itsnotago

migrants are people

Frick, i would have taken the challenge

change gender as in socially or as in medically and physically?

Maybe in america it's easier to get good grades. If you make one mistake on an average highschool european test, you will lose 15%

Don't take this debate, it may seem easy but
Brandolini's law: “The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.”

I disagree with this vote because you say i provide facts that are not in favor of Trump but this is bcuz i wanted to focus on policies which i proved whose was better (Trump). This is the format i wanted to follow but con just started throwing cheap shots without a format, mentioning no format, so i rebuttled and debunked some without breaking character limit while i also threw some of my own directed at Biden. You have to understand that there are things like inflation or federal debt that every single president has increased bcuz it is impossible to decrease. I use these two examples of cheap shots that con threw because con clearly said trump increased inflation and federal tax but it was in fact the other way around completely. As far as Con goes, you say you liked their "pathos" better than mine while they didn't mention any policies bcuz they knew they had nothing to say to save themselves and most of the cheap shots they threw without format were debunked

For all

And i would also rly appreciate if we kept characters low, preferably under 5-6k

I'll just stop responding. There's obviously a morality barrier that we can't overcome. Good luck on the debate

That's the whole point. Some people are selfish and immoral whereas others aren't. It's all subjective because you're right many people are assholes and don't even love their children

You don't have any children or family so you wouldn't know how selfish it is. How would a parent like to see their kid's assets being seized and their life ruined just because you didn't own up to your debt and pay it off. You would die a very immoral death, plus there's the downside of your life being shortened by many years, where you could have spent time paying your debt back and enjoy moments of life, spend time with your close ones. At least then, you would die knowing you did something good

You are punishing yourself but nothing changes because the debt is still there and passed onto the children. Besides, you can spend time alive, with your children and your friends, which you wouldn't know and it wouldn't be worth considering because you have none of the two. CHECKMATE TAOIST

All decency is lost since you by choice leave the debt and kill yourself, thereby encouraging suicide for other people whenever they face difficulty. You die as a person of no morals and if ur happy for that good for you

That's the difference. You're choosing to create debt for the world and making it a worse place to live by killing yourself whereas these people couldn't pay the debt because it was too high for them to afford. Of course, if you can't pay debt back, you can't risk it but when there's a debt crisis like the one right now, banks won't hesitate to seize every single asset of those who owe debt.

That's not how the way the world works. If every piece of debt was passed on to the next generation, it would never be paid back. If u can't pay back debt and your family ends up with it, the government will seize your assets in order to make up for it. And i'm sure no person with children would want that to happen to their children

Ur kids pay it when you die

I didn't see that you were con, i thought you were pro. Nevertheless, i will debate you

Oh believe me it's true and she has made many similar mistakes as a prosecutor. Democrats main argument is that Trump is a felon and well if kamala isn't a felon i don't know who is. Democrat has become a buzzword while Trump is constantly called a fascist and a white supremacist.
Don't get me wrong Kamala will probably win and if she doesn't it will be close but i'm not quite sure if she's the most eligible. All i have seen her do is dance and laugh at herself, no politics whatsoever

My question is who almost condemned an innocent man to death and then concealed evidence as a prosecutor?

i propose 18 because its 18 in oher continents and those twoyears wouldn't rly make a difference

yeah honestly if we had 10 year olds on vodka the world would be a better place

You placed a vote which i totally respect but i don't really respect the comments you made. You said my assertion is impractical which you didn't prove and then you tried to add an argument in favor of pro which i will rebuttle but the voting section of debates isn't really the place to create a debate, it's more to indicate who did a better job rather than give your opinion.
You said they won't be able to reach the perp before the perp does the shooting but that is false. Schools are smart enough to have the guards scattered across premises instead of have them standing still at the entrance which is the only scenario i can imagine in which the perp actually gets the chance to perform the shooting. It will be impossible if the guards are scattered since they will be patrolling every single corner. I didn't actually mention this in the debate so it is technically inadmissible but you brought up this subject, not con. The guards won't act like security ones since they have guns which security guards don't possess and as i said will not hesitate to pull the trigger. A school shooter is a major criminal and will be treated as one. If the guards spots the shooter shooting at a bunch of kids, he will not wait for the police to arrive, he will get the job done even if that involves shooting at the perp and injuring them.
However as i stated, the perp won't get the chance to enter the premises since there are multiple guards scattered across the school, patrolling every single corner looking for suspicious students.
I also stated that the guards will sometimes frisk the students and you can't possibly hide an AR from the person frisking you

source for argument 1
https://abortion.procon.org/

Ill make sure to modify the description

Yea and also about covid, i heard and experienced myself certain side effects from the vaccine so i might have to modify the description. I don't get a lot into political labels, i just care about people being safe, it's not a matter of control, it's solely about safety

That's not half bad because porn has actually destroyed the meaning of intercourse. People are supposed to have sex, not watch it. Men search for happiness through porn, yet only if they experience it will they ever be happy and complete. Porn is an addiction like many others

Yea i agree to some extent, but these cigs have proven to be able to kill anyone as i explained in my healthrisks arguments so they're basically murder weapons even though the murder is never intended unless the vendor is some twisted fuck. Murder= some type of imprisonment or they either have to pay a giant bail. If it's their first offence, community service works fine i guess

They technically are banned like it’s not ethical to sell nicotine to non adults but the vendors make it so easy for the children to get their hands on them. Both should be punished, it’s not only the vendors fault

I wanna debate the danger of smoking them and then explain why this danger requires a ban. I will propose a ban and opposition can dispute it

Ok then, billionaires who work and produce lots of carbon

"Most children can vote"-> They wouldn't do as good a job as adults. They would vote the wrong people and for the wrong causes.
"Child's body belongs to a child.So who is the only one who gets to vote about what child does with own body?The child"-> That is not true, let me explain. A child has its own body, yet parents still have the right to vaccinate it. Why? So that the child is protected from diseases which is a good enough reason and its the same thing with voting. Parents and adults vote because they are supposedly more educated and can be trusted to vote the correct things that benefit them as well as their children
"Is child your property? No."-> Until the child can be legally emancipated, it is to an extent. The child is registered under the parents's name, parents pay taxes for them, just like you would do for a house you own. They are obviously not material objects and are not associated with money, yet the parents somewhat own it. If a child murdered someone, the parents would be to blame, not the children themselves(i'm talking about pre-teens mostly), just like if a house caught on fire, the person who owned it would be notified in order to restore it.
"However, with non-aggression principle, you get to educate people so they dont make a mistake, but also they grow intellectually"-> You take precautions so that people don't make mistakes. The precaution in this case is educating the child before it becomes an adult and therefore a member of society, with which he beomes fully responsible of his actions and has to fulfill certain obligations. Only until they reach adulthood, will they be educated enough to prevent mistakes. Intellect prevents mistakes from happening, you gain intellect through making mistakes but certain mistakes are major and should be avoided. Adults are provided education and the necessary tools to prevent mistakes. Children are not provided that and even if they are, lack of maturity wouldn't allow them to understand

Imagine if everyone had guns. At the moment, to get a gun in the USA, you must either have a license or steal a gun which is a crime. If everyone had guns, anyone could get a hold of them and much easier than before, so crimes where guns are involved would multiply and there wouldn't be any police to deal with it, so we're sacrificing criminality to save money

Children can't vote, that's a fact. Does that mean we're infringing on their free speech? Absolutely not, it's just that some decisions are up to adults, because adults are usually more mature and responsible than children.
Yeah well a mistake like the one i mentioned is quite major and as i explained would be hard to recover from. It would take lots of money for there to even exist a chance to revert your genitals to what they were physically but also the transition from one gender to another would take great amounts of time and effort. Figuring out that the gender most suitable for you is the one you were given all along is not worth spending thousands on surgeries and sacrificing years of your life due to the confusion.

Yeah, but who's gonna make sure these guns are used for protection instead of for school shootings. Do you mean to say we must equip all teachers with guns in case a school shooting happens? This is pretty absurd. Also, when a bank is being robbed, people won't barge in there and stop the robbery, they have to contact someone. Who do they contact? The police or a sheriff's department which functions exactly like a police station.

Children are not allowed to make such decisions as children. Imagine if a child decided he wanted to change genders and did gender reassignment surgery. What if he changed his mind 10 years later? It would be a very difficult process to go back to the gender it used to be, both physically and mentally.

i mean we have to be protected one way or the other so i can't imagine a world without some form of police

Some humans contribute to it more than nothing. Celebrities wasting energy in order to fly their private jets are an example. Another example would obviously be entrepreneurs who work with carbon, those who own greenhouses for instance

Damn bro i was hoping for someone with less experience but sure ill try

If u get your voting permit before the deadline, could you also view and perhaps vote on my debate about school being mandatory. It's difficult to find people who evaluate debates, and i want to know who i did so that i can get better

Whatever you wish, in my opinion, we didn't get much out of each other. I mean i enjoyed it but i didn't like that we used things AGAINST the people we were representing, instead of things ABOUT them. Obviously, subjectivity played a huge role and there weren't things really to rebuttle, my opponent just ruled them off as irrelevant or unjustified and continued and to an extent so did I

i didnt have characters to rebuttle your other arguments but i'm happy to do so in a private session

the problem isn't really the children's age, it's the millions of pedos and criminals out there wanting to harm them as well as the incapacity of parents to warn and protect them

Now that solves the debate

It was asserting dominance, we all knew he wouldn't bomb shit. It was a show-off and nothing more and Biden can't assert dominance, he is being squeezed by all sides.

I don't live in America and i can't vote for either one but if i could choose i would be inbetween. I'm just doing this for entertainment purposes

if u change the voting period i will consider

I mean no one starts their own debates anymore so u gotta start your own and wait for people to accept.

guys vote before the voting period expires

if ur like mildly drunk, sure i don't see a problem

i think you could argue theres an inbetween but im only suggesting,i dont actually believe there is bcuz that would defy human nature etc.