Total topics: 3
Standard Model: As Derived from Synergetics Abstract GreatCircles
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Five-fold icosa{20}hedron and its bilateral{ left and right-skew set } of 31 primarygreat tori { circles } ----6, 10 and 15--- associated with all observed bosonic forces
EMRadiation is a particle. R P Feynman has elaborated uponin his book QED. Old news.
UnfortunatelyRPFeynman did not have the foresight andhis brash and large ego allowed him to make the following comment when theperson who first proposed the meson with the math...."in a pigseye".... and Feynman had to eat his words.
I have my own version of the Standard Model involving mynumerical based tori overlapping andinterfering that stem from;
Four-fold cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron{ Vector Equilirbrium } and its 25 primary 3D tori { 2D-circles }--representativeof static root basis for dynamicmotions{ fuzzy cloud } we humans do and may never observe and disscectinstrumentally--- associated directly with all femionic matter with oneexception listed below of the 2-quark mesons{ bosons }
...includes 1, 2 and 3-fold.......1} Quarks { 3 as proton, neutron ergo hadrons } = 6 great tori { circles } of quadra-valenced( 12 } tetrahedron i.e sets of 2-great tori{ circles }
....as associatedsubcatagory of cubo-octahedrons set of 3, 4, 6 and 12 great circles{ tori }....2} Mesons{ bosonic particles { 2-quark weirdos }} = 4 greattori{ circles } of that define the four equatoralgreat hexagonal planes of thecubo-octahedron
3} Electrons = 3 great circle{ tori } of the doubled-valenced{ 6 } octahedron as derivedfrom contracted cubo-octahedron
....as associatedsubcatagory of cubo-octahedrons set of 3, 4, 6 and 12 great tori { circles}....4} Neutrinos = 12 great toris { circles } cubo-octahedron
....as associatedsubcatagory of cubo-octahedrons set of 3, 4, 6 and 12 great tori { circles}....~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Five-fold icosa{20}hedron and its bilateral{ left and right-skew set } of 31 primarygreat tori { circles } ----6, 10 and 15--- associated with all observed bosonic forces
5} Strong sub-nuclear force{ gluons } = 6 great tori {circles },
6} EMRadiations{ photons } = 10 great tori { circles },
7} Weak EM force { W+, W- and Zo } = 15 great tori{circles}.
Gravity ( ) and DarkEnergy )( are geodesically inherent to these above tori as the positive andnegative geodesically curved shape of the numerically inverted torus concepts I’vepresented.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Personal
Does anybody else think that it will be possible for us to gain an indefinite lifespan in our lifetime? I am doing this debate on it https://www.debateart.com/debates/1719/radical-life-extension-is-possible-in-our-lifetime
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Science and Nature
In this debate I will be arguing that radical life extension is good for society. https://www.debateart.com/debates/1723/radical-life-extension-technologies-would-be-on-balance-beneficial-to-society
It is my opinion that arguments against it, are really no different than just rationalizations because people have accepted death as inevitable, and now cope with death by pretending like it is a good thing. Copes occur everyday and for a variety of reasons. Arguing against radical life extension would be similar to arguing against something like childhood leukemia, which a cure for would also increase some people's life expectancy.
Some argue that death is good because only the rich would benefit at first, but this is equally as silly and for similar reasons. It would be similar to discouraging the invention of a home based PC, just because it is only available to a select few to begin with. Or saying we should not drink fresh safe water, just because there are portions of the world, without access to it.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Technology