Total votes: 6
Pro wins by Con's forfeits.
Terrible from Pro.
Absolutely terrible. Pro had the worst grammar I have ever come across, and both really never proved anything. Horrible, but had to give it to Con because he at least tried to put a mini argument together.
Forfeit. Wish we had less of these.
First time voting!
Both Pro and Con made some good points, introduced quotes from the Quran as well as behaving in the correct manner.
Pro concedes that there are some good things about Islam but the topic is Islam is not a good religion so a bit contradictory.
Pro gives violent verses as a defence to how Islam promotes violence but fails to give context to many verses which Con mentions in the second round.
Pro also questions the marriage of Prophet Muhammed and Aisha and Con rebuttles unsuccessfully by stating she was 19. The majority of Muslim/scholars agree that Aisha was 9 years old , not 19. Con wins this point.
Pro gives no sources to his claims whereas Con does thus making him more reliable.
In my opinion, the debate was too short to be a debate as many points were not explored well enough however Con wins for me due to his rebuttle on how the verses were out of context and also gives reference to charity/zakat as a means to do good. As the title is Islam is not a good religion, and charity is good, it is questionable.