Its a good idea to teach children that they can do whatever they want
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Pro starts his/her case by saying that just because children CAN do something, they should do it, to which con responds that if they do whatever they want and the people around them don't give them basic rules, they will all end up criminals so pro's argument doesn't really stand ( i believe that if pro made an exception for crimes it would have been a better argument). Pro then adds that adults have made many mistakes like polluting the Earth to the point where the world is doomed and it doesn't matter what the children do. While Con kinda drops this, i believe that argument can be countered.
Now let me explain the voting choices:
1) Argumentation: It's a tie because pro gave some arguments that didn't really stand but con's arguments were basically just rebuttals to pro's statements
2)No one used sources so its again a tie
3) I gave legibility to con because the statements were much more clear on his/her behalf and some of the examples Con gave to his/her arguments were kinda confusing, for example the argument about abuse and pedophilia (no child wants to be abused and the abuse won't stop if the child says "i don't want to be abused")
4) Conduct is a tie since both pro and con weren't rude or disrespectful
Morality is subjective. You are wrong again. You could have chosen truth.
"Morality is subjective, so you can do anything you want.”
That is stupid, here’s why:
First of all, morality is objective. It is the seven noahide laws.
Second of all, you think that it’s OK for anyone to do whatever they want, this is flawed because A) morality is objective, B) it states that you can’t do whatever you want, and C) Do you think Hitler’s actions were acceptable, or Stalin’s, or Mao’s, or as the left will say, Putin’s? Are their actions all acceptable just because they thought it was?
No.
Morality is subjective, so you can do anything you want.
I think that there have to be rules:
You can do whatever you want, as long as you are following the basic rules. (Don’t steal, Don’t kill, etc.)
That is how a constitutional republic, the likes of what AMERICA actually is, works.