Total posts: 191
Posted in:
gonna read & reply in a flurry
is town bloc VTNLing or gunning for someone
is town bloc VTNLing or gunning for someone
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
#598
I'm on page 12, just woke up, reading v soon please tell me how many hours I have, bit sleep delirious
Created:
Posted in:
wait objectivity was mod killed WTF LMAO
k eating fast
Created:
Posted in:
yeah don't end this dp before I finish reading and contributing. gonna eat food rn, then continue from #274.
objectivity + oromagi + zaradi + ragnar + lunatic (can we stop calling him tuf pls 🥺🥺) are the people whose motivations are most opaque to be rn
this site on my phone feels a bit claustrophobic, but I'm hoping I will be able to focus enough to build a working conception of their respective personalities / postures to the game
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Zaradi
I clicked "like" on #273 before I saw #274 lol. I'm not that incisive a scum hunter, but I appreciate this line of thinking and am amenable to following it.
I haven't read past this point yet, as of my making this post.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
#192
what makes you so sure? not familiar enough with her scum meta
Created:
Posted in:
my hierarchicalized reads
sui
coal [yy]
lunatic [tuf]
…
danielle
zaradi
objectivity
oromagi
airmax
…
ragnar
loose list
haven't devoted much focused consideration on Oro or especially Objectivity yet
my zaradi read is also still percolating
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
In addition to what I have already said, TUF and Zaradi aren't even close to on the same page, and it doesn't look forced.They cannot both be scum.
okay, reread more carefully, and I am on board with this. I'm not sure why I originally had specifically disagreed / read that interaction differently.
#188
thank you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
#185
yeah well besides generally desiring a healthily well-rounded dose of activity from all in DP1 then Ragnar specifically because he's only posted fluff of the sort that indicates either not really giving a shit, scum, or idiocy :)
#187
thanks.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lucky
how did you link posts by post numbers in #128
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
#181
it 100% is contrived
I agree with coal that we should be generating a lot of baseline for DP1 so we can refer back to it later
I'm pressuring him to engage, give reads, expose his thought process in his interaction styles
as such, VTL Ragnar for activity
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@coal
#53 coal
lol I did not actually read Lucky's OP (or the role list until after your post)I was tempted to not even read my role PM...
#54 lunatic
I know. And I am glad you admit it, so we don't have to get caught up in that. Especially because I personally don't see it as a scum tell like Zaradi.
what do you mean, then, here:
#154 lunatic
Coal I am switching constantly between a scum read and a town read. Specifically I am trying to discern his personality from his game-play strategy.[…]Where I town read him is because he admitted to lying about not reading the OP. If he really is town, and not wanting to get caught up in a pointless argument that would just delay town this was the best course of action.
but he literally didn't? he "admitted" the opposite?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
#175
can you say more about your read on Zaradi?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
#169
I also favor pressure on Ragnar
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
#168
I fully agree with this, and we should not finish the phase until a bit into the 4th day. (we shouldn't get greedy tho because inevitably we'll come to an impasse we can't resolve in time and get a stupid no lynch
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
Explain why you voted for Zaradi but he wasn't your strongest scum read.
I find plausible the explanation Oro gave—Zaradi WAS lowest on his scum list, if it's true that after posting the list but before voting, he realized I HAD posted, and thus shouldn't be on the bottom of his activity list.
though… that would imply that he didn't realize Zaradi was more active than Danielle… which is a weird thing
Do you buy his argument that he was setting up the VTL of Oro before I VTL'd Oro? Please explain.Please elaborate more on your thoughts on Oro.
#87 is sus af, so, no: I don't. it seems like a weird post-hoc explanation. it makes sense as a line of inquiry, because Oro's actions are a bit confusing (makes sense since Oro claims to have been confused) but as a contrived line of questioning, no, it doesn't make sense as I'm reading it
please explain your reasoning for #90 / what it means—why would the chronology of Oro's reads matter to Zaradi's pressure play?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
I wasn't pressuring you due to inactivity, but out of love 🥰
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
I don't know how to nest quotations
Why do you think that?
because I'm below people who haven't posted; oro wouldn't scum read me that hard without calling me scum; and I interpreted what he said as having just grabbed the names and threw them in. I realized later what he meant was that he put my name there but only realized I had posted later
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Objectivity
@Barney
(plus as Coal confessed, he hasn't bothered checking his PMs to know if he's town or otherwise who his scum partner is).
I don't think Objectivity & Ragnar would be both scum AND both misread coal's post wherein he specifically admitted that he was only TEMPTED to read his role pm. I don't see cooperating on such a useless lie would benefit scum, and I don't see BOTH players misreading so carelessly as scum, though that's more on the presumption of skill than personal familiarity.
Ragnar seems more genuine in his oblivion, and thus more town, between the two.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
What do you think about Oro's list of "reads"? What do you think about Zaradi's jumping on the bus to VTL oro after that list of "reads"?
I townread zaradi's behavior but do not townread the follow-up VTL.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
It's weird that Oro "reads" Zradi on the scale that he does.
it's not a hierarchicalized list
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
@oromagi
Sui should post his reads on all players.
I will update reads as I go
so follow, sick bus
what?? who & why?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
TUF and Zaradi cannot both be scum based on their interactions.
how so? specifically would disagree.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
making these "as of the post to which I am replying" (haven't read any further atm)
I would also like Sui's reads.
• I townread coal (with caution, as I respect your play)
• Lunatic null-vibing-town
• Zaradi null
• I don't consider inactivity AI for anyone here (yet)
Created:
Posted in:
Lunatic — TUF, ya?
coal — YYW, ya?
Objectivity — Objectivity, ya?
Zaradi — Zaradi, ya?
Ragnar — …Ragnar?
oromagi — …oromagi?
anyone have any other accounts on ddo?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Lol okay we will pretend you actually read the opening post for the sake of argument. I don't think anyone on this player list is dumb enough to fall for that bait.
I mean I typed out "I win with town" originally as sop for what I think is for lie detectors before remembering there isn't possibly any
so I wouldn't put it past EVERYONE…
Created:
Posted in:
oshit editing is a modkill. You should edit your OP.......
Created:
Posted in:
k so are we VTNLing today? for the record? I forget how to figure odds / am lazy. I will be able to engage actively / at length tonight.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
Please implement a living document with "Completed", "For Consideration", "Will Not Implement", "May Implement (Low Priority)", "Will Implement (Low Priority)", "Will Implement (High Priority)" &c so that those of us coming to this thread late (i.e., me) don't have to sift through dozens of pages to see if our suggestions are already made.
Also if you do this, PLEASE do not discount "Completed" category. Crucial.
Where is the site on Unicode support?
❦
Gooood.
Created:
Posted in:
darn. all right I want in next
or can you write me in at some point in the future?
never played DnD before...
or can you write me in at some point in the future?
never played DnD before...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Buddamoose
Yo can we not have this archaic method for signups lol. Let's take this opportunity to update the method, or at least the rules. e.g., adding decay to sign-ups / hopper so that you can't just hold position forever &c.
Created: