Book of enoch
- We should note that the Book of the Watchers (including Chapter 18) is estimated to have been written about 300-200 BCE. [2]
- However, we have no evidence that humans ever visited Antarctica before the 19th century. [3]
The book is non cannon.it is suppose to take place before the flood so there would be no evidence.
They have discovered pyramids in Antarctica.So people must have been there before 19 century
ON argues that "a place that burns day and night " must indicate the unsetting sun of antarctic summer.
- Why
wouldn't Enoch simply describe an icy land where the sun does not set?
Does "burning day and night" really seem like an apt metaphor for the
midnight sun effect?
- A likelier interpretation seems to a
description of the underworld through which Enoch must pass to visit
Sheol. In many mythologies, a burning underworld indicates old-world
references of to magma
no in the book he is teleported all over the place.I believe some parts of the book is true.This book has nothing to do with Sheol.I listened to it on audio book
Astronomers confirm the accuracy of some of the space knowledge in the book of Enoch
ave discovered something
very interesting in the Book of Enoch. In the
18th chapter, he is describing a journey with
the angels, where they are flying in an angelic "spaceship"
southwards on the earth, and coming to a place where there are
pillars of heavenly fire.
To me, this sounds like they were flying over Africa (from
the Middle East), and coming to the South Pole, and watching the
Southern Lights.
Enoch describes how he is passing several mountains, which
quite well fits in with the mountains in east and south Africa
1. He passes over where the "waters
collect", which obviously is where the oceans gather south
of Africa
2. Then when they come to
the place further south, he sees a deep rift, or abyss
3, which would suggest that Antarctica at
that time was free from ice. And we know that there are ancient
maps that seem to depict Antarctica as an ice-free landmass
4.
Now, over this abyss, where the heavenly fire goes up and down
like immense pillars, there are seven stars
5.
This is of course not stars here on earth, but stars hovering
over the South Pole horizon. A well known formation of seven stars
is the
Pleiades. Were the stars Enoch saw the Pleiades?
Several things seems to confirm this. Firstly, the angels tells
him that certain fallen angels were to be bound to those stars,
because of their mingling with women on earth
There is proof that the book of enoch was written 700 years before the flood.When Enoch lived.Pleiades can not be seen in the southpole.Where Enoch said he saw it.But when they checked the alignment of the stars when he lived 3000BC it turns out you could see Pleiades in the southpole
When he checked the position of the stars today you could not see Pleiades where enoch claimed to see it in southpole.
When they checked the position of the stars in the time of Jesus you could not see pleiades stars where enoch claimed to see it in southpole
When they checked the position of of the stars flood era. to see if you could see Pleiades when the flood was suppose to happen.You could not see them.
But when they checked the position of the stars 3000 bc.When enoch was suppose to live in the book 700 years before flood.You could see Pleiades where enoch claimed to have seen him at the same time he lived.This prove the book was written 3000 bc and it was possible for enoch to see pleiades in the south pole.It is only possible 3000 bc. which is when it is speculated he lived.Plus this prove that it is possible for him to see pleiades
So, with my last hope, and with a great feeling of exitement,
I put the date to 3000 BC, and started to rotate the scene. And
there they were! The Pleiades could be seen at that
time, just above the horizon, at the South Pole! Wow! and Hallelujah!
note only in 3000 Bc could you see Pleiades in the south pole.Which is 700 years before the flood.Which puts the book at the time of Enoch.So it is possible for Enoch to see Pleiades in the south pole.But only in 3000 BC.If he had looked today it would be impossible to see Pleiades in the south pole.In the day of Jesus it would be impossible to see peliadias at the south-pole.
Or was this journey real, and written down by someone who really
lived five thousand years ago? And who obviously must have known,
or seen, Africa and the Southern Ocean from above, and then the
South Pole, with its pillars of light? How could anyone just guess
all that, or put it together in a story, when all of it is perfectly
accurate - geographically, astronomically, and an exactly the
right timeframe?
How could Enoch describe all the astronomy accurately if it did not happen.
this is a stunning evidence that the Book of Enoch
really is written before the Great Flood, and that he really did
travel with the angels of God in some sort of a flying vehicle,
around the world.
The same passages indicate mountains of precious gems, which modern geology refutes.
- For
example, we now know that pearls are formed by biological processes,
not geological. No entirely pearl geological formation could possibly
form under any circumstances.
- If there really was any good
evidence that an entire throne of sapphire topped one of the mountains
of Antarctica, many expeditions and resources would be dispatched to
claim the object. PRO is not aware of any such efforts.
This is suppose to take at the beginning of time.Biological process change.I am pretty you are talking about somewhere else he had traveled. The guy was taken all over the place.He was taken to space and shown the stars.He was taken to heaven.It has been a while since audio book.I am pretty sure he was visiting heaven at that point do not quote me
John kerry
I am arguing that john Kerry was having demonic encounter.
CON argues that Kerry "probably" believes he met with aliens.
no i am saying he met with demons.
Recap of story. on election day. John Kerry goes to Antarctica.It is believe he met with demons but unlikely.most likely demons for many ancient text say demons were imprisoned there.When he leaves Antarctica where his plane lands returning home an earthquake happens most likely judgment from god.The earthquake makes this encounter an demon encounter not an alien encounter.It was gods judgment
Hypnotist
During ww2 Hitler visits Antarctica.This is strange since it is believed demons were trapped there.He is said to have visited a hypnotist.This would prove that Hitler had a demonic encounter.But the documents on Hitler being hypnotized was covered up.Plus the hypnotist committed suicide saying he created the most evil man in history.The hypnotist ties Hitler to being demon possessed and or under a spell.Which puts the Antarctica visits to being demon encounters not aliens
if the hypnotist story was not true why did they destroy all of the documents.The hypnotist story turns this into an demon encounter instead of an alien one.
There was evidence.It was destroyed.This is false. If not true why hide it.
call that a significant non-sequitur. Lack of evidence is not necessarily proof of demons.
there are still the statements from the hypnotist.Why would the goverment destroy the documents if what he said was not true.
Hillary clinton
Hillary Clinton believes demons are aliens.They are probably demons.Hillary Clinton lackey was invited to Satanic ritual.Spirit cooking
This ties Hillary to demonic activity
Bill clinton belonged to a satanic cult known as demolay
Hillary Clinton used to attend a "witch's church" in Los Angeles during Bill's presidency.
proof of demon activity instead of aliens
more proof.FBI gave hillary clinton trouble over satanic pedophile stuff
this points to demonic activity not alien activity.
Jeffery Epstein plane fly's to Antarctica while he is in prison
This just makes it stranger.A plane with Jeffery Epstein tail number ended up in Antarctica while he was in prison.The odds of a plane having the same number is like lottery odds so it probably no accident.But the plane seemed to have teleported as the plane on sonar was in the middle of Antarctica then teleported to middle of America.
It is speculated that
JIM STONE speculates whether Epstein's plane that was identified by flight tracker was modified to make the trip to Antarctica
What is going on.This case does not seem to fit demons specifically.But what is going on
Conclusion.
Book of enoch has evidence THat it dates back to 3000bc.700 years before great flood.Because pleadiias as only viewable during that time in the south pole.This is proof that he saw these stars in the southpole.Note it is impossible to see these stars in the south pole today or in the time of Jesus and only possible preflood era.Which proves this book was written by noah 7 times great grandfather.Hitler was hypnotized by demons.He went to Antarctica.John Kerry went to Antarctica on election day.But when he got back an earthquake shook the town he was in.I believe this is a warning from god.Which means he was probably talking to demons.THen epsteins plane tail number detected on sonar in Antarctica while he was suppose to be in prison.WTF. There is enough evidence to conclude.There is demon stuff going on in antartica
Right. Don't you know that the U.S. government discovered an Ancient chair that fires space torpedoes out of Antarctica?
shout out to anyone who gets the reference.
I tried to nail it down a couple of times but never really did. I started out working against CON's claim: ""Many conspiracy theorist believe that our politicians are lizard People. The real answer is not aliens but demons." It is not until R3 that CON makes it clear that he claims that Kerry consorts with demons, but is not himself a demon. The title is about aliens but CON had no actual claims regarding aliens. Mostly it just feels like PRO wanted to keep tossing out new outrageous and unsupportable claims and only lightly engaged or countered any rebuttal.
Before I try to read this, would one (or both) of you clarify the resolution? Like is pro arguing they exist and con that they don't, or is pro arguing morally in favor of said demons and con arguing morally against them...
this debate!
You both keep referring to con as pro and vice versa...