@Mps1213
Thanks for enquiring, this is the first debate for me and I didn't get an opposing point of view. You would make an interesting opponent for this argument as I understand your opinion makes you an outlier in your field.
The debate about, is the climate changing? has been done and dusted. Also that any natural conditions as a cause have been robustly eliminated. The scientific consensus is virtuously unanimous.
The thing about the aspect of this debate is to address the psychology of climate change denial. If someone has a logical alternative theory that has been published and peer reviewed and has a growing consensus it would help to demonstrate that denial of the prevailing consensus is not just avoidance of the uncomfortable truth.
So feeling like you don't find it wishful thinking actually supports the idea it is exactly wishful thinking.
@Mps1213
Thanks for enquiring, this is the first debate for me and I didn't get an opposing point of view. You would make an interesting opponent for this argument as I understand your opinion makes you an outlier in your field.
The debate about, is the climate changing? has been done and dusted. Also that any natural conditions as a cause have been robustly eliminated. The scientific consensus is virtuously unanimous.
The thing about the aspect of this debate is to address the psychology of climate change denial. If someone has a logical alternative theory that has been published and peer reviewed and has a growing consensus it would help to demonstrate that denial of the prevailing consensus is not just avoidance of the uncomfortable truth.
So feeling like you don't find it wishful thinking actually supports the idea it is exactly wishful thinking.