No but fact checkers are which is why you still have idiots who think he told people to inject bleach
Again, it’s a lazy excuse, this response only further proves that. There are always going to be fake claims made and people out here arguing to further them, that is irrelevant to the truth of the claim so the nuclear method of blowing up all fact checking which you are essentially doing here doesn’t work.
The fact is if it is already illegal than liberals would not give a shit about a bill that makes it illegal. That is a fact.
No, that’s the political game republicans are playing to get you to think democrats are baby killers. And this is why… because it works.
This kind of thinking is very much like when conspiracy theorists make wild claims and then place the burden on everyone else to prove them wrong. Legislation with no purpose and no real impact on anything should be rejected. It is your job as the sponsor of a bill to show why everyone else should vote for it, not to throw out a bill that accomplishes nothing and then act s if those who don’t vote for it must be against whatever your bill pretends to accomplish.
Some of the responses I heard was this puts doctors in trouble, which is nonsense if you also claim they just aren't doing it.
They aren’t doing the silly little thing you claim (executing babies, apparently for the fun of it), that doesn’t mean they can’t be held legally liable for it. That’s the problem with these laws. A doctor’s job is to make medical decisions. When you start legislating what they are or are not allowed to do, it is no longer just a medical decision, now it’s also a legal decision, which means they now need lawyers to get involved.
Most doctors are not going to risk their freedom over simply doing their job, so the end result is that when these services are necessary they just won’t bother. This is why even when it is technically legal to perform an abortion, the mother ends up bleeding out until she’s on her last breath before the doctors will intervene. This is what people are talking about when they say keep the government out of the doctors office.
The response is to claim that this is necessary to prevent the evils the law seeks to ban but that’s the problem; they’re just not happening. No one walks into a doctor’s office and says “I don’t feel like being pregnant anymore cause I want to go to the beach, so please kill this 9 month old baby”. So the evil situations you’re causing all of this havoc over aren’t real, but the pain and suffering resulting from it absolutely are.
Now it is clear that Trunp is a mustache twirling villain and literally insulted dead troops while surrounded by generals and military people.
What you want to take out of the conclusion that he said it is up to you, but you cannot claim he didn’t say it without defying all logic and reason.
You keep eluding to the idea that what he allegedly said is so outlandish it should be rejected out of hand while dismissing the fact that he says such outlandish things all the time. That’s like if Jeffery Dohmer was released from prison and was accused of eating someone and me coming along and saying “no way, no one would do that”.
