Instigator / Pro
21
1515
rating
15
debates
86.67%
won
Topic
#5610

Drinking age in the US should be lowered from 21 to 18

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
9
0
Better sources
6
0
Better legibility
3
1
Better conduct
3
0

After 3 votes and with 20 points ahead, the winner is...

itsnotago
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
4,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1
1500
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Description

I (pro) argue that the drinking age in the US, meaning the age at which it becomes legal for a person to drink alcohol beverages should be lowered from 21 to 18. Con argues that the drinking age should remain the same.
Burden of proof is shared

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con forfeited last round.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con conceded.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

After reviewing the debate, my ruling is that Pro wins the argument vote because, although Con made a good point that lowering the drinking age can increase risks, Pro made excellent points stating that the law doesn't prevent teens from drinking underage to rebel against authority. Pro also backed up their statements with a source, whereas Con did not and expected to be "trusted" because they are supposedly from Europe where the drinking age is lower. Pro gets the source's vote by default. Additionally, I give Pro better conduct because Con forfeited in the last round.