Instigator / Pro
6
1500
rating
15
debates
43.33%
won
Topic
#6019

This statement is false.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
4
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
0
2

After 2 votes and with 8 points ahead, the winner is...

TheRizzler
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two hours
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
14
1500
rating
1
debates
100.0%
won
Description

This proposition is contradictory to itself.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Primarily, Pro loses this debate by forfeiture of 3 of 4 rounds, exceeding the 40% minimum at 75% of all rounds.
However, also by regiment, Pro argued botch for and against the Resolution, presenting an unresolved argument.
Con wins by default.

Neither participant offered source material for arguments.

Con demonstrated better conduct by participation in all rounds.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Two sentences against a fleshed-out argument about paradoxes. Foregone conclusion.