Instigator / Pro
14
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#850
Virtuoso gropes little boys and is sexually attracted to animals
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 9 votes and with 49 points ahead, the winner is...
TheRealNihilist
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
63
1650
rating
44
debates
77.27%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
Forfeited
You would have to ask Virtuoso but from the looks of his comment
here:
"As disgusting as Type1 is, bsh is correct. This is a troll debate and allowable under the COC."
He finds it disgusting. A person who does said would more than likely likes doing said thing. Since he finds it "disgusting" I doubt he does like doing said thing. I await for Type1 to provide evidence of Virtuoso like these said things.
Round 2
Forfeited
I await an argument.
Round 3
Forfeited
I await an argument.
I laughed way too hard at that RFD
lol dude when u told me this debate existed I litterally didn't think you were serious XD
Hope my RFD explains the debate well. It was hard to analyze all of those complex arguments.
Technically, it doesn't allow either. Mods just don't enforce violations of the COC which are made against mods.
So the COC allows members to attack moderators, but not other members?
This debate is not being allowed to stand because it's a troll debate per se. In order to ensure that users feel able to "speak truth to power" or to protest moderation, moderation does not enforce the entire conduct policy against those who insult members of the moderation team. This position also prevents moderation from having to deal with the headache of some user accusing us of silencing those who would criticize moderation. This policy ensures that users feel maximally free in their ability to talk about moderation.
Ultimately, you can insult myself and Virt however you want with no repercussions, period. We accepted that when we took the jobs we did. The *only* things you cannot do to myself and Virt are doxx us, hack us, genuinely attempt to impersonate us, or seriously threaten us. For other, less senior moderators, similar standards apply, except that (a) threats of any kind are prohibited and (b) particularly serious or unceasing personal attacks against them are prohibited.
That’s not a call out debate.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jeremybender/animals-that-are-sexy-and-know-it
Can't you do whatever you said you were going to about this?
https://www.debateart.com/debates/780
Isn't this a call-out debate?
As disgusting as Type1 is, bsh is correct. This is a troll debate and allowable under the COC.
>>Virtuoso gropes little boys and is sexually attracted to animals
What does moderation have to do with this?
You are moderating the site. You can't be groping little animals or into bestiality when you are on the site moderating.
Can this really be called criticism? I think it's more akin to slander and childish adhominem.
Because criticisms of moderation are almost entirely exempt from moderation.
Why isn't this taken down?
Yes I do.
Omar wants it.