"either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions.either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions."
If you are going to say that some living things don't have those categories, then you're saying that since in some cases some animals are born without gender, that means that it is a normal thing in other animals too
Thats like saying if a human is born with only one arm, then it is a normal biological thing in humans to have one arm, but no it isn't, it's a mutation.
Is this guy going to make another argument?
https://www.google.com/search?q=definition+of+sex&oq=definition+of+sex&aqs=edge..69i57j0i512l7j69i64.2594j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
"either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions.either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions."
Your view on this is psychotic and crazy.
But there isn't any alternate means of reproduction in humans.
But there isn't any alternate means of reproduction in humans.
If you are going to say that some living things don't have those categories, then you're saying that since in some cases some animals are born without gender, that means that it is a normal thing in other animals too
Thats like saying if a human is born with only one arm, then it is a normal biological thing in humans to have one arm, but no it isn't, it's a mutation.