All debates

Há um ato de racismo quando um negro ofende outro negro?

See full description for definitions

Use any economic indicator you want. I won't provide a metric for "negative economic effect" because I leave that up to the debater. You can choose your own metric, but you will need to defend why it is a better metric than the ones I will use. Metrics should be used up to the date when this debate is accepted. When I say "so far" I mean up to the time when someone accepts this challenge.

Pro argues for the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura, Con argues against the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura.

No description has been provided

if u want adjustments, dm me. (っ◔◡◔)っ 🍔

CON CLAIMS: No god is a god with omnipotence.

Can both be true, or do they clash

Before the 1964 Civil Rights Act it was perfectly legal and constitutional for a state to make a preferential established religion and enforce it down into its municipalites and state jurisdiction. The idea of separation of church and state is so the government doesn't influence the church (ie History of Catholic Church) but instead church influences the state. The Federal Law would leave religious matters up to the state and stay out of religious affairs altogether.

Highly respected religious and non-religious prove ur believes r authentic and logical by ur grace

No description has been provided

No description has been provided

Is water wet?

I am con. Is time travel scientifically possible?

I respect trans and love them like any other human would but they arnt their true gender.