-->
@Moozer325
I'm not proving the seer part, consider it as an anecdote.
However, Biden having dementia is undeniable. Everyone saw it live, and the whole media recognized it. You're the only fool that can't see it.
Why is there such a big deal about Biden mumbling his words and not Trump lying through his teeth
Posts
Total:
116
-->
@IlDiavolo
People who say Trump is not a liar and Biden is not demented now are truly weird people.
-->
@IlDiavolo
However, Biden having dementia is undeniable. Everyone saw it live, and the whole media recognized it. You're the only fool that can't see it.
Some people just aren't good at public speaking. Biden is one of them. This has nothing to do with him being demented or not. If there is actual medical evidence that he's not at 100% I'll take a look at it, but so far all I see are anecdotal things that people are taking as proof.
-->
@IlDiavolo
Do you believe that lefty shit.
I do not believe anything, I'm an independent thinker.
-->
@IlDiavolo
Everyone saw it live, and the whole media recognized it
Is it possible the media is lying about Biden's apparent dementia?
-->
@Moozer325
Some people just aren't good at public speaking. Biden is one of them.
Look at his debates from 2020 where even then the mental decline was obvious, he was still 5000 times more coherent. He is a decent public speaker and life long politician with public speaking training
all I see are anecdotal things that people are taking as
This is retarded. We all could see a man shit himself and you would chalk it up to anecdotal evidence. You would he correct it is anecdotal but you would also be a retard for the mental gymnastics
-->
@Tidycraft
Is it possible the media is lying about Biden's apparent dementia?
It was a live debate, nobody was trying to fool the audience. So, me and most people around the world knew exactly how Biden's performance was.
-->
@WyIted
You can't believe biased fact checkers
Facts are not biased. This is a lazy excuse to look the other way rather than acknowledging the pathological liar you are defending.
this is one of those situations where there is a grey area in abortion laws and if a failed abortion is technically outside of the mother and technically still alive it is a newborn. This is a matter of semantics not a lie.
No, it’s a lie. Trump’s claim is that democrats support executing babies after birth. Reality doesn’t come close to that.
This claim comes from a bill that attempted to outlaw the killing of a fetus after birth, specifically tailored to a failed abortion. The bill didn’t propose outlawing anything that isn’t already illegal - if the fetus is out of the womb it’s already subject to the protection of the law like anyone else. The only thing the bill could have accomplished due to its apparent legislative intent (which judges absolutely do consider), are the efforts made to maintain the life of a non viable fetus.
Wherever you stand on that issue, that is worlds apart from “democrats are ok with infant execution”. And the use of the term “execution” is what takes this from a lie, to egregious propaganda. That’s intentional, which is exactly why Trump does this. It’s all about enraging you so that you don’t bother to question what he actually plans to do to make your life better, because for that he has nothing.
He lied about his "suckers and losers" quote, which he absolutely did say. He says he has 19 people who can say that he didn't say that, but has not backed that up in the slightest.He didn't say it. The quote originates from a general and came after the general was fired and just passed at his former boss. It's silly to think this guys stood in a military graveyard surrounded by generals and said this
Already explained to you in detail why this is nonsense.
-->
@Double_R
Facts are not biased. This is a lazy excuse to look the other way rather than acknowledging the pathological liar you are defending.
No but fact checkers are which is why you still have idiots who think he told people to inject bleach
This claim comes from a bill that attempted to outlaw the killing of a fetus after birth, specifically tailored to a failed abortion. The bill didn’t propose outlawing anything that isn’t already illegal - if the fetus is out of the womb it’s already subject to the protection of the law like anyone else. The only thing the bill could have accomplished due to its apparent legislative intent (which judges absolutely do consider), are the efforts made to maintain the life of a non viable fetus.
The fact is if it is already illegal than liberals would not give a shit about a bill that makes it illegal. That is a fact.
Some of the responses I heard was this puts doctors in trouble, which is nonsense if you also claim they just aren't doing it.
Already explained to you in detail why this is nonsense.
Thanks for clearing that up. Now it is clear that Trunp is a mustache twirling villain and literally insulted dead troops while surrounded by generals and military people.
-->
@WyIted
Thanks for clearing that up. Now it is clear that Trunp is a mustache twirling villain and literally insulted dead troops while surrounded by generals and military people.
Didn't Biden openly insult troops on camera in front of their corpses by checking the time? Why couldn't Trump do the same thing?
-->
@WyIted
No but fact checkers are which is why you still have idiots who think he told people to inject bleach
Again, it’s a lazy excuse, this response only further proves that. There are always going to be fake claims made and people out here arguing to further them, that is irrelevant to the truth of the claim so the nuclear method of blowing up all fact checking which you are essentially doing here doesn’t work.
The fact is if it is already illegal than liberals would not give a shit about a bill that makes it illegal. That is a fact.
No, that’s the political game republicans are playing to get you to think democrats are baby killers. And this is why… because it works.
This kind of thinking is very much like when conspiracy theorists make wild claims and then place the burden on everyone else to prove them wrong. Legislation with no purpose and no real impact on anything should be rejected. It is your job as the sponsor of a bill to show why everyone else should vote for it, not to throw out a bill that accomplishes nothing and then act s if those who don’t vote for it must be against whatever your bill pretends to accomplish.
Some of the responses I heard was this puts doctors in trouble, which is nonsense if you also claim they just aren't doing it.
They aren’t doing the silly little thing you claim (executing babies, apparently for the fun of it), that doesn’t mean they can’t be held legally liable for it. That’s the problem with these laws. A doctor’s job is to make medical decisions. When you start legislating what they are or are not allowed to do, it is no longer just a medical decision, now it’s also a legal decision, which means they now need lawyers to get involved.
Most doctors are not going to risk their freedom over simply doing their job, so the end result is that when these services are necessary they just won’t bother. This is why even when it is technically legal to perform an abortion, the mother ends up bleeding out until she’s on her last breath before the doctors will intervene. This is what people are talking about when they say keep the government out of the doctors office.
The response is to claim that this is necessary to prevent the evils the law seeks to ban but that’s the problem; they’re just not happening. No one walks into a doctor’s office and says “I don’t feel like being pregnant anymore cause I want to go to the beach, so please kill this 9 month old baby”. So the evil situations you’re causing all of this havoc over aren’t real, but the pain and suffering resulting from it absolutely are.
Now it is clear that Trunp is a mustache twirling villain and literally insulted dead troops while surrounded by generals and military people.
What you want to take out of the conclusion that he said it is up to you, but you cannot claim he didn’t say it without defying all logic and reason.
You keep eluding to the idea that what he allegedly said is so outlandish it should be rejected out of hand while dismissing the fact that he says such outlandish things all the time. That’s like if Jeffery Dohmer was released from prison and was accused of eating someone and me coming along and saying “no way, no one would do that”.
-->
@Double_R
They aren’t doing the silly little thing you claim (executing babies, apparently for the fun of it), that doesn’t mean they can’t be held legally liable for it.
How would they be held liable for an action they don't do?
You keep eluding to the idea that what he allegedly said is so outlandish it should be rejected out of hand while dismissing the fact that he says such outlandish things all the tim
Yeah like when he told everyone they should inject bleach?
-->
@Moozer325
Some people just aren't good at public speaking. Biden is one of them.
biden was a much better public speaker four years ago
"I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that."
This so-called "debate" website is so dead its beyond the crypt.
-->
@Amber
YES.
-->
@WyIted
They aren’t doing the silly little thing you claim (executing babies, apparently for the fun of it), that doesn’t mean they can’t be held legally liable for it.How would they be held liable for an action they don't do?
That’s the entire point. If there is a threat that they could be prosecuted for performing an abortion they won’t perform it. What they will do is instead wait until the situation is so dire that there is no way anyone can deny the need for it, meaning that they aren’t thinking in terms of what’s best for the patient, they’re thinking about what’s the best way to avoid someone charging them and then using stupid non-medical school educated arguments to convince an uneducated jury that they’re guilty.
Yeah like when he told everyone they should inject bleach?
No. That was stupidity, this allegation is supported by his clear narcissism.
He didn't tell everyone they should inject bleach, he mused openly about the possibly of people injecting disinfectants as a way to fight COVID. Many people out there exaggerated this into "he told people to inject bleach" which isn't accurate but is also not nearly as far from the truth as you have convinced yourself of. What any educated person understands is that there are always stupid people out there who trust public figures and will do what they interpreted their leaders as telling them to do. So when Trump did this it wasn't a surprise that there was a sudden uptick of people hospitalized with disinfectants in their system.
Any halfway intelligent would have known better than to throw out such ridiculous ideas at a press conference where the entire country is tuning in and scared. But Trump isn't halfway intelligent, the man is a downright moron.
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
"I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that."
sounds like the rantings of a lunatic
-->
@Double_R
Any halfway intelligent would have known better than to throw out such ridiculous ideas at a press conference where the entire country is tuning in and scared. But Trump isn't halfway intelligent, the man is a downright moron.
You would have to be retarded to think he was suggesting drinking bleach or whatever and I doubt actual retards were enthusiastically watching a press conference instead of Hannah Montana or whatever the fuck was popular in 2020
-->
@3RU7AL
sounds like the rantings of a lunatic
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
-->
@FLRW
Under Trump:
- The economy lost 2.9 million jobs. The unemployment rate increased by 1.6 percentage points to 6.3%.
- The international trade deficit Trump promised to reduce went up. The U.S. trade deficit in goods and services in 2020 was the highest since 2008 and increased 40.5% from 2016.
- The number of people lacking health insurance rose by 3 million.
- The federal debt held by the public went up, from $14.4 trillion to $21.6 trillion.
- Handgun production rose 12.5% in 2020 compared with 2016, setting a new record.
- The murder rate in 2020 rose to the highest level since 1997.
Yeah, MAGA thinks thats how winning looks like.
-->
@WyIted
Also I didn't really catch any Trump lies though I saw him ducking questions
Well that’s because you have no idea what the truth is
-->
@3RU7AL
sounds like the rantings of a lunatic
Doesn’t matter. Facts don’t matter to the MAGA MORONS
-->
@Tidycraft
Thank you.