-->
@zedvictor4
I don't get into that. The scriptures are not a science book.
Did you know this about the holy scriptures?
Posts
Total:
114
-->
@Stephen
Integrated means connected. Not broken or separated . Do you get it? The old testament is connected to the new . Things prophesied in the old fulfilled in the new .
By the way I'm not claiming the scripture is not broken. I'm telling you what the scripture has said.
If you're going to discuss or dispute the scripture, you gotta learn what's in it .
-->
@Mall
By the way I'm not claiming the scripture is not broken.
FFS! that is exactly what you have claimed. And asked me if I agreed. .
HERE>> Mall wrote: from the new testament in the book of Ephesians and Hebrews, the scripture is not broken. So you do agree.
If you're going to discuss or dispute the scripture, you gotta learn what's in it .
I believe I know it pretty well.
Tell me ,Mall. Do you accept and rely only what is written in the bible for your religious education and not any other outside sources?
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived." Isaac Asimov
-->
@Mall
True.
At best, biblical compilations amount to a regional mythology.
And true also, most theists never question the veracity of the data.
They just accept what they were told.
Just turning up occasionally to sing a few songs and mutter a few prayers.
But hey, if that's what makes them feel good...That's holy.
есть центр который проникает в мозг человека
-->
@zedvictor4
I could challenge you on what you said but I forecast us going into circles.
So I'll say I respect your view on the holy scriptures.
-->
@Stephen
I don't know what you mean by religious education.
Are you talking about being in all that theological study like going to cemetery schools?
I think it's seminary, right , seminary school.
-->
@Mall
If you're going to discuss or dispute the scripture, you gotta learn what's in it .I believe I know it pretty well.Tell me ,Mall. Do you accept and rely only what is written in the bible for your religious education and not any other outside sources?I don't know what you mean by religious education.
😂
Are you talking about being in all that theological study like going to cemetery schools?
🤣
I think it's seminary, right , seminary school.
😂😂😂 You've made my day.
Tell me ,Mall. Do you accept and rely only what is written in the bible?
-->
@Stephen
Depends on what you mean by rely on it.
I don't rely on it to do algebra.
For instance I rely on it in circumstances where I correct you on your error about it because what I rely on is written.
-->
@Mall
Depends on what you mean by rely on it.
Do you rely on it to be truthful, sincere and honest enough and believable enough to be able with confidence to preach it as fact to others?
I don't rely on it to do algebra.
Stop being so fkn childish.
For instance I rely on it in circumstances where I correct you on your error about it because what I rely on is written.
What is it that you believe that you have corrected me on, Mall?
-->
@Stephen
I think you were one of the ones that was in error about the old testament not prophesying about Jesus.
I don't feel confident to preach the scriptures because I have not been called to be a preacher. See that's how that works. The scripture also teaches that. You have to be a God called sent preacher first.
So you can continue to interview or psychoanalyze me. Doesn't refute my points comrade.
-->
@Mall
I think you were one of the ones that was in error about the old testament not prophesying about Jesus.
That's correct. But it was I that showed you that you and all those other bible thicko's that the so called OT prophesies had nothing to do with a man named Jesus that was to be born 800 years in the future. And, just like you that dislikes going over old ground, I to won't be going over old ground.
So you can continue to interview or psychoanalyze me. Doesn't refute my points comrade.
You have made no points.
-->
@Stephen
I have made no points you can refute, you're correct. That much you got right.
You're still playing semantics with names because you know that's the only ace up your sleeve.
But if I ask you who was Christ Jesus ,who would you say he was?
Don't answer that because you'll get refuted again.
-->
@Mall
I have made no points you can refute
Nope, you have made no points, fullstop!!
You're still playing semantics with names because you know that's the only ace up your sleeve.
An ace none the less you fool. But I have a few more. And if the bible is to be believed then there is nothing "semantic" concerning the name of the expected and prophesised about Messiah.
But if I ask you who was Christ Jesus ,who would you say he was?
Well its not a name at all is it, you clown? Does Joshua be Yusuf mean anything at all to you?
-->
@Stephen
@RaymondSheen
Don't debate me on the scripture, just stay out of it.
-->
@Mall
Don't debate me on the scripture, just stay out of it.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Stop fkn crying you big TIT!!!.
Is that because you don't know what religious education is nor means?
Mall wrote: I don't know what you mean by religious education.
#98 😂
-->
@Stephen
@RaymondSheen
It's because I'll and we will keep exposing your error in the scripture.
All you can do is laugh at your own folly.
-->
@Mall
It's because I'll and we will keep exposing your error in the scripture.
What's "because"? What do you believe you have exposed?
I think you'll find that you have exposed your own pure ignorance when you posted this statement:
And stop responding if you do not want to discuss or debate with me as you requested above, HERE>> Mall wrote: Don't debate me on the scripture, just stay out of it.#106
Off you go now thicky. 😂
-->
@Stephen
@RaymondSheen
Acknowledge your error on the scripture.
You know you made error. That's why you keep laughing at your self. When you're wrong, you downplay it with amusing yourself, you start name calling, getting stirred up.
At this point it's not even constructive anymore.
-->
@Mall
Acknowledge your error on the scripture.
No. I have made none.
You know you made error.
No. I have made none you clown.
Mall wrote: Don't debate me on the scripture, just stay out of it.#106
Then simply stop responding, idiot!
-->
@Stephen
Calling me names don't make your wrong points right. That's what you guys do when you lose, you resort to name calling.
Just stay in denial. Let me ask this since you been inquiring things of me, did you know atheists are just as religious as theists?
Calling me names don't make your wrong points right.
But I always give credit where it is due. So I won't be making any exceptions in your case. I think you are a clown and as such you are dually accredited.
That's what you guys do when you lose, you resort to name calling.
what have I lost? You have made claims that you simply cannot support and then simply made unsupported statements. You are a fkn clown.
Just stay in denial. Let me ask this since you been inquiring things of me,
I have nothing as yet to deny. I have only asked you to support your claims with BIBLICAL evidence you clown. And you have failed every single time......because you are a clown.
did you know atheists are just as religious as theists?
So! WHAT'S YOUR POINT YOU IDIOT!?
I can respond as much as my prerogative gives.
OF COURSE YOU CAN, YOU CLOWN, BUT YOU HAVE SAID : Mall wrote: Don't debate me on the scripture, just stay out of it.#106
MAKE YOUR FKN MIND UP YOU IDIOT!
Now go away and find a fellow clown or idiot that is happy to put up with your absolute BULLSHIT! The Reverend Tradesecret is more on your level in the theological field , he knows fk all about scripture either.
Off you go now..
44 days later
The Bible is the inspired word of God. It may not be aspiring to those raised on less inspiring works of man.