All debates

No description has been provided

No description has been provided

This is a battle of musical tastes!

Rap Battle 1. Open Challenge, Open Voting Rules -Swears are allowed -No in tune beats -Judges should judge by rhymes, flow, and length -Grammar shouldn't count unless you can't read it -No plagarism Good luck

I wish to debate in favor of the position that more bad than good came out of giving the women the right to vote in the United States. Anybody want to debate minor alterations of that is welcome to do so with permission before starting the debate as long as I think it will still leave me enough ground to debate on.

For this debate I will be arguing for the Affirmative. As such I will have first construct. For further details, and a link to the case description, read full description

There has never been two ideologies more ideologically opposed in political history. Prove me wrong.

This is intended to be an LD debate. I will be arguing the Negative. Affirmative has first construct and final rebuttal. For definitions and clarifications of terms see full details. Round 1- Neg(waive)/Aff(Case Construct) Round 2- Neg(Construct+Rebuttal)/Aff(rebuttal) Round 3-Neg(Second Rebuttal)/Aff(Second and final Rebuttal)

In my opinion, the Sith are actually good because the Sith code actually teaches you to follow your passions and natural instincts whereas the Jedi code conditions you to be an emotionless, numb robot.

No description has been provided

No description has been provided

Capitalism: an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit. Socialism: An economic system in which the means of production and exchange are owned in common by the community.

For this debate I will be arguing for the Affirmative. As such I will have first construct. For further details, and a link to the case description, read full description.

The more right wing you are, the more of a Nazi you are.

In this debate I will be basing my argument on an article written by a journalist who wishes to remain anonymous. The initial argument I will be using is not actually my own words, but the article in question.