-->
@Stephen
Expand on what?
Did you know this about the holy scriptures?
Posts
Total:
114
-->
@zedvictor4
We're talking about holiness of the scriptures.
-->
@Tradesecret
I was just making the point of what's man made because people confuse that.
-->
@Mall
Yup and from the new testament in the book of Ephesians and Hebrews, the scripture is not broken.So you do agree.You will have to expand on that, Mall.Expand on what?
On your comment above, Mall. I don't understand what it is that you are asking me.
-->
@Stephen
When you say "that", be specific.
You say "comment", what in the comment?
I don't want to go everything if I don't have to.
You say "comment", what in the comment?
I don't want to go everything if I don't have to.
Yup and from the new testament in the book of Ephesians and Hebrews, the scripture is not broken. So you do agree.On your comment above, Mall. I don't understand what it is that you are asking me. You will have to expand on that, Mall.When you say "that", be specific.
You are asking me "do I agree". I am asking you , do I agree with what?
You say "comment", what in the comment?
What the fuck do you mean by "the scripture is not broken"!? I need you to expand on that as I haven't a clue as to what the fk you are asking me,
I don't want to go everything if I don't have to.
And neither do I. It can become a fkn pain in the arse when people simply play dumb and cannot read what they themselves have written.
-->
@Mall
We're talking about the holiness of the scriptures.
So was I.
Data management as it were, as it is.
Overthink...The evolution of ideas...The evolution of everything.
If you see the word evolution as a threat, then alternatively you could refer to it as progression.
Holiness to Wholiness.
-->
@zedvictor4
Since you say you were talking about holiness of the scriptures, what does it teach regarding holiness?
Please provide the book , chapter of the book and verse.
-->
@Mall
As suggested.
One would assume that holiness within the context of recorded data relative to a creation hypothesis, lies not in the "scripture", but in the mind of a thinking observer.
The "book" itself is an emotionless paper and ink construct.
-->
@zedvictor4
I take that as you don't know. Scripture does say speak on what you know.
-->
@Mall
You either will or will not extract meaning from my narratives.
It's simply a data assessment and choice thing.
Same for me of course.
For me, holiness is word describing an abstract concept, which relative to their conditioning, some observers will convert into an emotive response.
From my point of view, the biblical narrative does not induce an emotive response.
So I've just spoken on what I know.
-->
@Mall
Scripture does say speak on what you know.
Does it!? Then why haven't you spoke of what you know after being asked multiple times to explain what you know and mean:
HERE>>> #66
-->
@Stephen
Good morning Steven.
Tarik had a similar style to Mall.
Though I suppose it's fair to say that we all have a particular style.
-->
@zedvictor4
Good morning Steven. Tarik had a similar style to Mall. Though I suppose it's fair to say that we all have a particular style.
Indeed. Syntax. Its that most people just cannot disguise their linguistic expression no matter how hard they try. Something the Reverend Tradesecret could never seemed to understand while posting under his various user names and on at least three occasions on this forum to my knowledge.
Hope all is well there in Wales Vic. Election soon.
I wonder, what has anyone got to lose by voting Reform? UK is already in what seems to be an irreversible meltdown with bloody revolution on the horizon.
All the best, Vic.
-->
@Stephen
Because the scripture also teaches about speaking plainly. So when you do so, be specific and not broad about your question or request.
-->
@zedvictor4
Stiff-necked and hardness of heart.
-->
@Mall
Because the scripture also teaches about speaking plainly. So when you do so, be specific and not broad about your question or request.
You have asked me "do I agree" that "the scripture is not broken.".
I don't know what you mean. I asked you to explain what you mean by "the scripture is not broken."
SO, i'll ask you again: what do you mean when YOU have asked me "DO I AGREE THAT THE SCRIPTURES ARE UNBROKEN"!?
-->
@Stephen
Scripture also teaches stir them not up.
Anyway, when something is not broken, it is connected. It is integrated. The old testament is integral to the new and vice versa.
Regardless of what you think you understand, the old prophesies the new. The new has fulfilled the old including the arrival of Jesus Christ according to the scriptures.
-->
@Mall
The old prophesies the new
Lets stay with your first comment, ffs!
What do you mean by saying ""the scripture is not broken.".?
Im sooooooo Looking foward to finding out
the meaning of.....
A un broken scripture.
I hope to GOD we dont have
( A ) broken scriptures.
Andddd
( B ) unbroken scripture.
As Differentiating
( A ) Literal scriptures.
From
( B ) Non literal scrips is hard enough.
Holy scriptures.
BAMMMMMMMMM.,
That just triggered my oxymoron alarm for some reason.
Why might this be. ?
Holy. = SOMETHING OF GREAT IMPORTANCE.
Scriptures = A NONSENSE format.
NOW IF we ADD them Bitches up.
WHAT DO WE GET .
= ( Really important nonsense. )
Oh thats why.
But The way ( Holy scriptures ) triggeres my ( oxy alarm ) it ain't nothing on the way
( biblical scholar ) triggers it.
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Im sooooooo Looking foward to finding outthe meaning of.....A un broken scripture.
So am I Deb. He's done nothing but swerve since he was asked to expand on this/his particular comment ; I have asked for clarity 7 times now.
-->
@Stephen
I never vote Stephen, though our current bloke knows a good bet when he sees one. LOL.
Doesn't matter who gets in...Six months down the line and Messer's Hislop and Merton, will be ripping them to shreds on a Friday evening.
It's all entertainment.
Call me a conspiracy theorist if you like, but I'm of the opinion that until you topple those who are really pulling the strings, then the system is never going to change.
The Establishment.
-->
@Mall
Stiff-necked and hardness of heart.
Here's another.
Sure-footed and open-minded.
-->
@zedvictor4
The Establishment.
Corporations, Vic. They are the new gods in the new age. Its out with the old and in with the new. The new gods are implementing the "Great Reset" in the belief they will" Build Back Better" to usher in the "New Normal" .
The clock has been reset Vic. We are witnessing the great change over that I have spoken about here many times.
Checkout those quotes above Vic. They were intended by our world leaders for "those that have ears".
Call me a conspiracy theorist if you like
See above, Vic.
Pub today for me.
Have a nice day Vic.
-->
@Stephen
Those big brewing conglomerates for example.
Have one for me.
Mines a nice crisp independently brewed IPA.
-->
@zedvictor4
Yes you're giving you're opinion on things for others to be open minded to . Not so much adhering to the objectives of the center topics of discussion.
-->
@Stephen
Anyway, when something is not broken, it is connected. It is integrated. The old testament is integral to the new and vice versa.
Regardless of what you think you understand, the old prophesies the new. The new has fulfilled the old including the arrival of Jesus Christ according to the scriptures.
This was my explanation of that. What are you not understanding here?
-->
@Mall
So, precisely when were "scriptures" compiled and by whom?
How can you ensure the veracity of the data.
And how can you vouch for the honesty of the compiler/s.
-->
@Mall
What are you not understanding here?
I am nor understanding you claim that "the scripture is not broken.".?
Saying the OT is "integral" to the NT doesn't explain what you mean by "the scripture is not broken".
So you are obviously on two short planks side of the matter of your own statement I will assume that you are claiming that the BIBLE from the first page to its last has no leaps in history, nothing expunged, nothing added, nothing extrapolated and is one single unbroken story? Would that be correct?