Skipper_Sr

Penguins are harder to understand.

You are doing well representing them. You have earned the title.

You sound like me.

For the sake of argument you are though. I think you'd benefit from looking up the answer for "What is a claim in debate terminology?"

Again, I am not claiming that my claim is true. I come into a debate by arguing that my position is not true.

But, this is contradictory to the function of a debate. Two people are representatives for their chosen side on the topic. You can't represent the side that"nothing is true" because fighting for that is contradictory to what it means.

Again, you have it backwards. I am not representing my side as true. I am representing my side as not true.

Every time you try to defend that nothing is true, you are contradicting the fundamentals of argumentation which is the highest and intelligent form of conversation.

I am not defending that "nothing is true". That is just your assumption. By claiming that nothing is true, I have nothing to defend since I didnt claim that anything is true.

Jesus did recommend poking one's own eyes out. 

You are making a claim.

But I am not saying that the claim is true.

It could be possible that you don't believe what you are saying. But you present yourself like you do believe it.

No. The claim "truth doesnt exist" maintains that nothing is true. Thus, none of my claims need to be proved because I never said they are true.

In the words of a famous writer:

"If someone proved to me that Jesus isnt the truth, then I should prefer to remain with Jesus rather than with the truth."

I dont even know why you argued so far. Arguing against Christians is pointless

He who holds the most power is always the most dangerous

One country, one leader.

It is the law of nature discovered by Hitler in his books.

Is that statement true or not? You are bringing up an exception to the rule, so you need to prove this exception, at least to show that it is more likely than the already established truth logic.

You have it backwards. It is you who needs to prove your rule. I dont need to prove anything since I never claimed that anything is true. In fact, I maintain that true statement doesnt exist.

One of us is correct, right?

No. Truth doesnt exist, so it is impossible to be correct.

you believe what you are saying is correct

Stop putting words in my mouth. I never said that what I am saying is correct. Not sure why you are attacking a strawman like that.

General Mark Milley, who chaired the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Trump presidency, has voiced his emphatic verdict to author Bob Woodward: “No one has ever been as dangerous to this country as Donald Trump … Now I realize he’s a total fascist. He is the most dangerous person to this country.” Many others who served with the former president offer similar views.

Trump’s derogatory comments are often targeted at nonwhite immigrants; in 2018, he referred to Haiti and African nations as “shithole countries.” His latest claims about Haitian immigrants in Ohio have no basis in fact and were pushed, in part, by a neo-Nazi group.

“They don’t care about crime and want illegal immigrants, no matter how bad they may be, to pour into and infest our Country, like MS-13.” [6/19/18]

“The Democrats say, ‘Please don’t call them animals. They’re humans.’ I said, ‘No, they’re not humans, they’re not humans. They’re animals.’” [4/2/24]

“They’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there, and this is what’s happening in our country, and it’s a shame.” [9/10/24]

Bertrand Russell was a British philosopher, logician, mathematician, and public intellectual. He had influence on mathematics, logic, set theory, and various areas of analytic  philosophy. From about the age of fifteen he became deeply concerned with questions like the existence of god, for which he could find no evidence. At the age of eighteen he became an atheist. He found it a great relief to be free of some of the fears and dogma surrounding religion.

Come on man, you know that all statements are either true or not true. To claim not not truth is to claim truth

Truth doesnt exist, thus the fantasy division between truth and not truth doesnt exist either.

I would say that my logic demonstrates the reality that truth is self-evident.

No, that was your claim which is circular logic. Do you think circular logic is true?

But then I would like to understand what is "proof" to you. 

Is the world and universe in all of its design evidence?

No. The existence of the world and universe is only evidence if we assume that we should trust our eyes. However, I already explained that we shouldnt trust our eyes. God is by definition greater than our eyes, so why should one believe in what he sees with his own eyes? It is much better to believe in one of the thousands of interpretations of one of the few hundred versions of Bible.

Am I correct in saying that you believe proof has to precede truth?

You claim that truth exists. So prove that truth exists. Otherwise, its just faith.

Is that a true statement? It's self-defeating to believe in truth that says "there is no truth."

Nothing is true, not even this statement. I already said that I dont believe in truth. I believe in Jesus. No "self defeat" happens, because the statement doesnt claim that its true. It claims that both it and all other statements are not true. This disproves science and truth.

Why is this a problem?

Your logic proves that Jesus-God exists.

It is unproven--because it's self-evident

So you concede that your truth is unproven. This sounds like victory for the Bible.

Trump‘s often vulgar denunciation of his opponents’ alleged failures consistently highlights the claim that he alone can fix the problems in public policy and society. That claim finds an analogy in Hitler’s persistent demand that he be the sole leader in Germany.

So it cant be proven. Its just faith.

Besides, your logic can be applied to Jesus-God too. Jesus-God is Jesus-God whether you believe in it or not.

It also doesnt include any proof that truth even exists.

The truth would already be true whether it is known to you or not

That sounds like an unproved claim.

No it's not circular reasoning.

You said that truth is self-evident (that it proves itself). That is circular reasoning where A is a proof for A.

After meeting Hitler, Elon Musk said "This is what victory is", then he did a nazi salute two times.

Here is a video from a different angle which shows Musk doing nazi salute two times after he met Hitler:

https://youtu.be/e2bbb-6Clhs?si=zSDkEhGQ2OPOHX3w

He was excited, so he did the salute two times instead of one.

The fact that you think you are a penguin opens room for bullies.

What is a healthy expression of anger?

Expressing your angry feelings in an assertive—not aggressive—manner is the healthiest way to express anger. To do this, you have to learn how to make clear what your needs are, and how to get them met, without hurting others.

Though looking back at my early years, I see that friends were nonetheless always competitive.

Always trying to gain one-upmanship

Alberto substitutes as your super ego.

Not sure how many people on this website play Fortnite but I would be interested to hear what yall think.

Funny you say that… because you can’t even play Fortnite on iOS rn😂

It was such a banger of a season to start on, and no season I’ve played since has topped it.

The current bible has no reference to reincarnation because it was removed but there are some hints that lead us to think that reincarnation was a Christian doctrine at the beginning. "Now the Pharisees who had been sent questioned him, “Why then do you baptize if you are not the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?” John 1, 24-25. In that verse, Elijah had already long died but the Pharisees asked if John the Baptist was him. It's not a direct reference to reincarnation but I think we all understand what the pharisees tried to say.