Posts

Total: 96
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
#30

(7) biden reversed the trump travel ban

Yes he did.

He did not however address the underlying problem.

How did we benefit from the ban?

How did we benefit from  removal of the ban?

Do you understand how international travel is regulated.?

Do you understand that there are international standards used to clearly identify who is traveling?

Do you understand that seven countries did not  follow those standards ( although one later did while Trump was President, and the ban for that country was lifted .


"Travel restrictions are not based on the faith of the citizenry of a particular country but on assessments based on that country's information sharing or elevated risk levels" ( DHS cited above).


3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
(7) biden reversed the trump travel ban

this is the full extent of the claim
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
NO!

You said "(7) biden reversed the muslim travel ban"

I then proved that there was no such thing.

You then changed it to "the Trump travel ban", to which I asked several questions.

These were:

"(7) biden reversed the trump travel ban"

"Yes he did.

He did not however address the underlying problem.

How did we benefit from the ban?

How did we benefit from  removal of the ban?

Do you understand how international travel is regulated.?

Do you understand that there are international standards used to clearly identify who is traveling?

Do you understand that seven countries did not  follow those standards ( although one later did while Trump was President, and the ban for that country was
lifted .)?"

You need to address these issues.


3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
"(7) biden reversed the muslim travel ban"
everyone, including yourself understands that

"(7) biden reversed the muslim travel ban" = "(7) biden reversed the trump travel ban"

it's exactly the same thing
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
34

AGAIN

You said "(7) biden reversed the muslim travel ban"

I then proved that there was no such thing.

You then changed it to "the Trump travel ban", to which I asked several questions.

These were:

"(7) biden reversed the trump travel ban"

"Yes he did.

He did not however address the underlying problem.

How did we benefit from the ban?

How did we benefit from  removal of the ban?


Do you understand how international travel is regulated.?

Do you understand that there are international standards used to clearly identify who is traveling?

Do you understand that seven countries did not  follow those standards ( although one later did while Trump was President, and the ban for that country was
lifted .)?"

You need to address these issues.

ALSO

"(7) biden reversed the muslim travel ban" = "(7) biden reversed the trump travel ban          it's exactly the same thing

Not according to the US Government DHS as cited above.

Do you have an issue with reading comprehension?



3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
I then proved that there was no such thing.
you "proved" nothing of the sort
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
Oh god!!!!

#36

see #29.

Also the ban only impacted  0.02% of all Muslims ( 37 thousand out of 1.8 billion)
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
38

Hmmmm....

In the hierarchy of quality of information, which is higher: DHS or you tube?

Do you even know how to figure that out?

Here is help from WIKI...."YouTube and other video-sharing sites are generally not considered reliable sources ".

" Government documents and government websites are generally considered authoritative" ( https://apus.libanswers.com ).

Now go find a Klondike Bar wrapper that says the opposite.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
Don’t forget the bill to build microchip factories in America 
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
“I did like the airport hidden fees stuff”

Another MAGA MORON who wants everything for free.

Hey Government, build nice airports all over the country but I don’t want to pay for it!

I hate socialism, but I don’t want to pay for anything!






IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
It's kinda sad the gaslighting going on as Biden recently adopts every one of Trump's core immigration policies
So the reason the border is a mess is because Biden is using Trump’s policies. Got it.

3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
Here is help from WIKI...."YouTube and other video-sharing sites are generally not considered reliable sources ".
it's a 19 second long NEWS clip of trump saying he wants to ban all muslims
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
43

What was the date of the speech in the video .Was it after January 27, 2017? The date is extremely important as you might see very soon.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
What was the date of the speech in the video .Was it after January 27, 2017? The date is extremely important as you might see very soon.
please explain
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
45

On what date did Trump deliver the speech that YOU HAVE CITED?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
On what date did Trump deliver the speech that YOU HAVE CITED?

it doesn't matter

and

if you think it does matter

then

build a case
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
47

You made the citation, yet you fail to provide even rudimentary information about the item.

Go find a primary source. 

I did.

I know the date.

I find it laughable that you do not.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
I know the date.

ok

why

do

you

think

it

matters

?
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
49

Because your research skills are sub par.

You then assume things based on limited data.

Was that speech related to the Executive Order Travel Ban?

Did it occur after or before the EO?

You need a higher quality source than YT.

I know this information, and I am not  the one who gave the citation.

I find  your actions laughable and disingenuous.

3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
Because your research skills are sub par.

You then assume things based on limited data.

Was that speech related to the Executive Order Travel Ban?

Did it occur after or before the EO?

You need a higher quality source than YT.

I know this information, and I am not  the one who gave the citation.

I find  your actions laughable and disingenuous.

(IFF) trump said he wanted to ban all muslims BEFORE the policy (THEN) who the fu.ck cares ?

(IFF) trump said he wanted to ban all muslims AFTER the policy (THEN) who the fu.ck cares ?
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
51

(IFF) trump said he wanted to ban all muslims BEFORE the policy (THEN) who the fu.ck cares ?

I do. See if you can figure out why?

(IFF) trump said he wanted to ban all muslims AFTER the policy (THEN) who the fu.ck cares ?

I do. See if you can figure out why?

Maybe if you had better research skills, it would become self evident.

I find  your actions laughable and disingenuous.

3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
I do. See if you can figure out why?


just tell me what your opinion is based on


there is no internet search for "why the fu.ck does prefix care about this sh.it"




prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 542
3
4
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
4
9
-->
@3RU7AL
53

just tell me what your opinion is based on

It is not opinion...it is fact

See if you can tell the difference.

Maybe if you had better research skills, it would become self evident.

I find  your actions laughable and disingenuous.


3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
i remain unconvinced
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
I have to pretend Trump is better because Biden is objectively by every metric, the worst.
kamala is slightly better than Biden.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
There was never a Muslim ban. America banned Chinese and Japanese and Germans for a time though.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,652
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
You shouldnt misquote people. You already have a bad enough reputation.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
There was never a Muslim ban. America banned Chinese and Japanese and Germans for a time though.
everyone knows that trump tried to implement a muslim ban

everyone knows that for legal reasons they couldn't call it a muslim ban
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
This list reveals the concept’s evolution. After defending the outright Muslim ban for six months, Trump called Rudy Giuliani in early May 2016 [1] to, as Trump himself put it, “look at the Muslim ban.” Giuliani explained that Trump told him, “Show me the right way to do it legally.” This indicates that Trump wanted Giuliani to come up with a version of the Muslim ban that would satisfy legal concerns. (Note that at this point, there is no other proposal for the “it” to be, Trump confirmed that he used the phrase “Muslim ban,” and grammatically, the antecedent to “it” is “Muslim ban” in Giuliani’s comments.) With these marching orders, Giuliani and House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul—with help from former Attorney General Michael Mukasey and Rep. Peter King—then sent a memo to the Trump team that explained why the outright ban could be unconstitutional and urged the adoption of a territorial-based ban.