-->
@Barney
It was just random that I picked Dp5. Like rolling a dice.
How Soldier has appeared in previous games doesn't necessarily dictate how it will appear in this game, but if I remember correctly, the role you're thinking about is Survivor.
Second, my issue with the wagon on JoeBob isn’t that there is no basis for it. I’ve already acknowledged the lurking as a basis (and, to a lesser extent, the sheeping). My problem has been the specific behavioral cues that are setting people off, all of which seem to be issues that don’t take into account his past play and view in him a vacuum, which has become the common means of eliminating newer players early for some reason, often to our detriment. Beyond that, it would be one thing if they were pursuing him for a claim. It’s quite another to say that these reasons are sufficient for a lynch. I’m fine with pushing on him for future DPs. I want more information, which is part of the reason I’m fine with the lynch on GP since it will clear several things up for me. I don’t think just getting a lynch on JoeBob serves us as well (and frankly, I haven’t seen anyone justify its utility beyond just saying he’s behaviorally off), not with such limited scum tells that could easily be the result of playing two games at the same time (the lurking) or his scattered attempts to understand a role that’s been called out as a player who has never seen it before (the sheeping).
This is some serious fluffposting BTW. A paragraph of text boils down to acknowledging the behavioral reads on Joebob, and weakly suggesting pushing him later. I'm skeptical that whiteflame really made a serious attempt to analyze Joebob's behavior.
Explain? I simply think that voting without actually intending to lynch is pointless. It makes the votes effectively meaningless
I'm honestly just so tired of this at this point. I've given my thoughts on JoeBob. I didn't add to them here because I was already clear. All I did was push back on your characterization. And I already am pushing JoeBob, so if you still think I'm scummy, then fine, whatever.
It doesn't. Seeking information with the aim of making a decision based off that information is not meaningless. If the claim isn't convincing, it's a basis for going through with the lynch. If it is convincing, we have an alternative.
I don't know much about whiteflame's meta, but that tone doesn't strike me as very cooperative
It probably won’t tell me flat out, but we could try to peice it together.