I dont want to compromise votes. I only want to say that you please do not quit this debate. It is a fascinating read thus far. I want to see it to the end.
Thank you for the vote. Most importantly, thank you for highlighting your bias. That is a very difficult thing for people. Your vote is about the quality of the debate and not the subject. Thank you for that. Feel free to invite me to discuss the issue at a later time... I have already shown my cards :). We appear to disagree on a few things, and I like that. Good frank open conversations. Be well and thank you.
Thank you for the vote. Would you mind giving me your thoughts, even very thinly of my arguments? This was not about winning. This was about articulating a different perspective, and seeing how well it holds up to intelligent scrutiny. I understand if you are jammed for time. Thanks
I would differ in your opinion as the disclaimer talks about learning. Not once have I seen any form of agreeableness or capitulation which I think k is very important in life and as an effective debater.
The instigator has 5 of these debates in play right now. Everything you say will be retorted with "if you read it in context, it makes sense". Mall is just trying to publically intellectually masturbate a bit.
I don't want to get defensive, I disagree with your judgment, however you brought up some very interesting points. Once votes are done I will explain what be my disagreements . Thank you for a thoughtful and well structured vote. Your time is very appreciated.
Thank you for that comment. I think it is important for debaters who have been ghosted, get an opportunity to opine on the arguments. How do we learn otherwise? I dont want everyone to agree. I want them to disagree with thought, and substance. Judges can play a great role in that, I think. That is how we become enlightened.
Fair point. I note that Con did meet the BOP. Specifically -->. "^^^ As you can see, Holocaust denial is not simply a "difference in opinion." There wouldn't be a call to police language over offensive views if it weren't responsible for causing harm which Pro seems to be ignoring." I look forward to the next one. Keep it civil :)
While I disagree with some of your conclusions Whiteflame, I really appreciate you taking the time to read the debate and make very well-drafted notes and comments. Thank you very much. I am happy to debate with you on any of the sub-issues that I brought up that you disagreed with. Thank you again for your fantastic contribution to the conversation.
"People who dont forgive end up being angry atheists"
It is possible to find meaning, purpose, and happiness in life regardless of one's stance on forgiveness or religion. If you disagree, feel free to open a debate about it for me.
If you take 1 and divide it by 3, you get 1/3 = 0.333333333.... Add three of those together and you get 0.999999999..... If that does not = 1, then where did that missing piece go?
I am new hear, and I do not want to be cras. That being said Invictus (per the signature on their profile) has made proposturious allegations against me, despite me showing, that the company that they accuse me of using, states my content iis not AI created. If the respondant agrees, we can use the last segments to prove authenticity of the narrivte, when in reality it should be about the content. Are we not here to learn? Be as it may, I was accused, and I resent it,and will see it out.
I have no idea what you are talking about with respect to this being AI or ChatGPT written. If you actually paste the content into chatgpt's detector, created by OpenAI it says,. "The classifier considers the text to be unlikely AI-generated." If you paste the content in parts or the whole thing into crossplag.com's ai detector it says it has less than 1% contribution by AI. If you go to writer.com and check using its AI tool, it says the conclusion is 100% written by humans. Your accusations are complete without merit. As I told you in the text, I know how to find relevant sources for conceptual ideas.
I am going to polish off an essay I wrote on this subject about 3 years ago. It is going to take me a while. I am not going to go into the work if this is a trolling word game = based on "all". You opened the debate by saying this was about exploring the subjects and trying to take something away. Are you actually going to read what I write and engage with the content? I am reading your comments here and your first post as being a bit combative. I am not an atheist by the way.
I messed up my vote. Can you delete it please. Sorry.
Other sides we will be.. a complete and detailed professional you are. a great break down. Top shelf in analysis.
Are you going to post?
I dont want to compromise votes. I only want to say that you please do not quit this debate. It is a fascinating read thus far. I want to see it to the end.
Best.Korea, Thank you for the vote. It was a long one, and I appreciate you putting in the time.
Barney, I hope you can get through the rest of it for a vote
Cheers
Redo this debate, and I will take it on. Change the time to the argument to 3 days please.
Well if the vote comes down to that one thing, neither of us did a good enough job :)
No worries.
Anyone interested in voting?
Fair point. The limited source difference was not consequential to the overall score. I misspoke. Accept my apologies, please.
Change the resolution to "Islam is superior to any other philosophy for operating one's life"
4 rounds.
Set your aguments
Rebuttal
Correction to Rebuttal
Conclude
I will absolutley give tolerance to english as your second language.
I will have a crack at it.
Is this a "four corners" of a religion argument, or is this a wider concept. Are you saying:
"All things being equal, Islam is superior to any other philosophy for operating ones life"
If so, then I would accept, arguing from a principal of being agnostic.
I have to be very creative to have any chance in this one.
Ok, I reserve the right to throw in a joke or two. :)
What a great topic. This could be really fun. Can we change the grammar point to comedy? Whoever has the funniest points?
Any objections to me repurposing the narrative from another debate I have had on the subject?
As a pacifist this is going to be hard. Bring it on!!!
3 days for arguments, can we increase the character count? I would appreciate it. Not needed.
Thank you for the vote. Most importantly, thank you for highlighting your bias. That is a very difficult thing for people. Your vote is about the quality of the debate and not the subject. Thank you for that. Feel free to invite me to discuss the issue at a later time... I have already shown my cards :). We appear to disagree on a few things, and I like that. Good frank open conversations. Be well and thank you.
Thank you for the vote. Would you mind giving me your thoughts, even very thinly of my arguments? This was not about winning. This was about articulating a different perspective, and seeing how well it holds up to intelligent scrutiny. I understand if you are jammed for time. Thanks
Is it OK to opine on a debate or a vote, with specifics when it is in action?
I would differ in your opinion as the disclaimer talks about learning. Not once have I seen any form of agreeableness or capitulation which I think k is very important in life and as an effective debater.
I sorted by Voting and jumped to page 4. all done with 2 clicks.
The instigator has 5 of these debates in play right now. Everything you say will be retorted with "if you read it in context, it makes sense". Mall is just trying to publically intellectually masturbate a bit.
I don't want to get defensive, I disagree with your judgment, however you brought up some very interesting points. Once votes are done I will explain what be my disagreements . Thank you for a thoughtful and well structured vote. Your time is very appreciated.
Thank you for that comment. I think it is important for debaters who have been ghosted, get an opportunity to opine on the arguments. How do we learn otherwise? I dont want everyone to agree. I want them to disagree with thought, and substance. Judges can play a great role in that, I think. That is how we become enlightened.
A nice copy and paste from https://www.learnreligions.com/reasons-to-convert-to-buddhism-449752
Not even an independent thought.
I name dropped you in my argument :)
I agree with you... I am just wondering how to argue the other side.. Gonna noodle this one.
Fair point. Feel free to construct one whiteflame. Austin, same for you bud.
Fair point. I note that Con did meet the BOP. Specifically -->. "^^^ As you can see, Holocaust denial is not simply a "difference in opinion." There wouldn't be a call to police language over offensive views if it weren't responsible for causing harm which Pro seems to be ignoring." I look forward to the next one. Keep it civil :)
While I disagree with some of your conclusions Whiteflame, I really appreciate you taking the time to read the debate and make very well-drafted notes and comments. Thank you very much. I am happy to debate with you on any of the sub-issues that I brought up that you disagreed with. Thank you again for your fantastic contribution to the conversation.
Quality K in the opening round.
"People who dont forgive end up being angry atheists"
It is possible to find meaning, purpose, and happiness in life regardless of one's stance on forgiveness or religion. If you disagree, feel free to open a debate about it for me.
If you take 1 and divide it by 3, you get 1/3 = 0.333333333.... Add three of those together and you get 0.999999999..... If that does not = 1, then where did that missing piece go?
Fair point. And I will ensure to be fair and clear.
I liked your submission.
I think there should be a conduct penalty for the longest bad joke I have ever read.
Quack Quack.
I am new hear, and I do not want to be cras. That being said Invictus (per the signature on their profile) has made proposturious allegations against me, despite me showing, that the company that they accuse me of using, states my content iis not AI created. If the respondant agrees, we can use the last segments to prove authenticity of the narrivte, when in reality it should be about the content. Are we not here to learn? Be as it may, I was accused, and I resent it,and will see it out.
I have no idea what you are talking about with respect to this being AI or ChatGPT written. If you actually paste the content into chatgpt's detector, created by OpenAI it says,. "The classifier considers the text to be unlikely AI-generated." If you paste the content in parts or the whole thing into crossplag.com's ai detector it says it has less than 1% contribution by AI. If you go to writer.com and check using its AI tool, it says the conclusion is 100% written by humans. Your accusations are complete without merit. As I told you in the text, I know how to find relevant sources for conceptual ideas.
That is an awesome start. I have my work cut out for me.
Being a noob here, I do not understand a tie vote, when I am the one who actually gave an argument. Thanks for helping me understand.
I am going to polish off an essay I wrote on this subject about 3 years ago. It is going to take me a while. I am not going to go into the work if this is a trolling word game = based on "all". You opened the debate by saying this was about exploring the subjects and trying to take something away. Are you actually going to read what I write and engage with the content? I am reading your comments here and your first post as being a bit combative. I am not an atheist by the way.