You just explained the US system but didn't really address pro's arguments - by doing so you would be much more convincing. For example Jesper stated that US presidents can win the election with minority support and that studies show that the opinion of one person doesn't really matter in the US - you didn't refer to these pointsl
I critized that you didn't refer to pro's arguments, not that I don't understand your arguments
You just explained the US system but didn't really address pro's arguments - by doing so you would be much more convincing. For example Jesper stated that US presidents can win the election with minority support and that studies show that the opinion of one person doesn't really matter in the US - you didn't refer to these pointsl
Did RationalMadman even read and fully understand pro's arguments?