Default banner

#freedom of speech

This tag does not yet have a description

Total debates: 5

Random's avatar
VS
SocraticGregarian96's avatar

Pro believes that free speech does include hate speech while con doesn't. Also just because pro believes that free speech does include hate speech, doesn't mean they support it. This is not a debate about whether hate speech is ok or not, it is about whether free speech INCLUDES hate speech or not.

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
10/10 15 1
AudraE's avatar
VS
iwannabeaboat's avatar

Engage your inner lawyer :) Social media companies are not currently responsible for their user's posts. Should they be?

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
6/6 8 0
ava_02's avatar
VS
Best.Korea's avatar

No description has been provided

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
6/6 0 0
Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
8/8 15 2
Americandebater24's avatar
VS
DeeezNutz's avatar

There is a great misunderstanding of America's first Amendment compared to other nations' understanding of Freedom of speech. the rules of the debate are as follows Pro must establish Freedom of speech has no limits as well as justify why this should remain the case. Con has to either prove that freedom of speech is in fact limited or give a strong argument as to why it should be limited even if it is not the case at present.

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
5/8 2 2