So change the law. Or at least advocate for changing the law.
No because it violates the LUSHOOTY ethos because you are significantly harming the taxpayer to get universal healthcare.
Your still a man if you get a vasectomy, but a lesser one
Being a woman is a much higher honor than being a man.
and each individual humanhas natural sovereigntyover everything that happens inside their own bodyself-sovereign
so, ostensibly you believe abortion should be legal for women without healthcare
but you can’t rob someone else because of
I believe it’s plausible an uninsured pregnant woman has a less than 1% chance of dying without an abortion.
This is only true if they aren’t harming others to a significant extent.
robbing someone has nothing to do with smoking
Every day in 2020, almost 800 women died from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.
a blob of cells is not a human
Robbing someone because of your tobacco addiction is needed to satisfy your bodily autonomy to smoke if you can’t afford tobacco. This doesn’t mean theft for tobacco should be legalized.
Every day in 2020, almost 800 women died from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.This is a global statistic, not a U.S. statistic. In the US, I read somewhere that out of 4 million births, 800 of them result in death a year. This is .02% chance of death on average.
So a zygote is a human being.
who are you arguing with here ?nobody thinks bodily autonomy means you can rob force or coerce another citizen
do you think abortion should only be a crime in the united statesor do you think it should be a crime everywhere ?
After simple adjustments for varying methods, existing data show that at least 73% of natural single conceptions have no real chance of surviving 6 weeks of gestation.
Well those are accidents; and accidents should not be tried as the same action intentionally. This is why manslaughter is tried differently than murder. I think fetal unintentional homicide should be legal, but fetal intentional homicide should be punished with community service.
Well those are accidents; and accidents should not be tried as the same action intentionally. This is why manslaughter is tried differently than murder. I think fetal unintentional homicide should be legal, but fetal intentional homicide should be punished with community service.
No because it violates the LUSHOOTY ethos because you are significantly harming the taxpayer to get universal healthcare.
Homosexuality does harm the population as abortion.
you can't have a different standardfor zygotes
US women are being jailed for having miscarriages
does the catastrophic harm to the zygote outweigh the "harm" caused by a LESS THAN 1% increase in taxation ?
Homosexuality does harm the population as abortion.
If it was a genuine accident,
does the catastrophic harm to the zygote outweigh the "harm" caused by a LESS THAN 1% increase in taxation ?It would if the increase in taxation was 1% due to UHC. The reality is UHC would cost more than a 1% increase in taxation. My estimation is about 50% increase. But having the taxpayer take care of the kid if the woman can’t afford it would be akin to the taxpayer funding the tobacco costs of someone who chose to smoke.
the suggestion was universal healthcare for pregnancy only
but right now i'm paying just as much for insurance as i am paying for rent
so, it seems reasonable to me that if we implemented universal healthcare, my TOTAL EXPENDITURE would be at least flat if not DECREASE
To a significant extent. I take it that you already agree that it harms to a lesser extent.
Well to the non consenting which includes infants, children, young people, middle aged and even beyond over to those in the penitentiary prisons is pretty much a significant extent.
