-->
@Greyparrot
You wouldn't have to keep repeating yourself if they didn't keep ignoring you.
If he thought they were his, why would he 'return them' without being asked?He returned the documents as soon as he discovered them when no one was even looking for them.
If he thought they were his, why would he 'return them' without being asked?
Listen just because he uses the same words as a right-triber does not mean he should be held to the meaning of those words.
Bullshit.The FBI did not come to him, he came to them
They (the deep state) realized that Biden was the obvious target of a counter-attack and got ahead of it. The timing allows no other conclusion.
I don't think anyone is cooperating until I threaten associates with a decade in prison if they don't blame it on the guy I'm politically targeting.I like how Biden asserting he had done nothing wrong is interpreted as "Cooperating"
Timing? Trump was being investigated for his blatant mishandling of classified documents and obstruction. Nothing about that says 'they're coming for Biden next'.
Now notice all the years Biden didn't give back the classified material. Then notice how he "discovered" (November 2, 2022) some right after they started going after Trump for this (totally made up) crime (Feb. 9, 2022: The National Archives refers the matter to the Justice Department).
Also notice the decades between Trump committing all these NY "Crimes" and anyone going after him.
When the entire country is talking about how the idiot who used to be our president was withholding classified documents to the point they needed a search warrant to get them back, it isn't surprising in the least that it would cause others to look around and say "I don't have any of those do I?"
And I love how lying to federal investigators is to you, a "made up crime". You're hilarious.
So getting ahead of it because they realized the "law" just changed.
I don't care about that fluff, amounts to "resisting arrest" on an unlawful arrest.
It's kinda funny that Biden's last hope is to actually win the election legitimately.
A legal argument being rejected doesn't mean it was wrong. Also there are still plenty of legal arguments to make and from the jury instruction guidance the current judge (who will doubtless be appealed until jack smith is dumped on the sidewalk) seems to think that she should actually read the contents of the law instead of checking in with MSNBC.Declaring an arrest unlawful doesn't make it unlawful. If Trump had a legal argument he would be making it
This seems to have led her to the absurd conclusion that Reagan, Clinton, and Obama didn't steal classified material due to something about them being presidents and the presidential records act letting them decide what is theirs and what isn't.
That's OK, when Trump weaponizes the government to control the media, then the public will be able to see his side.
Funny that you think it's not judges who decide these things <- sarcasm, your own wordsThis seems to have led her to the absurd conclusion that Reagan, Clinton, and Obama didn't steal classified material due to something about them being presidents and the presidential records act letting them decide what is theirs and what isn't.The presidential records act doesn't give president's the power to decide what belongs to them and what belongs to the government, it's literally the opposite. The entire point was to restrict that perceived power as a response to the Watergate fiasco and the threat that Nixon would have just declared the tapes to be his personal property.
Well Putin is way more popular that Trump. He keeps winning elections over and over again. We don't doubt elections without hard proof you know!That's OK, when Trump weaponizes the government to control the media, then the public will be able to see his side.Putin will be so proud.
Putin will be so proud.
Well Putin is way more popular that Trump. He keeps winning elections over and over again. We don't doubt elections without hard proof you know!
Well Putin is way more popular that Trump. He keeps winning elections over and over again. We don't doubt elections without hard proof you know!