Court decision gave a wink and a not to Biden claiming he now had the authority to assassinate Trump. 


America has now went from democrats jailing their political opponents to advocating for their assassination. Some former member of seal team 6 on Twitter have openly stated they are ready to carry out the orders if Biden gives them the call.

Also the first person who comments after this post is gay
#2
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Yes! That’s what I say. Its perfectly legal and appropriate according the the conservatives on the Supreme Court.
Topic's author
#3
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
This just in, some democrats have said limited immunity means full immunity and have misinterpreted an easy to answer supreme court decision. 
#4
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,806
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@WyIted
Good one!
Topic's author
#5
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Quote from article

Sonia Sotomayor, an associate justice who dissented from the court’s opinion, claimed the ruling would give presidents the power to assassinate political enemies.

Wink wink Mr. President (:

“Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organises a military coup to hold onto power? Immune,” she said
Wink Wink this is hypothetical please do not do it Biden Wink Wink

But if you do it, we will make sure you stay out of jail Wink wink
Topic's author
#6
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Quoting democratic party spokesman Robert Deniro

BIDEN can legally send in seal team 6 to kill Trump and they definitely should
Another quote from a few weeks ago

Trump will have his political opponents imprisoned and executed. He is a fascist and we must preserve democracy
There are calls across the nation following the ruling begging Biden to save democracy by murdering Trump and canceling the upcoming election
#7
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
This just in, some democrats have said limited immunity means full immunity and have misinterpreted an easy to answer supreme court decision. 
Bullshit. The President has Full Immunity for official acts. His immunity is limited in that private conduct is not immune from prosecution.
An order to Seal Team 6 as Commander in Chief is definitely an official act.

#8
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@WyIted
There are calls across the nation following the ruling begging Biden to save democracy by murdering Trump and canceling the upcoming election
Well, the MAGA MORONS voted for chaos, and chaos is what they deserve.

Topic's author
#9
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Oh shit this means the president is defects the commander in chief and can give the military orders. This is unprecedented 

Topic's author
#10
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well, the MAGA MORONS voted for chaos, and chaos is what they deserve.
Maga means make America great. Not sure why that is moronic. However you may be happy with the status quo and think there is zero room for improvement but a lot of people disagree and want to mix things up a bit
#11
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@WyIted
Maga means make America great.
Actually it is a euphemism for Make America White Again.
And moron just means these people are unmoved by facts

#12
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@WyIted
However you may be happy with the status quo and think there is zero room for improvement but a lot of people disagree and want to mix things up a bit
Yes, just like the German people in 1930

#13
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
They dissented which means they don't agree with the decision. Low quality bait, you can do better.
Topic's author
#14
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yes, just like the German people in 1930
Also Martin Luther king Junior, ghandi,  Jesus and Greta thunberg,  

Actually it is a euphemism for Make America White Again.
Not really. Here is how you know this

1. Economic policies which makes things better for African americans

2. Anti illegal immigration because it increases black and Hispanic unemployment and drives down wages

3. Made it easier to outlaw abortion. 50% of blacks are aborted before they are even born so this is the first step at ending the silent black genocide

4. Opposes increasing the minimum wage to $20 an hour. Studies show that African Americans are more likely to suffer from job loss after a minimum wage increase than whites.

5. Pro police. The refund police movement wants to remove police from black communities so they suffer more from being the victims of crime. 

Do you ever get tired of being the type of person who just goes along with literally everything your party says?

While nearly every other member of the site can think for themselves and can weigh the pros and cons of each side and determine their political affiliation through that as opposed to blindly going

Orange man bad because CNN told me. 

Also every major corporation on the planet say orange man bad only rural whites like orange man and rural whites are evil for you know being white and farming and stuff so orange man bad. 
Topic's author
#15
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
They dissented which means they don't agree with the decision. Low quality bait, you can do better
The dissenter is claiming the law can be used for biden to assassinate Trump. Do you think the majority believe that is how their decision should be interpreted? 
#16
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
It's not a law it's a court decision made by your side's judges.

To answer your question though it seems like an accurate interpretation from what I have seen and I agree with the dissenting judges that it is a bad thing.

You are implying that it is an inaccurate interpretation but you are not outright saying that it is.
Topic's author
#17
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
You know what's funny about Sotomayor decision. It is the judges duty to  determine the intention of the original framers of the constitution. 

Sotomayor in her decision doesn't do that. I stead she thinks about whether he decision would be good or bad for the country according to her own moral framework. That my friend is evil.

However if she wasn't trying to encourage a hit, why wouldn't she make her opinion claim that the ruling doesn't align with the framers intent and not explicitly explain how the law could be interpreted by disingenuous people to assassinate political rivals?
#18
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@WyIted
Also Martin Luther king Junior, ghandi,  Jesus and Greta thunberg,  
Hmmm, tell me what laws those people were accused of breaking?  vagrancy? Loitering?, protesting without a permit?
Trump was colluding with government officials to nullify an election. An election that was as free and fair as any other election in our history.

#19
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@WyIted
Economic policies which makes things better for African americans
Bullshit. Name 2 policies that made things better for blacks.
Anti illegal immigration because it increases black and Hispanic unemployment and drives down wages
More bullshit. Trump is anti legal immigration too because his supporters are racist.

Made it easier to outlaw abortion. 50% of blacks are aborted before they are even born so this is the first step at ending the silent black genocide
Unbelievable. You can’t be serious. What idiot gave you this ridiculous factnoid 

Opposes increasing the minimum wage to $20 an hour. Studies show that African Americans are more likely to suffer from job loss after a minimum wage increase than whites.
Terrible, so for blacks, a pay increase is actually bad for them. Funny how pay increases for white people is totally appropriate. Studies? What studies? From the Association of bigots and morons?  The ABM?

The refund police movement wants to remove police from black communities so they suffer more from being the victims of crime.
False, they want police to stop killing blacks for no good reason.

Do you ever get tired of being the type of person who just goes along with literally everything your party says?
You’re going along with the morons you see online and YouTube 

Orange man bad because CNN told me.
Isn’t it more like -  Orange man bad because he’s a draft dodging, tax cheating, pathological liar who rapes women and was convicted of fraud. He’s a racist conman who told a big lie to try and stay in power.
Topic's author
#20
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Trump was colluding with government officials to nullify an election. An election that was as free and fair as any other election in our history.
The evidence for this is a call with the Georgia official and he was recorded saying to find all the votes so that everyone's vote is counted.


More bullshit. Trump is anti legal immigration too because his supporters are racist.
Nope, nearly every speech where he says he wants to close the border he also mentions increasing legal immigration. 

Terrible, so for blacks, a pay increase is actually bad for them. Funny how pay increases for white people is totally appropriate. Studies? What studies? From the Association of bigots and morons? The ABM?


False, they want police to stop killing blacks for no good reason.
Not really true, and proven in case after case where there is false claims of this are exposed for what they are. 

It's actually fucking evil and odd what the left does too. There are always a few unjustified shootings by police every year, always at least a few with black people as victims, but the media only focuses on one's that a demonsrtatively false. 

Plus if they really cared they would increase funding for better training and to recruit higher quality candidates but instead they promote defending the police. And giving their funding to social service workers or something.

You’re going along with the morons you see online and YouTube 

Not true, my platform actually deviates from those sources while yours are perfectly in line with CNN. Sure there is overlap but I don't blindly just accept a policy because Tim pool said it was real like you do with CNN.

Isn’t it more like - Orange man bad because he’s a draft dodging, tax cheating, pathological liar who rapes women and was convicted of fraud. He’s a racist conman who told a big lie to try and stay in power.
Yep there is the programming. Even the phrase "big lie" which Hitler used to describe Jewish tactics. I guess Maga and Trump are the new jews so these false convictions are fine as are laws banning free speech etc.
#21
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
Maybe this is my fault for only implying that I wanted you to stop being a coward rather than outright saying it, so I'll outright say it now:

Stop being a coward and outright state whether you think the claim of the dissenting judges and Trump's lawyer that this essentially allows for political assassinations is accurate or inaccurate.
Topic's author
#22
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
he claim of the dissenting judges that this essentially allows for political assassinations is accurate or inaccurate.
inaccurate

Stephen Wermiel, a law professor specialising in the supreme court, said the notion was “preposterous”,
#23
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
You don't think that a political assassination could be argued to be part of a president’s role as commander in chief under this new decision?
Topic's author
#24
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
You don't think that a political assassination could be argued to be part of a president’s role as commander in chief?
Not a domestic one. I didn't have a problem with the assassinating the Iranian president. I also don't think Trump should be able to lock up Biden for killing a foreign leader. We need to make sure presidents are safe to perform their duties without worrying about reprisals and we should be extremely lenient with presidents regarding this even if CNN and Fox both hate the particular president
#25
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
You don't think that a political assassination could be argued to be part of a president’s role as commander in chief?
Not a domestic one.

Stephen Wermiel, a law professor specialising in the supreme court, said that such an action could be.

#26
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,846
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yes! That’s what I say. Its perfectly legal and appropriate according the the conservatives on the Supreme Court.
It's also perfectly legal for Biden to dispatch Seal Team 6 to kill all of the conservative Supreme Courts Justices and replace them with young loyalists for life.

Then kill all of his opposition, Trump twice.

There are no longer three coequal branches of government, the Executive Branch has the military, as Commander and in Chief Biden could deploy the military against Congress. 

All legal, and all justified if the President feels he is serving in his official capacity.
Topic's author
#27
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Sidewalker
a
l legal, and all justified if the President feels he is serving in his official capacity.
I think his feelings would be inconsequential to how a court would rule

#28
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,846
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yes! That’s what I say. Its perfectly legal and appropriate according the the conservatives on the Supreme Court.
It's also perfectly legal for Biden to dispatch Seal Team 6 to kill all of the conservative Supreme Courts Justices and replace them with young loyalists for life.

Then kill all of his opposition, Trump twice.

There are no longer three coequal branches of government, the Executive Branch has the military, as Commander and in Chief Biden could deploy the military against Congress. 

All legal, and all justified if the President feels he is serving in his official capacity.
#29
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,846
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@WyIted
l legal, and all justified if the President feels he is serving in his official capacity.
I think his feelings would be inconsequential to how a court would rule
The highest court already ruled, they authorized everything I said.
Topic's author
#30
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,902
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Sidewalker
The highest court already ruled, they authorized everything I said.
I think the ruling was it had to be an official duty not that it had to feel like an official duty