All debates

There is a great misunderstanding of America's first Amendment compared to other nations' understanding of Freedom of speech. the rules of the debate are as follows Pro must establish Freedom of speech has no limits as well as justify why this should remain the case. Con has to either prove that freedom of speech is in fact limited or give a strong argument as to why it should be limited even if it is not the case at present.

No description has been provided

Burden of proof is shared. PRO argues that development of GMO technology is a good thing. CON argues that it is a bad thing.

Burden of proof is shared. PRO argues that getting a STEM degree is more useful to society than getting a Liberal Arts Degree. CON argues that getting a Liberal Arts degree is more useful to society than getting a STEM degree.

The burden of proof in this debate is shared. Pro will attempt to prove that the police do more good than harm, and Con will attempt to prove that the police do more harm than good.

Last debate to go

Troll debate so David can get his voting privileges.

The U.S. would probably destroy North Korea.

Plastic be free

I believe that Tv is a superior form of entertainment than books.

In this debate I want to discuss whether sanctions on Russia imposed by the West is justified from the viewpoint of economic and international relations. I am hoping to be a good debate.

I argue why it shouldn't, you argue why it should.

No description has been provided

No description has been provided

sedition law should not be there as it violate the the fundamental right