You can side with him no problem, but it does not change core problems of the field, everything he provides lacks technicality , it is fine people can build their imaginary castles, but they are effectively straying away from tech and its limitations.
Seldiora half reads my every debate and casts a vote, I have no problem losing but it should be on merit.
Resolution by PRO: Limit assualt rifles and other rifles to only gun ranges, delay the acquisition period for all firearms, and ban secondary firearm sales. Limit firearms purchase and sale to only stores.
These lines were used by me in R4 , I dont know how is my resolution ambiguous as claimed by the voter. He does not even cover most of the points, main arguments regarding police, budget
". His implication of criminals rarely actually using guns helps solidify his case in the end," This is one more section of his vote, I quoted Department of Justice stating 931000 violent crimes takes place against only 83000 defensive gun uses.
I dont know how any of my statements invite ambiguity.
I have other work more important than this debate website, my university for example, I dont care if I lose or win , it does not affect me in real life does it?
Sorry if you felt I was being aggressive! I usually use a formal tone so it is hard to understand what is the overall tone , just from written text. "This was supposed to be fun; remember? Perhaps Con has forgotten how to be a 10-year-old kid. I’m likely twice, maybe three times Con’s age. I have not forgotten."
I did not mean to be disrespectful at any moment in the debate. If you felt that way I am sorry.
I have already cited Department of Physics, UC Berkeley ,calling forth the top astrologers in US and found their prediction close to chance(natural random probability of an event happening to be true).
can you vote on this debate , i dont want another debate of mine to be counted as a draw !
https://www.debateart.com/debates/2172/astrology-accurately-explains-many-things
No worries! I have seen your conduct, I am not easily influenced. I have to agree with you , you should have the right to atleast defend yourself. I don't know what observation he is talking about, I follow most of the debates here since I joined. I have not seen any instance that substanstiates his allegation.
RationalMadman's allegation is baseless, my first debate was with oromagi. I too failed to upload on time, he let me restart the debate and asks mods to delete the previous one. Dont hurl allegations RM.
This debate is very confusing I am done reading R3 of both sides mostly, PRO and CON seem to be boxing in two different arenas, I read the description, I thought okay this is a debate on Christianity, CON is bringing in other religions and this has caused a huge condusion. There is no boundary, is it or is it not a debate soley about Christianity, how will a voter decide. Frankly both PRO and CON should have decided it, I am done reading R3 and my head is hurting, what is going on?
If you want to really debate on animal rights and the topic, remove the United states and set the debate from a world perspective, challenge me : "Zoos should not be abolished completely" I will accept. Lets cross swords, what say you ?
It is a long read, I will try to vote here, since it is interesting.
who won the debate tournament? I cannot find a link. Also long time no see XD
I won't put forth any absurd logics .
bump
sorry for the forfiet IST timeline is very different in India, If I fall asleep early I often get a forfeit.
You can side with him no problem, but it does not change core problems of the field, everything he provides lacks technicality , it is fine people can build their imaginary castles, but they are effectively straying away from tech and its limitations.
Business part of it, I can attach research papers but they are not open access
This is literally my field
This is a easy win.
Seldiora half reads my every debate and casts a vote, I have no problem losing but it should be on merit.
Resolution by PRO: Limit assualt rifles and other rifles to only gun ranges, delay the acquisition period for all firearms, and ban secondary firearm sales. Limit firearms purchase and sale to only stores.
These lines were used by me in R4 , I dont know how is my resolution ambiguous as claimed by the voter. He does not even cover most of the points, main arguments regarding police, budget
". His implication of criminals rarely actually using guns helps solidify his case in the end," This is one more section of his vote, I quoted Department of Justice stating 931000 violent crimes takes place against only 83000 defensive gun uses.
I dont know how any of my statements invite ambiguity.
PRO can make bridges upon bridges of arguments , I will only use Probability theorams to make a convincing case.
bump
Are you already a graduate holding 2 degrees or in process , your resume has 2 degrees written in it.
I have other work more important than this debate website, my university for example, I dont care if I lose or win , it does not affect me in real life does it?
Sorry if you felt I was being aggressive! I usually use a formal tone so it is hard to understand what is the overall tone , just from written text. "This was supposed to be fun; remember? Perhaps Con has forgotten how to be a 10-year-old kid. I’m likely twice, maybe three times Con’s age. I have not forgotten."
I did not mean to be disrespectful at any moment in the debate. If you felt that way I am sorry.
cool !
thanks.
Ragnar is not voting so..........
I have already cited Department of Physics, UC Berkeley ,calling forth the top astrologers in US and found their prediction close to chance(natural random probability of an event happening to be true).
no need to crib about it RM
I just wanted to know if i bother to read all the arguments and I find PRO more convincing will mod remove my vote , that is all.
can you vote on this debate , i dont want another debate of mine to be counted as a draw !
https://www.debateart.com/debates/2172/astrology-accurately-explains-many-things
vote>?
will you guys vote?
should voters consider this as Full forfeit? or read arguments?
bump
bump
bump
bump
I will vote before the deadline.
vote please!
bump
vote please.
vote please!
bump
No worries! I have seen your conduct, I am not easily influenced. I have to agree with you , you should have the right to atleast defend yourself. I don't know what observation he is talking about, I follow most of the debates here since I joined. I have not seen any instance that substanstiates his allegation.
I dont feel threatened though!
Do better than your gasoline debate.
Who in the world can defend this? almost impossible.
RationalMadman's allegation is baseless, my first debate was with oromagi. I too failed to upload on time, he let me restart the debate and asks mods to delete the previous one. Dont hurl allegations RM.
Jaw dropping argument! tides have turned.
huge confusion*
This debate is very confusing I am done reading R3 of both sides mostly, PRO and CON seem to be boxing in two different arenas, I read the description, I thought okay this is a debate on Christianity, CON is bringing in other religions and this has caused a huge condusion. There is no boundary, is it or is it not a debate soley about Christianity, how will a voter decide. Frankly both PRO and CON should have decided it, I am done reading R3 and my head is hurting, what is going on?
mods please comment on how to vote on this!
10k is fine
What's with the 30k character limit? People got to vote as well, think about them please,drop the limit.
Drop boruto, I will accept ( original 220+500 episodes only)
Thank you so much.
Care to vote? Do give a read if you all have time.
If you want to really debate on animal rights and the topic, remove the United states and set the debate from a world perspective, challenge me : "Zoos should not be abolished completely" I will accept. Lets cross swords, what say you ?
well!have fun ,maybe some other time.