Instigator / Pro
3
1500
rating
3
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4403
The NBA should be payed more than the WNBA
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 2 votes and with 11 points ahead, the winner is...
Bella3sp
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
14
1524
rating
54
debates
74.07%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
2/3rds forfeit= full forfeit
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
66% forfeit by Pro. I'm not sure Con's argument is necessarily the obvious way of interpreting the resolution, but Pro never bothers to respond.
I thought I would comment this, there are exterior factore that the association can get paid.
Tickets, sponserships, merchandise, and through television. All of these are factors where "The NBA should be paid more than the WNBA" is a correct resolution. As a result, I just have to show why they need more revenue. Since they are lower in revnue, they need to sell (which in realty is paying the WNBA) more, so its possible. They should get paid more so they can arract more people.
I doubt pro thought of that though.
Pro is for NBA players should be payed more
I forgot to put the word players and I mean the players should be payed more
Wrong, you cannot pay an association, only members, just like you can pay the cellist of an orchestra but you can't just pay "the orchestra", you can pay the driver of the bus, not the bus.
Pro I believe
So is con or pro arguing that the NBA should be paid more?