Schools should not be mandatory
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 5 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
“Which participant had significantly better conduct?”
Tie. Neither of them were rude, so im considering it a tie.
“Which participant's arguments had significantly better legibility?”
Pro. Pro, while having less paragraphs, had little to none in all of it. Cons legibility did get better, but at the first couple rounds it could use some work.
“Which participant provided more convincing arguments?”
Con. Pro had around the same number of argument points, but Con expanded on his way more. Con also did more rebuttals.
“Which participant provided more reliable sources?”
Neither provided sources, so tie.
I strongly suspect that Pro just wrote out all of their rounds in advance, because they keep bringing up new points and don't respond to anything Con said. Not to mention they posted each of their rounds in just a few minutes.
Pro says schools are a waste of resources. Con responds that the benefits of learning and getting a job make it not a waste. Pro repeats what he said earlier, and Con elaborates on his response. Pro drops this.
Pro says that being forced to spend a decade of one's life in school outweighs the benefits. Conn responds that not going to school subjects someone to a "living hell" of slavery in low-paying work. Pro drops this.
Pro says that abuse happens in schools. Con responds that those teachers should be replaced but the school system should not be blamed for the abuse. Pro drops this.
Pro says that school is slavery and brainwashing because it is forced. Con responds that not everything forced is slavery and school allows people to have more labor options long-term. Con also says that teachers should be blamed for brainwashing, not the school system. Pro doesn't get a chance to respond because they waited until the last round to bring up these points.
For one debate, I even wrote 5 rounds with over 70,000 characters in advance.
But yeah, for most debates, I dont put in that much effort.
I just sometimed write 5 rounds in advance, maybe 2000 characters per round, its enough.
Most of the time I actually do engage with opponent's arguments, but it rarely pays off in terms of time I have to spend.
"I strongly suspect that Pro just wrote out all of their rounds in advance, because they keep bringing up new points and don't respond to anything Con said."
I'm pretty sure BK has literally said he does exactly that.
Brandolini's law