Chess Mafia DP2

Author: AustinL0926

Posts

Read-only
Total: 435
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,822
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
Earth: Strong town. At this point, the double confirmation should ensure that he's basically guaranteed to be town, especially given the info I received afterward regarding the inability of scum to redirect or prevent me from using the 1X Cop. I'm frustrated that I ended up double confirming him instead of getting insight into someone else, but we have no reason to doubt Earth at this point. Even if you doubt me at this point (and frankly, I haven't confirmed myself just by using the role I was given), he's pretty solid.

Moozer: Lean town. The only way I could reason that he was scum based on anything he's done (and it's not a lot) is based on his claim, and much as I buy the possibility that he has a scum partner who came up with it, I don't buy that said scum partner also told him to out that claim without pressure. That does not add up to me. Behaviorally, he's null, but since this is what I have to go with, that's where I'm placing him.

Luna: Very slight townread. I'm having a really hard time reading him this game. For the most part, I like his reads, but I don't get seeing Pie as his top town read given what's been revealed so far. He suggests there's some other reason for this view, but in the absence of more information, I'm kind of puzzled on why he thinks Pie leans so hard into town. He's been incisive, and in DP1 I read his behavior as town, hence the townread.

Pie: Probably the closest to a town lean based on his behavior last DP, though in my reassessing things this DP, he ends up more null to me, particularly after those reads. Just like Luna, he's not very specific about what makes Luna look townie to him beyond being more incisive with Supa. I get that that makes it less likely that they're a scum team together, but he seems to be hedging a bit on this read with the "but you never know" at the end. I guess he's ending up with Barney in scum through PoE and frustration that he hasn't answered questions yet, which makes more sense to me given what I know of Barney's behavior as scum. The fact that he's claimed to have a confirmable role means he'll either be cleared or at the top of my scum list next DP, so he's not the focus of my attention right now.

Barney: There just haven't been enough posts for me to make heads or tails of his behavior so far. I'd support at least getting a character claim from him at this point, since he's currently the player we know the least about behaviorally beyond Moozer, and that's not something I'm willing to let slide.

Vader: I still have to go back through DP1 to see if his shift to voting JoeBob makes sense based on how he posted (he seemed very adamant that it wasn't JoeBob for a while and I'm still not sure what convinced him). Also, he currently has Moozer in his PoE and I just don't understand his reasoning. So Moozer, who has largely been absent from this game, is also a part of a pretty quickly performing scum team (that was not a long NP) and likely contributed to the Savant NK, despite having a partner who is significantly more experienced? I don't know where that read is coming from. I do see the potential of buddying between Pie and Luna, but his basis for sussing them beyond that seems pretty weak.


So, I'd like to pursue more info from Barney first. Vader would be my second choice, though we can discuss that after Barney claims at least his character. VTL Barney. I want that sandwich.
Moozer325
Moozer325's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 1,186
3
2
8
Moozer325's avatar
Moozer325
3
2
8
-->
@ILikePie5
I did nothing, seeing as I only have one shot, so I better use it well
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,162
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Moozer325
I did nothing, seeing as I only have one shot, so I better use it well
Can you elaborate?
Moozer325
Moozer325's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 1,186
3
2
8
Moozer325's avatar
Moozer325
3
2
8
-->
@ILikePie5
I can only use my ability, protecting one person and making one other person's ability untamperable for one night.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,162
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Moozer325
I can only use my ability, protecting one person and making one other person's ability untamperable for one night.
Interesting.

Okay, who do you think is mafia and who do you think is town?
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,162
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Vader
Pie - I think Pie would likely be my top scum read. His spearheading of a JoeBob lynch is quite literally the exact opposite of how he played last game with some minor similiarities.
So wouldn’t this make me town?

As I stated in Option 3 of my theories, I don't put it past Pie to go and push a Savant NK to give himself town cred using the WIFOM strategy. Seems like that behavior analyzing and all that is something he tends to do. 
But I didn’t use the WIFOM strategy?
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,162
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
Pie: Probably the closest to a town lean based on his behavior last DP, though in my reassessing things this DP, he ends up more null to me, particularly after those reads. Just like Luna, he's not very specific about what makes Luna look townie to him beyond being more incisive with Supa. I get that that makes it less likely that they're a scum team together, but he seems to be hedging a bit on this read with the "but you never know" at the end. I guess he's ending up with Barney in scum through PoE and frustration that he hasn't answered questions yet, which makes more sense to me given what I know of Barney's behavior as scum. The fact that he's claimed to have a confirmable role means he'll either be cleared or at the top of my scum list next DP, so he's not the focus of my attention right now.
Scum are probably going to kill me anyways cause I stated I have a confirmable role
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@whiteflame
Maybe I'm misreading this... Austin is the host, so what are you trying to say?
I received a PM from the mod (Austin) saying that I had access to the "chess engine" as a result of something that happened. It was not stated who I received it from, but with Earth's claim, I think we can assume it came from him. What's unclear?
I didn't notice Earth mentioned in the previous post. So it read as if you were talking about town confirming the host.

Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
For the sake of progressing things... I'm a tactic.

Dashboard
PLAYER                        ROLE                            CHAR__________          _NP1

2. Pie                               ???                                   ???                              
3. whiteflame              ???                                   ???                           Copped Earth Inno
4. Moozer              BG+Protector                Castling
6. Lunatic                      ???                                  ???
7. Vader                          ???                                  ???
8. Barney                       ???                                "tactic"
9. Earth                     Stockfish                 "chess engine"            Gave WF chess engine

Killed/Lynched

1. Savant              Miller+Soldier                 Pawn
5. Joebob            Flipped Tracker     Algebraic Notation

ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,162
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Barney
For the sake of progressing things... I'm a tactic.
At this point you need to full claim
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Vader
Option 1. Scum know every role in the game. Least likely but in DP1 they know what everyone's role is, so thus they knew they needed to kill JoeBob NP1. Even then this is the least likely possibility because I doubt there is a mechanic that broken in the game
I mean that still wouldn't be a priority role for them to kill though, you would think they would be targeting power roles over soldier np1. 

Option 2. Scum has a noob on the team which results in this action. This includes a player who is overly-paranoid about certain things and tends to overthink. Plus a noob player
This could be the case. Or dun dun dun.... They want us to think there is a noob on the team...

Option 3. Pie is scum. Pie tried to draw WIFOM on us with the Savant lynch. He is known to have a policy lynch of Miller's DP2. He could use the argument of "if I was scum why would I kill Savant when I could draw mislynch based on my policy DP2." I could see Pie running with this
This one makes the least sense to me. Pie as scum would 100% have left savant alive and this is one of the main reasons I am town reading him. Also I don't think Pie would have gone as hard as he did on joebob last day phase as scum. Not that he wouldn't be aggressive per se, but I think the aggression would have looked different. I think pie was genuinely pursuing the best lynch option last day phase, where I think as scum he might have gone for someone like barney, me or whiteflame instead. But savant I think pie would 100% try and mislynch. 

I think these are the 3 choices that I have on the table at the moment. The fit for the category of 2 for overthinking or players would aren't as active would be Moozer as a Noob. The second scum partner could be WF. No offense but I've seen WF tend to overthink sometimes when it comes to mafia and it's very possible he overthought the Miller and wanted to lynch. I could also see Barney or Earth doing this as well. Players who tend to take a backseat during the game and let town eat at themselves and debate on this. Option 3 means that Pie is scum for sure but who is his buddy
Barney killed me off pretty quick when he was scum in pie's game, and I dont think I had even really shown any indication of scum reading them at that point. I think Barney's MO is more to target active players. Could be wrong. The night kill was definitely an interesting choice, and I guess I can see whiteflame potentially overthinking it. Really have no clue what earth would do. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Vader
Can you explain what made you change your opinion on this issue between last night and tonight so quickly?
It wasn’t “quick” it was an 13 hour time differential between the two and I read more into JoeBob where he posted more and outted his role. I wasn’t even fully caught up by the time I wrote 147 and when I explained by being very aggressive on him. To be clear I voted from behavioral analysis and role utility and likelihood of scum and not because of some stupid grammar mistake that 80% of the world makes. I also know town has outted enough info to potential scum at this point so I think out of all the people to lynch in DP1, JoeBob is who I consider the most scummy. I even had him as a scum read in my original analysis. I can go deeper if you’d like
What about pie's behavior was "aggressive" then? Because when you voted for joebob it was an exact echo of all the thoughts pie had made throughout the day phase. The grammar thing was barely mentioned after being the initial reason for him targeting joebob in the first place. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Moozer325
I can only use my ability, protecting one person and making one other person's ability untamperable for one night.
Hypothetical gun to your head situation, you had to lynch someone right now, who it would it be and why?
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Barney
What is MISO? I am guessing MYLO but what is the acronym? Also why do you keep listing moozer as a bodyguard protector? He says protect, not sacrifice himself for, so wouldn't that function more as 1x universal doctor? and the second part of his role as an enabler seing as he prevents  a rook from essentially being roleblocked?
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@ILikePie5
Pie - I think Pie would likely be my top scum read. His spearheading of a JoeBob lynch is quite literally the exact opposite of how he played last game with some minor similiarities.
So wouldn’t this make me town?
the problem with me is that it's too 180 imo. Don't get me wrong if you played different but kept some of the same parts of last game I would think you are town asf, but this is a complete 180 imo, almost as if it's a calculated maneuver to flip people into thinking you are town 

As I stated in Option 3 of my theories, I don't put it past Pie to go and push a Savant NK to give himself town cred using the WIFOM strategy. Seems like that behavior analyzing and all that is something he tends to do. 
But I didn’t use the WIFOM strategy?
You won't now that I pointed it out, that's one of the only reasons why I could see scum lynching Savant besides the other 2 options
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@Lunatic
Can you explain what made you change your opinion on this issue between last night and tonight so quickly?
It wasn’t “quick” it was an 13 hour time differential between the two and I read more into JoeBob where he posted more and outted his role. I wasn’t even fully caught up by the time I wrote 147 and when I explained by being very aggressive on him. To be clear I voted from behavioral analysis and role utility and likelihood of scum and not because of some stupid grammar mistake that 80% of the world makes. I also know town has outted enough info to potential scum at this point so I think out of all the people to lynch in DP1, JoeBob is who I consider the most scummy. I even had him as a scum read in my original analysis. I can go deeper if you’d like
What about pie's behavior was "aggressive" then? Because when you voted for joebob it was an exact echo of all the thoughts pie had made throughout the day phase. The grammar thing was barely mentioned after being the initial reason for him targeting joebob in the first place. 
Pie based those thoughts originally on JoeBob's grammar and pushing him on that. At when you are referencing, I was still only 2-3 pages in and only saw that as a push. When I started to catch up into the DP and saw JoeBob's claim is when I started to put into my scum pile and I had him as a top scum read that entire DP. I didn't drastically change my vote but I kept reading the DP to catch up. Pie's analysis was more based on behavior and mine included some behavior but was more focused on role analytics and psych more than anything. Not really buddying off Pie's logic. Plus as JoeBob kept typing the more he attributed the reasons I voted him. Things change in a DP and when you catch up and the DP goes on you see it progress... you've been playing mafia for longer than I've been in high school and college, you should know that's how these things work
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@Lunatic
What about pie's behavior was "aggressive" then? 
To answer this because I don't really think I did in the last post, Pie directly targeted and used minuet details to build up an argument. He kept pushing on JoeBob constantly that caused JoeBob to break down IMO. He kept pushing and pushing and getting town to lynch him hard that caused JoeBob to slip up and be behaviorally scum read. Plus the role as well being outted
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Vader
I didn't drastically change my vote but I kept reading the DP to catch up. Pie's analysis was more based on behavior and mine included some behavior but was more focused on role analytics and psych more than anything. 

To answer this because I don't really think I did in the last post, Pie directly targeted and used minuet details to build up an argument. He kept pushing on JoeBob constantly that caused JoeBob to break down IMO. He kept pushing and pushing and getting town to lynch him hard that caused JoeBob to slip up and be behaviorally scum read. Plus the role as well being outted
I am all for the "changed my mind argument". However the "we had different reasons for voting" argument... hmmm...

I find this interesting. Lets dissect the real reasons then and see what the differences were between your reasons and pies reasons. Shall we?

Your post 268 is where you actually end up voting him. 

Reason 1: The useless role argument.

Pies words post 165 There’s no reason for scum to kill him. If he’s town then his results are delayed anyways. Let’s assume for sake of argument we lynch a townie today and NK is success. It becomes 5-2. We’d only be able to lynch JoeBob and it would be 3-2 LYLO with one result assuming he’s telling the truth. It makes no sense. One night’s worth of results for getting himself lynched? I don’t like it at all. I’m fine lynching him today

Supa's words: I am kind of just analyzing this now, but let's look deeper into his role for a second. We can only see what types of actions he did after he dies. This essentially makes him useless for what we know and his mechanic. Because the only point where we can actually lynch JoeBob is DP2 if he is actually town. Let's think for a second. The only way we even get info from him is if he dies. This means it gives him an excuse as to why he's staying alive as a tracker and word of mouth for the most part. We can't lynch him DP3 because it comes down to this. Lets say we lynch town DP1. 5v2 likely. The only way we can get info and not lose the game is if we lynch DP2 and that's only 1 NP of information and at that point it is a policy lynch. If town is fine with that then, not sure. 

Literally an exact echo.

Reason 2: Joebob is being defensive

Pie's words to joebob: And your behavior at this point. Never seen you so defensive.
Pies words to me about joebob: He’s strawmanning my argument which I picked up as well. 

Supa's words: I also am looking at behavior and JoeBob is acting a bit unusual from what I've seen him play as town. He is somewhat deflecting the main criticism and just pushing it as "idiot town" and "tunnelling" and not fully addressing the point of why we are suspicious of him. 


Another Echo.

So again supa, how was yall's reasoning any different? Pie was either too agressive or he wasn't. I would accept a simple "I changed my mind" but you are actually trying to tell me you voted joebob for different reasons then pies and i'm not seeing the differences. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
During the NP, I received a message from Austin saying that I was granted access to a "chess engine" at the expense of my night action, which functioned as a 1X Cop. Based on the claim he just gave of Stockfish (which is a chess engine), I can confirm that he targeted me. Unfortunately, I made the decision to target him (he obviously copped innocent), so he's basically double confirmed at this point.


So to clarify, you declined access to the chess engine? Were you told what it would do? 
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@Lunatic
I didn't drastically change my vote but I kept reading the DP to catch up. Pie's analysis was more based on behavior and mine included some behavior but was more focused on role analytics and psych more than anything. 

To answer this because I don't really think I did in the last post, Pie directly targeted and used minuet details to build up an argument. He kept pushing on JoeBob constantly that caused JoeBob to break down IMO. He kept pushing and pushing and getting town to lynch him hard that caused JoeBob to slip up and be behaviorally scum read. Plus the role as well being outted
I am all for the "changed my mind argument". However the "we had different reasons for voting" argument... hmmm...
I am not saying that we didn't have the same reasoning. We both scum read him for the same reasons behaviorally, but we voted for him for different reasons. Pie's was more behavioral and mine was more role utility
I find this interesting. Lets dissect the real reasons then and see what the differences were between your reasons and pies reasons. Shall we?

Your post 268 is where you actually end up voting him. 

Reason 1: The useless role argument.

Pies words post 165 There’s no reason for scum to kill him. If he’s town then his results are delayed anyways. Let’s assume for sake of argument we lynch a townie today and NK is success. It becomes 5-2. We’d only be able to lynch JoeBob and it would be 3-2 LYLO with one result assuming he’s telling the truth. It makes no sense. One night’s worth of results for getting himself lynched? I don’t like it at all. I’m fine lynching him today

Supa's words: I am kind of just analyzing this now, but let's look deeper into his role for a second. We can only see what types of actions he did after he dies. This essentially makes him useless for what we know and his mechanic. Because the only point where we can actually lynch JoeBob is DP2 if he is actually town. Let's think for a second. The only way we even get info from him is if he dies. This means it gives him an excuse as to why he's staying alive as a tracker and word of mouth for the most part. We can't lynch him DP3 because it comes down to this. Lets say we lynch town DP1. 5v2 likely. The only way we can get info and not lose the game is if we lynch DP2 and that's only 1 NP of information and at that point it is a policy lynch. If town is fine with that then, not sure. 

Literally an exact echo.
That's the same reasoning doesn't mean that's why Pie primarily pushed him. It's basic mechanic on his role. Can't argue mechanics and how we go about it because that's a game mechanic.
Reason 2: Joebob is being defensive

Pie's words to joebob: And your behavior at this point. Never seen you so defensive.
Pies words to me about joebob: He’s strawmanning my argument which I picked up as well. 

Supa's words: I also am looking at behavior and JoeBob is acting a bit unusual from what I've seen him play as town. He is somewhat deflecting the main criticism and just pushing it as "idiot town" and "tunnelling" and not fully addressing the point of why we are suspicious of him. 


Another Echo.
I never said MY reasons for lynching were different. I said what PUSHED the votes were different. Pie's push started from the grammar mistake which I simply read as not enough to base a read. When his behavior started to get more defensive and more SPECIFICALLY when he OUTTED HIS ROLE is when I was convinced he was scum. 

Here is what exactly I said: 
 Pie's analysis was more based on behavior and mine included some behavior but was more focused on role analytics and psych more than anything. Not really buddying off Pie's logic. Plus as JoeBob kept typing the more he attributed the reasons I voted him
No where does this imply that I stated "we had different reads and had different reasons. This just implies that I put more merit into my vote into the role analysis than Pie did. That's not implying anything. 

Then you are going to say... then why did you agree with Pie's reasonings???? I agreed with Pie's reasoning because they are true. You can say true things as scum... I know I sure as hell did when playing in your game that built my town cred up before I fucked up the game. Right reasons, wrong party. I suspect Pie because he pushed so hard on JoeBob before JoeBob even had behavioral analysis in the beggining. It's like Pie sort of forced that behavior out of JoeBob to start a wagon?

So again supa, how was yall's reasoning any different? Pie was either too agressive or he wasn't. I would accept a simple "I changed my mind" but you are actually trying to tell me you voted joebob for different reasons then pies and i'm not seeing the differences. 
My read was consistent as I read the game. I first wasn't seeing why JoeBob was being pressured on grammar, then his behavior started to come into question, then the role analysis and why it was shit... that's my logic. Evolving with the game and the post just as mafia. If that's change my mind, then sure, but to me that's just getting new information

I had similiar reasons to Pie, just as you had similiar reasons too? How does that make me MORE scum compared to Pie? In fact you seem to be awfully town read of Pie but yet when I have the same belief he did, you scum read me more when I was catching up to the game and my final verdict. 


Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
I am not saying that we didn't have the same reasoning. We both scum read him for the same reasons behaviorally, but we voted for him for different reasons. Pie's was more behavioral and mine was more role utility
The primary reason has nothing to do with this argument. It's been stated multiple times that was the most minor part of his FOS. It was an opener into questioning joebob. You said you have different reasons, but literally parroted every point. 

That's the same reasoning doesn't mean that's why Pie primarily pushed him. It's basic mechanic on his role. Can't argue mechanics and how we go about it because that's a game mechanic.
Again, above ^

I never said MY reasons for lynching were different. I said what PUSHED the votes were different. Pie's push started from the grammar mistake which I simply read as not enough to base a read. When his behavior started to get more defensive and more SPECIFICALLY when he OUTTED HIS ROLE is when I was convinced he was scum. 
Joebobs defensive behavior was before your posts in 147/149 where you were downplaying pies argument on joebob and calling him over aggressive. 
It was within the first few posts of him getting pushed.


Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
The primary reason has nothing to do with this argument. It's been stated multiple times that was the most minor part of his FOS. It was an opener into questioning joebob. You said you have different reasons, but literally parroted every point. 
This simply isn’t true lmao. I said my reasonings for voting were similar but I didn’t analyze it fully until I caught up in the 5 pages of posts that were built up. My behavior reads were similar to Pie’s

The role mechanics sure, there mechanics and are the same, can’t argue mechanics.

Even then I had a completely different reason into voting him too that I tried to keep hidden to not leak info out there, but I guess since this looks like it’s going to be constant, I figured I’d say it. I’d rather not say now unless the town really would want me to 


Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@ILikePie5
For the sake of progressing things... I'm a tactic.
At this point you need to full claim
If that's your idea of a joke, you need to try harder. There are four people who have less outed information, yourself included. By any standard, you're being a dullard.
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@Lunatic
What is MISO? I am guessing MYLO but what is the acronym? Also why do you keep listing moozer as a bodyguard protector? He says protect, not sacrifice himself for, so wouldn't that function more as 1x universal doctor? and the second part of his role as an enabler seing as he prevents  a rook from essentially being roleblocked?
I misremembered the short phrase, it should have been MILO; got an S where there should be an L... Granted, these short forms are annoying for not being acronyms.

Whiteflame did most of the dashboard building so far this game, including adding Moozer's role. It did occur to me that it doesn't line up quite right, but I can't think of what the rook part of the role would equate to in a normal game, so I've left it as is. At a glance, we remember that he's some type of protector, and we have a link to his original claim if we need to drill down later in the game for actions which do not match claims.

Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Vader
Even then I had a completely different reason into voting him too that I tried to keep hidden to not leak info out there, but I guess since this looks like it’s going to be constant, I figured I’d say it. I’d rather not say now unless the town really would want me to 

Can't say my curiosity hasnt been piqued.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Barney
I misremembered the short phrase, it should have been MILO; got an S where there should be an L... Granted, these short forms are annoying for not being acronyms.

Whiteflame did most of the dashboard building so far this game, including adding Moozer's role. It did occur to me that it doesn't line up quite right, but I can't think of what the rook part of the role would equate to in a normal game, so I've left it as is. At a glance, we remember that he's some type of protector, and we have a link to his original claim if we need to drill down later in the game for actions which do not match claims.

Fair enough I suppose.

Any thoughts on supa? 
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@Lunatic
Supa/Vader is an interesting query. He basically taught me how to play this game, and he used to be kinda obvious when scum, but still won in spite of that. He'd basically confuse the issue with a major gambit, then NK whomever was saying he was scum, and then everyone would forget. Now days, I'd say look for patterns he forms a little too early.

This game, he claims to have some useful power... If it's proven he doesn't, then we lynch, but that isn't today..
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,947
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Barney
Supa/Vader is an interesting query. He basically taught me how to play this game, and he used to be kinda obvious when scum, but still won in spite of that. He'd basically confuse the issue with a major gambit, then NK whomever was saying he was scum, and then everyone would forget. Now days, I'd say look for patterns he forms a little too early.

This game, he claims to have some useful power... If it's proven he doesn't, then we lynch, but that isn't today..
His flip flop on the joebob thing yesterday is really what's got me tripping out. Also I have played with supa for ages, and I didn't ever really think of him as a "amazing" player  (no offense supa). However in the last game I modded with him I thought he played it really amazingly until he got CC'ed. I was very surprised by his level of skill, he predicted most town roles, even called out that you were likely damien darkblood in the last game, but still ended up risking it for some reason. Idk I just feel a little extra paranoid of him because he has shown such a jump in his skill that maybe in this game I am eyeing him a little too closely. But I agree he better have a role that justifies some of his actions last day phase, as he indeed claims he does. 

Thoughts on Moozer? 
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,822
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Lunatic
@Moozer325
So to clarify, you declined access to the chess engine? Were you told what it would do? 
I was told I would receive the alignment of the player I chose. I used it. I was told I could accept or decline, and I chose to accept, targeting Earth.

Also, to your point about whether Moozer is BG or some other protective role is valid, but I did ask him about that last DP and never got an answer. So I left my initial assumption up. I've tagged him again on this in hopes that he'll clarify.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,822
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Vader
@ILikePie5
Alright, given that we're not getting traction on the effort to get a claim out of Barney (at least for now - I'll come back to this), I'd like to at least start getting a set of softclaims, which could help with some theme analysis. The difficulty is, as Pie expressed early in the DP, there isn't a lot of overlap between the claims on the table: Algebraic Notation, Pawn, Stockfish, Castling.

That being said, it wouldn't be the first time I've seen a game where scum have a uniting theme and town just doesn't, and so I'd like to at least start to narrow the window for everyone who currently has not softclaimed. I've already stated that I'm also a strategy, so I'd put myself in the "tactic" bucket as well. I think Luna has been pushing a soft claim since the start of the DP, but I'd nonetheless like to get some clarity as to which camp he falls into. So far, we've seen tactics (using Stockfish), individual moves (Castling), and pieces (Pawn). Algebraic Notation is more just a descriptor that covers all these things to some degree.

So if you fall into one of these camps, state which one, and if not, state what camp you do fall into. Since I haven't seen evidence of a softclaim from either of you, I'm tagging you two first, and I'm taking my vote off for now.

Unvote