Instigator / Pro
1500
rating
3
debates
66.67%
won
Topic
#5901
There are more ways to know the truth than by physical evidence.
Status
Open challenge
The first member to accept the challenge becomes the contender.
Debate will be automatically deleted in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two weeks
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
Open position
?
rating
?
debates
?
won
Description
I will argue that physical evidence, namely that which science has limited itself to study, is not the only way to know something with certitude. I will be taking the pro side. Con must show that what I present, is somehow doubtable in what it says.
Round 1
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 2
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 3
Not published yet
Not published yet
I dont know what counts as physical evidence, and I would hate to accept the debate just to disagree on the definition.
Would "physical evidence" include things like abstract deductive reasoning?