Pro brings up a debate with the motion "Does God Exist?", then states multiple time that Hitchens failed to prove "God Does Not Exist." Any high school debate team would have easily pointed out that they're attempting to shift the burden of proof in bad faith. Also, typo corrections? Are they 12 years old?
Con didn't make good use of their time and clearly lost interest, so I guess bad job all around.
Pro brings up a debate with the motion "Does God Exist?", then states multiple time that Hitchens failed to prove "God Does Not Exist." Any high school debate team would have easily pointed out that they're attempting to shift the burden of proof in bad faith. Also, typo corrections? Are they 12 years old?
Con didn't make good use of their time and clearly lost interest, so I guess bad job all around.