Instigator / Pro
3
1500
rating
3
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4403
The NBA should be payed more than the WNBA
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 2 votes and with 11 points ahead, the winner is...
Bella3sp
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
14
1524
rating
53
debates
75.47%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
Forfeited
I don't have the current time to post my argument, I have like what, two debates I gotta finish in a day? I procrastinate a little to much..
I'll go ahead and give you a chance to make your argument in round two without any need for rebuttals.
Round 2
The NBA should be payed more than the WNBA because the WNBA has more than a 10 million dollar deficit and need the NBA to hold them up because them only make 40 million dollars per year.
Also the players are more athletic and talented.
For example the average WNBA vertical jump is around 10-15 inches which even a middle schooler can do while the NBA average vertical is 28 inches.
Finally If you argue they should be payed the same percentage as the NBA(50%)then on average each player would make 197000$ per year but they will not be ale to fund marketing, they will go into deeper into deficit and sponsors will stop sponsoring them doing more harm than good.
Well, I didn't realize my time limit.
Are we arguing that the company/association should be paid more? Someone in the comments had to spoil my idea...
Anyways, really, you can't pay them more. Sure, the players but not the company. You pay the players more than someone from another association, but not the company. Unless we are involving exterior factors?
All your arguments are irreverent because they are directed towards the players.
Round 3
Forfeited
Extend & end.
I said this in the comments as well:
If they did add exterior factors, it would be..
Tickets, sponserships, merchandise, and through television. All of these are factors where As a result, I just have to show why they need more revenue. I believe the WNBA should get paid more so they can arract more people because there are less views on the WNBA than the NBA.
I thought I would comment this, there are exterior factore that the association can get paid.
Tickets, sponserships, merchandise, and through television. All of these are factors where "The NBA should be paid more than the WNBA" is a correct resolution. As a result, I just have to show why they need more revenue. Since they are lower in revnue, they need to sell (which in realty is paying the WNBA) more, so its possible. They should get paid more so they can arract more people.
I doubt pro thought of that though.
Pro is for NBA players should be payed more
I forgot to put the word players and I mean the players should be payed more
Wrong, you cannot pay an association, only members, just like you can pay the cellist of an orchestra but you can't just pay "the orchestra", you can pay the driver of the bus, not the bus.
Pro I believe
So is con or pro arguing that the NBA should be paid more?