Instigator / Pro
0
1500
rating
2
debates
75.0%
won
Topic
#4364

The two genealogies for Jesus in the Bible cannot be reconciled.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
0
Better sources
0
0
Better legibility
0
0
Better conduct
0
0

After not so many votes...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1500
rating
10
debates
35.0%
won
Description

Matthew 1:1-16 and Luke 3:23-38 both purport to be the genealogy of Jesus. They have little in common besides saying that Joseph was Jesus’ father and that he descended from King David. For instance, Matthew says Jesus descended from David’s son Solomon and Luke says it was from David’s other son Nathan. There have been many attempts to reconcile these two genealogies over the centuries. I am not convinced that any of them succeeded. My opponent has agreed to try again.

I propose, subject to my opponent’s approval, to limit debate to five rounds, with the last three for rebuttals only. I will be working from the NIV and am open to using a different translation.

Round 1
Pro
#1
Here is why I think the two genealogies contradict each other.
1. Matthew says Jesus descended from David’s son Solomon;  Luke says he descended from David’s son Nathan.
2. Matt. says there were 26 generations from David to Jesus; Luke said it was 42.
3. Matt. says the father of Joseph was Jacob; Luke says it was Heli.
4. Matt. says Salathiel’s father was Jechonias; Luke says it was Neri.
5. Matt. says that Zorobabel’s son Abiud led to Jesus; Luke says it was his son Rhesa.


Con
#2
Forfeited
Round 2
Pro
#3
Extend.
Con
#4
Forfeited
Round 3
Pro
#5
Extend.
Con
#6
Forfeited
Round 4
Pro
#7
Extend.
Con
#8
Forfeited
Round 5
Pro
#9
Extend.
Con
#10
Forfeited