Total posts: 705
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
djectives come AFTER the noun, so it should be Hider Debiles
Technically true, but google translate is notorious for fucking up with grammatical rules in translation.
Source: took two years of Spanish in college
Created:
Posted in:
To be clear, I'm still on board with the lynch. Just think we should get some more participation from the peanut gallery
Created:
Posted in:
Actually
Unvote
This feels super fast. Let's let some other people post here. Drafter's made a single post, disc has been kinda quiet compared to last DP, and grey hasn't posted at all.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I don't know much about this show
I don't really put a whole lot of faith in theme analysis. Better ways to spend my time.
AND we still believe two MILLERs is highly unlikely
I was on the "two millers is legit" wagon.
Created:
Posted in:
Actually add Singularity to the town pile. Recent posts look genuine
Created:
Posted in:
My townpile:
DD
Luna
Supa
Water
I'm down to pressure/lynch anyone not listed here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Singularity
Fair enough. Hope things are going well for you
Unvote
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I have already throughout the DP, but I'll put them here anyway
In no order of preference:
1. Singularity for the quick hammer last DP
2. DD for his reaction/reads post Supa's post
3. GPs results, if he has any
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Singularity
I dont think we should discouraging hammering by making it scummy to hammer a town player.
That's not what I'm saying. The act of hammering isn't pro-town or pro-scum, it's just casting a vote. The manner in which you hammer, though, can suggest affiliation. Hence why things like "quickhammering" existing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
<br>Where did you post you thought DD was a good lead?
I hadn't. You never asked, though. The third lead is GPs results, if any, to pre-empt your next question.
I am not sure why you are so confused he was lynched
Not what I said. My suspicion is coming from the manner in which virt was hammered, not virt getting lynched generally.
Resisting claiming to prove how bad-ass you are is so 5 years ago
But how else am I gonna feel good about myself?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@oromagi
@Discipulus_Didicit
@Singularity
Yo let's get rolling already. There's shit going on to talk about.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Your leads from scum aren't necessarily shared by everyone
I mean, one of the leads is DD, so if that's not shared by you then I'm real confused.
To clarify, I want to see his reaction to Supa's post.
The wylted train seems a bit sus to me also.
That sounds like a statement that requires elaboration. I'm on Singularity because the quick hammer was scummy as shit and the activity from singularity preceding the hammer was not stellar, for the small amount of it that there was. If there's something there you disagree with, feel free to talk about it.
You gonna make me beg you for a claim?
I was just looking for a decent explanation as to why it was necessary, but now I definitely want to see you beg me. Thatd be funny as shit.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Zaradi needs to claim
There's legit zero reason for me to claim. We have three leads for scum and 0 of them rely on me claiming to move forward.
Moreover, I'm not the only one who hasn't claimed either. WP and drafter haven't claimed either. If I didn't know any better, I'd think that you liiiiiiiked me
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WaterPhoenix
Or you can not be lazy and just look at DP1...
Singularity has claimed character (El Limon) and hinted at their role (fucks people up) according to oro's drafterlist
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
do you not find it odd that DD's last post of DP1 was claiming he was wanting a lynch on bullish, and now he's toting he town read him the whole time?
Not to answer for WP, but 'is his change necessarily scum-motivated' should be the question asked. Quite a few of us were town-reading you but were down to lynch you yesterday. Just reads to me like hindsight glasses being 20/20
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I'm definitely down with singularity. That hammer was #sketchaf.
Vtl singularity
Gp, though, I'm not convinced. I wanna see him actually play a bit more before I commit to that one.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Bruh. If you don't know how to read me after how many years of playing on DDO together?, then me character claiming ain't fixing that issue lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
passionate in the last game we played.
1. I was scum in the last game we played.
2. I mentioned my waning interest in playing in Warren's signup thread. Read into it however you want.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
There are very few instances where I think VTNL is preferable to lynching someone. Yesterday was not one of them.
Also, slight town read to Luna with bullish being the NK. Its wifom, but I dont think scum luna would kill someone who was arguing against him
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
We might as well get the rest of the claims out
This sounds like an awful idea. We need to be deciding on our lynch for today, not doing a super late mass claim. I'll claim tomorrow if people really want it
Created:
Posted in:
As for a lynch target, I'm more comfortable lynching Virt over Lunatic if those are the two realistic options.
Vtl Virt
imma be around if people need me, but I'm at work so I won't be posting much.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WaterPhoenix
<br>I'll vote bullish, but only to hammer.
Why?
Created:
Posted in:
So I think at this point we can safely say that this Bullish vs. Luna debacle is certainly not a scum/scum shitfest. I'm about 55/45 on it being town/scum versus town/town
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I mean...
If I'm going to make a post to look for certain behavior or test for a reaction, I'm certainly not going to announce it when I make the post.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WaterPhoenix
Bruh. We're getting close to 500 posts in this thread. It's already a massive pain to review. Don't clog it up any more than that with fluff.what could possibly go wrong? :)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Solely by Bullish? Sure. Any by Bullish at all? I feel like 419 contradicts you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@Bullish
If i understand bullish's intent correctly, and he's free to correct me if I'm wrong, his intent wasn't specifically analyze behavior, but rather generate content that can be analyzed. Hence the "flashpoints of behavioral analysis" bit.
Created:
Posted in:
Definitely enough material to look through from supa that I'll unvote now. I'd also be down to hop on the virt inactivity wagon but that seems slightly hypocritical. Imma go back through all the luna shit to figure out if that's where I wanna vote because rn I'm not super sold on the idea.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
I'm taking a break from playing after the current game. Having a hard time motivating myself to do shit and I'd rather not just keep being inactive.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
B: Oh uh, no... no not just because of the miller claim. I meant to do that to generate behavior that we can think on further (223).L: You litterally just said "no need to think further" (225).
I don't actually see a problem here. Saying things to test people's reactions is pretty standard. If what Bullish says he intended to do was correct, well...there's 17 pages of stuff to analyze.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
Not a fan either, voting for yourself is varying levels of anti-town, but never pro town. The rest of his behavior seems fine, though.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
Who would the third be in that theory? We know there are three from the op
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Might've. I was skimming when I was looking for tags so I might've missed it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
VTL Supa
because pressure is always nice.
Also for the votes on Virt, why not just ping him to get him in here rather than VTLing? One gives him a notification to remind him and another does jack shit
Created:
Posted in:
I think we should be looking at pressuring Supa and Bullish. Supa for the reasons stated and bullish for effectively just dropping his vote on Luna because "miller CC" and has yet to post anything else at all. I'll add my vote to Supa since he seems more active, just gonna double check vote count first
Created:
Posted in:
Holy shit I picked a bad day to focus on running errands. Catching up
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
I need to take a walk to the nearest bar
Drink of choice?
Also, what do you do for fun? You sound like someone who needs a hobby
Created:
Posted in:
Oh, also so it's on the record, I'm also really not a fan of mass claiming for this game.
Created:
Posted in:
Quick thoughts before I go crash again:
I buy the possibility that multiple millers could exist in a theme like this. I have around zero knowledge of the show, but quick Google summaries seem to make me think that most of the characters in the show are involved in some degree of shady shit. It's as much of a CC as when two people claim vanilla.
That being said, the safest place to lynch currently is between them. Miller's are pretty anti-town by nature, so short of a massive slip on scum's part, I'd be okay with writing down either of their names.
I'm against lynching now before we can get some more people involved in this DP, though
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Yes he is the main "villain" or antagonist in the show, though most of the show is also from his perspective and the show tries to make the audience see things from his perspective.
I believe the term you're looking for is 'antihero'.
Also catching up with this game now. I've been sleeping like shit (3-4 hours a night) for a while and today was my first day off of work in a while so I spent most of it passed out.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Still not close to Shakugan no Shana. No game will ever be as much of a bloodbath as that game was.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
You were confirmed town and I needed to be nk'ing people who I had no chance of lynching
Created: